Stem Cells & Healing?

[Kumar]

Moreover medicine is defined as under:-

"•Medicine is the art and science of healing. It encompasses a range of health care practices evolved to maintain and restore health by the prevention and treatment of illness.
"

It does not suggest side/toxic effects.

 

[Taffer]

Because it looks not working to you, because it does not show apperant side effects whereas toxic quantities can easily show.

Medicines have side effects. That is reality, Kumar. If the side effects are not worse than the benefits, then we will use it. Homeopathy has no benefits, as well as no side effects, because it has no effect.

 

[Taffer]

Real medicines should be with least or no adversities. Half cooked medicines can't be said as rela medicines.

Nonsense.

True, valid & practical purpose of any healing agent is to get cure but not to make theories. If science want to know as it duty or for curiosity or for vested interests(hijecking), burden of proof lie on science. Homeopath even if having evidances will tend to avoid it for commercial interests. You may not like to show your house to others who can rob.

Rubbish. Homeopathy has no evidence that it works. In fact, homeopathy has scientific evidence that it doesn't work.

 

[PixyMisa]

Real medicines should be with least or no adversities.

No. Wrong.

Real medicine needs to have an advantage that outweighs the disadvantages.

If my heart medicine helps prevent future heart attacks and significantly extends my life but causes difficulty sleeping, then I take the medicine.

Homeopathy doesn't have side effects, because homeopathy doesn't have any effects at all.

However, if I were taking homeopathy rather than beta blockers, I would be far more likely to drop dead tomorrow.*

True, valid & practical purpose of any healing agent is to get cure but not to make theories.

No. That's not good enough. You have to actually know if the medicine is effective.

We KNOW that homeopathy is NOT effective. It has NO EFFECT WHATSOEVER. It is USELESS.

If science want to know as it duty or for curiosity or for vested interests(hijecking), burden of proof lie on science.

Done that. Homepathy has been proven not to work.

Homeopath even if having evidances will tend to avoid it for commercial interests.

Homepaths have no evidence. They do, however, have an endless supply of suckers.

You may not like to show your house to others who can rob.

So don't do that then.

Controlling & goverment authorities also gave licence to homeopathy.

As I said, idiots.

* Don't worry folks, this is only an example. If I drop dead tomorrow, it will probably be an aneurysm caused by sheer exasperation.

 

[Kumar]

Medicines have side effects. That is reality, Kumar. If the side effects are not worse than the benefits, then we will use it. Homeopathy has no benefits, as well as no side effects, because it has no effect.

How can you say when you are not absolute & final. Popularity, natural validity, Conviniencies & addictions can make even a odd thing as even. I simply try keep least adverse effects therefore prefer C+P but you only C and only P.

 

[Kumar]

Nonsense.



Rubbish. Homeopathy has no evidence that it works. In fact, homeopathy has scientific evidence that it doesn't work.

Then why regulatory authorities & government do not ban it? Their allowing & encouraging, is itself a proof.

 

[Kumar]

No. Wrong.

Real medicine needs to have an advantage that outweighs the disadvantages.

Mind you, you are using real[/quote] medicine not just chemicals. Definition of medicine which I gave you do not mention side/adverse/toxic effects. What is the definition of real medicine as per you?

If my heart medicine helps prevent future heart attacks and significantly extends my life but causes difficulty sleeping, then I take the medicine.

I think less sleep is also related to heart problems, PNS & stem cells inactivations. Antibiotics to its resistance which is thought to be a main reason to balance the created imbalances.

Homeopathy doesn't have side effects, because homeopathy doesn't have any effects at all.

However, if I were taking homeopathy rather than beta blockers, I would be far more likely to drop dead tomorrow.*


No. That's not good enough. You have to actually know if the medicine is effective.

We KNOW that homeopathy is NOT effective. It has NO EFFECT WHATSOEVER. It is USELESS.


Done that. Homepathy has been proven not to work.


Homepaths have no evidence. They do, however, have an endless supply of suckers.


So don't do that then.


As I said, idiots.

* Don't worry folks, this is only an example. If I drop dead tomorrow, it will probably be an aneurysm caused by sheer exasperation.

You can't say anything for sure unless you are absolute & final. But I can assure that commercialization is much lesser in it than CMs. People are calculating & assuming me to be dead soon but by god graced my preferances, touch wood, I am still continuing better than other similar ones inspite still enjoying eatings.

 

[PixyMisa]

How can you say when you are not absolute & final.

Because we've tested it. Homepathy is completely useless. It does nothing. Despite all the claims, no homeopath has ever presented any evidence that homeopathy is effective, nor any explanation of how it could be effective in contradiction of all the laws of physics.

Popularity, natural validity

Is just an excuse. Homeopathy does not work.

Conviniencies & addictions can make even a odd thing as even.

Is absolute nonsense.

I simply try keep least adverse effects therefore prefer C+P but you only C and only P.

Homeopathy has no side effects, but it has no effects. That means that if you are actually sick, the adverse effects of homeopathy can kill you. Tha adverse effect there being that it does nothing to cure your illness.

 

[PixyMisa]

Then why regulatory authorities & government do not ban it?

Because they are idiots.

Their allowing & encouraging, is itself a proof.

It's proof that they are idiots, yes.

 

[PixyMisa]

Mind you, you are using real medicine not just chemicals.

What is that supposed to mean?

Definition of medicine which I gave you do not mention side/adverse/toxic effects.

So?

What is the definition of real medicine as per you?

Substances and procedures with a scientifically demonstrable effect against illness and injury.

I think less sleep is also related to heart problems

Beta blockers are provably effective at reducing mortality in heart patients. They can also cause insomnia; it's a known side-effect. It's a minor one compared to dying, which is why heart patients are often prescribed beta blockers.

PNS & stem cells inactivations.

NO.

Antibiotics to its resistance which is thought to be a main reason to balance the created imbalances.

NO. No-one thinks that.

You can't say anything for sure unless you are absolute & final.

Yes I can.

Nothing is "absolute & final" outside of mathematics. You're just using that as an excuse to believe in something that is demonstrably untrue, useless, and harmful.

However, since nothing is "absolute & final" outside of mathematics, the definition of "sure" changes with respect to the real world.

Are we sure that homeopathy doesn't work? Yes. We know this. We know it the way we know that the world is not flat. We know this the way we know that babies are not delivered by storks. We know this the way we know that Godzilla does not destroy Tokyo every few years.

Homeopathy is a lie, a fraud inflicted by charlatans upon a gullible and uneducated public. You've fallen for it, and you refuse to learn.

But I can assure that commercialization is much lesser in it than CMs.

Who cares? Homeopathy doesn't work.

People are calculating & assuming me to be dead soon but by god graced my preferances, touch wood, I am still continuing better than other similar ones inspite still enjoying eatings.

Who cares? Homeopathy doesn't work.

 

[Taffer]

PixyMisa has answered as well as I can, Kumar, so please refer to his post for an answer to yours.

 

[Kumar]

What is that supposed to mean?

You are using "real" word which should be A & F, but probably it may just justify "experimental" instead.

So?

Substances and procedures with a scientifically demonstrable effect against illness and injury.

Is it demonstrable effect against illness and injury or demonstrable cure against illness and injury?

Beta blockers are provably effective at reducing mortality in heart patients. They can also cause insomnia; it's a known side-effect. It's a minor one compared to dying, which is why heart patients are often prescribed beta blockers.

Because HBP is a life long disorder, I may want to see life long DBPC studies.

NO.

NO. No-one thinks that.

Yes I can.

Nothing is "absolute & final" outside of mathematics. You're just using that as an excuse to believe in something that is demonstrably untrue, useless, and harmful.

However, since nothing is "absolute & final" outside of mathematics, the definition of "sure" changes with respect to the real world.

Are we sure that homeopathy doesn't work? Yes. We know this. We know it the way we know that the world is not flat. We know this the way we know that babies are not delivered by storks. We know this the way we know that Godzilla does not destroy Tokyo every few years.

Homeopathy is a lie, a fraud inflicted by charlatans upon a gullible and uneducated public. You've fallen for it, and you refuse to learn.

Who cares? Homeopathy doesn't work.

Who cares? Homeopathy doesn't work.

People at mass are convinced with you about earth shape but nt yet with homeopathy.

 

[Mojo]

Moreover medicine is defined as under:-

"•Medicine is the art and science of healing. It encompasses a range of health care practices evolved to maintain and restore health by the prevention and treatment of illness.
"

It does not suggest side/toxic effects.

Why do you say that?

 

[Kumar]

Because they are idiots.

It's proof that they are idiots, yes.

Then file claims. court should not be.

Other may feel similar about your things due to their potential adversities with not A & F.

 

[Taffer]

People at mass are convinced with you about earth shape but nt yet with homeopathy.

What people are convinced of is irrelevant. Only what can be experimentally proven. Also, homeopathy does not work.

 

[Kumar]

Why do you say that?

Because you use "real medicine" word. Till these are A & F with out adversities probably these neither justify real nor medicine but otherwise can.

 

[Taffer]

Then file claims. court should not be.

Other may feel similar about your things due to their potential adversities with not A & F.

What governments do is irrelevant to whether something is true.

 

[Taffer]

Because you use "real medicine" word. Till these are A & F with out adversities probably these neither justify real nor medicine but otherwise can.

Stop talking nonsense. You do not get to redefine words to make them fit your wild ideas. "Real Medicine" means it actually helps the patient. Homeopathy doesn't do this because it does nothing! Homeopathy is just water and sugar!

 

[Kumar]

What people are convinced of is irrelevant. Only what can be experimentally proven. Also, homeopathy does not work.

Whatever you feel/find is your property & choice.

Better, henceforth use "experimental medicine" instead of "real medicine"

 

[Kumar]

Stop talking nonsense. You do not get to redefine words to make them fit your wild ideas. "Real Medicine" means it actually helps the patient. Homeopathy doesn't do this because it does nothing! Homeopathy is just water and sugar!

Same you are trying. How can you say for A & F that homeopathic remedies are just water and sugar? uptill you are A & F?