Canadian712
Scholar
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 56
This shows how quickly a language can erode and die, 60 years is very quick to loose a language. And we see the same thing starting to happen to Montréal.
There's a problem: it's not happening. People in Montreal are speaking more French than English and if immigrants want to choose English over French, they have the right to. No one has the right to tell them which language to choose. If no one believes me about not having freedom of choice in terms of language in Quebec, here it is from the horse's mouth:"It is not acceptable to send this message, that it is possible to have free choice."...from non other than the fascist separatist bigot Pauline Marois, leader of the PQ.
That's the only thing we want to prevent with those laws, to prevent French from disappearing from Québec, and North America (ironically, in our case French is the one we want to protect, while in Brussels French is the threat).
And that's fine. But you don't have to suppress other languages to do that. It's my fundemental rights to freedom of speech to post signs in whatever language i desire. I understand that French must be present, but if you look at other provinces, English does not have to be present. What you don't seem to understand is that you can't legislate a culture/language. If you enforce it upon someone, you'll actually have the opposite effect, which is one of the reason Quebec has the lowest amount of immigrants than the ROC.
Btw Pardalis, I was referring to Dutch itself as a language, not Dutch in Brussels. Currently, Dutch is only spoken in a part of Germany and Greenland. Your response to my point is invalid, because most Danes are fluent English speakers, more than Quebecers as a matter of fact. You seem to forget that Quebec was doing much better before Renee Levesque and his little gang took power in the late 70s.
