Zed, when you produce reliable measurements, you let us know.
For the meatball fanatics like Sweaty who want rub their hands together and cackle about my nefarious collusion with Philip Morris to boonswoggle the Bigfoot nation into believing him I say, go fly a UFO. You're a koo koo for cocoa puffs Bigfoot fanatic suckling on the teat of woo, living in a Bizarro World and I couldn't care less what backflips you need to do to maintain your clinghold on your goofball fantasies.
Sweaty, you still have not shown that you are looking at the true length of Bob or Patty's upper arm. Are they both parallel to the camera lens? Please show your work.
I have plenty of images of Bob, viewed from different angles. I can put a few together, that should show whether or not Bob's arm...in the image above...is being held out away from his side, and thereby fore-shortened.
I don't think that it is...but that should be able to be determined, fairly easily.
Edited to addited:
The image of Patty above shows that her upper arm cannot be Heirony's, for another reason. This one is due to the simple fact that Patty's extreme shoulder-width (approx. 27") would require Bob's shoulder-joints to be located 2-3 inches inboard of Patty's shoulders...(per side.)
This amount of 'padding-out' of the shoulders would produce an unnatural bend in the upper-half of Patty's upper-arm....(in this view of Patty, where her arm is swung so far forward)...at the point where Bob's humerus moves out of the suit arm, and into the upper-body suit.
There isn't an unnatural bend......so it can't be Bob's upper arm.
When you DO something...other than rant....let us know.
Bobby-Boo is still having a tough time matching-up with Patty........(even over-scaled, his upper arm is still too short for the elbow-joints to line-up)...
I won't spam this thread with the same images over and over as you do, but I will ask you, do I have an image of Bob in a suit and Patty in which the eyes, elbows, and knees line up?
But he will have time.
There is no 'surprise factor' involved here...in Morris being confronted with questions allegedly intended to expose him...(though those questions are coming from skeptics on the 'same side of the fence' as Morris)......and the amount of time Morris will have to prepare his answers is being told to us by kitakaze, who is sitting on the same side of the fence as the person being....."confronted"...."grilled"..."Investigated"....what a joke.
Also, as you know have read, Phil and I have agreed that he will not see the questions I will ask him on camera until I meet him face to face. Phil's at his son's graduation now. He really does have better things to do than try and figure how to please fanatic losers. People from all corners of Bigfoot nation are submitting good questions to me for when I sit down with Phil tomorrow.
Again I ask you, are questions from an informed person who thinks Morris is a liar and seeks to expose him as such with those questions that of someone on his side of the fence?
That 'standing height' would have to have been about 2-3 inches taller than Bob's standing height...due to the cone-shaped headpiece.
Pre- or post-piano?
[snip][/snip]
I'll respond to those questions.....as soon as I can, River.![]()
Well Sweaty, I'm willing to consider your "elbow reach" theory if you will take the neccesary steps in considering alternatives for the discrepancies that you offer between PGF subject and Heironimus. I've noticed in the images youve presented in the past (some with measurements) that you have not considered how those numbers may be influenced by a padded undersuit. This image represents an actor using shoulder and arm pads that are used to disguise and make the actor appear much more bulky and muscular than he is underneath.
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k273/iammenotu/gemora.jpg
I'm not suggesting this was the exact padding used, but this type of under padding is common with ape/gorilla suits.
Do you think a well made suit with properly placed padding could distort or rather... disguise where the proper joint placement would be? (after all, that is what its designed to do right?)
He asked only that when I come and meet him at the hotel and we sit down to dinner, I have the questions then that I can show him on paper or whatever so he's not totally blind when the camera goes on. That works perfectly for me as there is simply no way Phil can research the questions or get any support. It is going to be only him, his wife if she joins us then, myself and my cameraman. After dinner we walk over to the Royal BC Museum, do an intro shot for Phil, myself, the PGF, the museum, etc, then head back to the hotel for the main interview. Bingo bango, it's in the bag.
and to decide which parts of the interview will quickly be released...

What kind of questions did Bill Munns have?
Bill Munns @ BFF said:1. How did you become aware of the Patterson-Gimlin Film? Was it from a TV program, a magazine writeup, or other?
2. Do you recall when this was?
3. When did you first think that the PGF was showing a suit your company had made? What were you looking at to see enough similarity to your suits to know that was one of yours?
4. When did you first bring this to the attention of other people? Is there any documentation you may have to verify this answer?
5. At what point did you make the general public aware that the film has one of your suits? How was this announced? Press release, advertising, some kind of article or interview about you or your company?
6. What prompted you to make this disclosure public?
7. How did Roger Patterson contact you to purchase the suit? Letters, phone calls, meetings?
8. Is there any particular reason you remembered this customer?
9. Did he purchase or rent a suit?
10. What exactly did this customer purchase or rent?
11. What are your financial terms of sale or rental?
12. By any chance are there any customer receipts, billing invoices, other documentation of transaction kept?
13. It is reported by Bob Heironimous that the suit he wore was a two piece configuration, a pants section and a tee-shirt like section, apart from mask, gloves, etc. Do you sell a suit constructed this way?
14. If not, can you think of any reason why it was modified to have more closure seam areas than the suit you provided?
15. Is the fur material stretch fur?
16. If not, what is the tallest a man could be and wear the suit, so head to toe, he fits in it?
17. If a person is shorter than the maximum height to wear your suit, what do you recommend for the legs of the suit bunching up at the ankle, where the excess length sags to?
18. Is the foot designed for a person to wear it barefoot or with shoes? If with shoes, do the costume toes extend beyond the shoe, or are the costume toes fused together so the shoe can go closer to the tip of the toes?
19. What size shoe is the largest you think can fit in your costume feet?
20. The feet, hand gloves, and face mask are made of what material?
21. If the costume feet are separated from the fur pant legs of the suit, how high up the ankle do the costume feet go?
22. Does the suit fur around the ankle taper into the ankle size, or are the legs just straight down like regular pant legs?
23. Is there a chest piece on the suit?
24. If so, when you make your suit, does the chest piece simply attach over the fur chest section, or do you sew or glue the fur only to the edges of the chest piece?
25. What would you estimate is the waist diameter or size of your costume? How large a man, in terms of pant waist size, would fit into your suit?
Bill Munns said:15. Is the fur material stretch fur?
kitakaze said:It was not. It was a knitted cloth material to which was attached brown dynel.
how 'bout dropping a quick bombshell??!!
Patty is black.