• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
A rumor? Seriously, this is what you think is evidence? 100,000 Jews from your nation are never heard from again, and you think a reported rumor is the answer.

Yet, they never attempted to return home, no messages to family and friends?

You obviously did not followup on my advice to 'read on'. You even quoted 'read on' yourself.

To paraphrase the name of a famous holoskeptic website:

onefifthofthedutchholocaust.nl


And do you oversee all the 100,000s of messages that have been send? Of course not. I repeat what I have said before. I have no idea where 99% of the classmates and neighbours of my youth are. According to your logic they must have been gassed. But I agree, the Jews in 1945 should have been using facebook and linkedln to find each other back again.

Oh wait, earlier in the thread I posted a link saying that of all the people who were acquainted with Anne Frank only 7% were proven to have been died somewhere in the East, a number consistent with revisionist estimates of 200-500K.
 
Last edited:
Look and though will find...

http://moranen.blogspot.com/

Gigantic Finnish revisionist resource with about all the pictures of Auschwitz you will ever need. Among them a scan of this document:

http://bp0.blogger.com/_AB36D4g8j4Q/R6oAjweVsuI/AAAAAAAAABs/URR10hqkoEI/s1600-h/US_Telegram_02a.jpg

Telegram from an American militaryman describing what really happened during the initial phase of Bolshevism. Read from first hand who populated the initial revolutionary councils. The Germans understood the situation and acted. Unfortunately for all the white people on this planet, there was still this miserable island for the coast of mainland Europe, whose population had lost control of their own government...

Funds had been arranged two days earlier at a private dinner in North London, hosted by the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Its vice-president Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, chairman of British Shell, was a charismatic Zionist extrovert who would become, in the words of his authorised biographer Robert Henriques, the "veritable dynamic force of Focus."
At a dinner on July 22 [1936] at his home, Caen Wood Towers, he launched the initial secret £50,000 fund for the Focus. His associates signed immediate cheques for £25,000 and pledged the rest.
It was a colossal sum for such an organisation to butter around in 1936 - five times the annual budget of the British Council.
Link.

Churchill bought and paid for by the Jews. With devastating consequences for the future of European civilization. Churchill basically sacrificed Britain for Jewish interests.

As a consequence the 2 anti-white (read Jewish controlled political entities) USA and USSR won the war and they could begin destroying the European world with their Auschwitz-story and by implication multiculturalism, first of all the magnificent British Empire (land-lease act).
 
Last edited:
Telegram from an American militaryman describing what really happened during the initial phase of Bolshevism. Read from first hand who populated the initial revolutionary councils. The Germans understood the situation and acted. Unfortunately for all the white people on this planet, there was still this miserable island for the coast of mainland Europe, whose population had lost control of their own government[/URL]...

< snip >

Churchill bought and paid for by the Jews. With devastating consequences for the future of European civilization. Churchill basically sacrificed Britain for Jewish interests.
.
So in other words -- the Holocaust never happened, but those damn Jooos deserved it anyway.

BTW, are you ever going to apologize for lying that "doubting the Holocaust is criminalized in most of Europe, even if all you dispute are the numbers?"

Because everyone can see how you turned ran from my last post documenting your mendacity on the topic along with your lame attempt to re-frame the question.
.
 
Are we then to take it that you are never going to apologize for lying that "doubting the Holocaust is criminalized in most of Europe, even if all you dispute are the numbers?"

I hope you noticed that the statement originally was made by Paul Craigh Roberts?

So why do not you make yourself useful and make a nice little table showing the countries that according to you are part of Europe, their population size and the ones that have H-word denial laws in plays. Add all the figures up and back your claims up with some proof.

Success!

Meanwhile the more serious characters here will continue the investigation of the H-word rather then side-issues TSR comes up with.
 
I hope you noticed that the statement originally was made by Paul Craigh Roberts?
.
Posted by *you*, and which you then spent several posts attempting to defend before running away.

Making it *your* lie, since your own sources contradicted you, and since they were your sources one can reasonably conclude that you were familiar with them.
.
So why do not you make yourself useful and make a nice little table showing the countries that according to you are part of Europe, their population size and the ones that have H-word denial laws in plays. Add all the figures up and back your claims up with some proof.
.
As I have explained before:
.
Let's take a look at the original quote again, shall we:
Most of Europe has already criminalized doubting the Holocaust. It is a crime even to confirm that it happened but to conclude that less than 6 million Jews were murdered.
.
None of the cited laws outlaw doubt, most do not mention the Holocaust, nor are any specific numbers mentioned in any of them.

The quote is not limited to members of the EU, not contingent on population numbers, nor is it a broad statement about genocide.

It is a knowing untruth for 9/11 to repeatedly try to suggest otherwise. Rational people understand that telling such untruths is called lying, and is generally frowned upon in polite society.
.
So, let's break this down to make 9/11's mendacity even more apparent.

This quote makes several claims -- none of which it is *my* responsibility to do more than require 9/11 to support:

Most of Europe (which 9/11 dishonestly tried to change to the EU, and when that was pointed out tried to claim was about population numbers.)
... already criminalized doubting the Holocaust (which 9/11 attempts to conflate with Holocaust denial)
... It is a crime even to confirm that it happened but to conclude that less than 6 million Jews were murdered. (None of the laws cited by 9/11 mention specific numbers.)
.
.
Thank you, my tearing apart of your lie was very successful -- unless *you* want to make a list of the countries in *Europe* (not the EU,) another list with those laws you claim outlaw doubt (be prepared to support this claim with citation to the actual law,) and show that the latter number is at least half + 1 of the former and cite even a single law which specifically mentions numbers. I'll even accept a single conviction for which the death toll was the only issue.
.
Meanwhile the more serious characters here will continue the investigation of the H-word rather then side-issues TSR comes up with.
.
Who made that initial post again?

And this is very relevant to your attempts to apologize for the crimes of the Nazi regime -- why should anyone engage in "serious discussion" with you when you insist on lying about this? Your credibility is very much at issue, especially given your history of the lie and run, move the goalposts, change the subject and then repost after a bit as if the argument had not been shredded.

I mean, you certainly should not try to pretend you are serious about discussion with habits like those...

I'm also still waiting for your apologies for your continued personal attacks
.
 
Last edited:
9/11 guy running away from points again? Surprising. So, will you acknowledge that you're wrong about why a small amount of people at Auschwitz received medical treatment?
 
Do they really? Got a link? Just want to be sure you're not, you know, making stuff up again.

The figures were from the top of my head, here is the real score:

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/NationalIQs.aspx

I have to apologize to the Portugese, there are a tad smarter than the British after all. And yes, the Brits are not the dummest around, but their score is nevertheless not very impressive. Hitler's idea that the British constitute the master race as well was way off the mark, a fatal mistake. USA has a score of 100.

The master race is to be found elsewhere. :D
(In line with the relative strength on this forum where my Anglo opponents do little more than 'Nazi'-screaming)

Not difficult to understand that the UK and the USA do not stand a chance in hell against a group of people with an average (verbal) IQ of 115 like the Jews have. Also it becomes clear that Germany initially did have a chance but that they in the end where overwhelmed by a bunch of dummies outnumbering them 7:1. (Russia has an average IQ of ca. 100, like the US).

Again I post this link about British veterans who basically say that they fought on the wrong side. Where is Hitler when you need him, they seem to ask.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html
 
Last edited:
I hope you noticed that the statement originally was made by Paul Craigh Roberts?

You repeated the statement. You agreed with it. You´ve made similar statements all over this thread. How *********** retarded do you think everyone else here is that you think we don´t understand this?

Meanwhile the more serious characters here will continue the investigation of the H-word rather then side-issues TSR comes up with.

Translation from Dutch: dishonest Nazi-worshipping scum will continue to tell lies, with an extra helping anti-semitic hate-mongering thrown in for fun.
 
The figures where from the top of my head, here is the real score:

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/NationalIQs.aspx

I have to apologize to the Portugese, there are a tad smarter than the British

Unsurprising. Another false assertion from the Lying Dutchman. Way to go for finding some up-to-date research btw:

Source of the info you linked to:
From V. Buj, Person. & Individ. Diff., Vol. 2, pp. 168 to 169, 1981Subjects >16 yrs. old tested on the Cattell Culture Fair Test 3 (16 SD), standardized in the USA (IQ=100).


Oh, btw:
Not difficult to understand that the UK and the USA do not stand a change in hell against a group of people with an average IQ of 115.

How do you get an average IQ of 115 from a list where the highest value is 109? (Or was in 1981).
 
Unsurprising. Another false assertion from the Lying Dutchman.

I already said it was from the top of my head. I could have ignored you but I did a little bit of searching which confirms that Britain is indeed not too bright. Makes sense after reading your one line posts with zero contributions in trying to solve the H-word riddle.


How do you get an average IQ of 115 from a list where the highest value is 109? (Or was in 1981).

As you can see for yourself, the Jews are not listed. The figure of 115 for the Jews originates from my copy of the Bell Curve.
 
Last edited:
Unsurprising. Another false assertion from the Lying Dutchman. Way to go for finding some up-to-date research btw:
.
Not to mention that zie offers a *single* data point in support of a claim of "consistently lowest..."

Denier "scholarship" in action once again
.
 

I notice that this post has nothing whatsoever to do with the Holocaust, and that you continue to ignore my question. So, will you acknowledge that you're wrong about why a small amount of people at Auschwitz received medical treatment?

And yes, Dirty Shizno is too good for him.
 
You obviously did not followup on my advice to 'read on'. You even quoted 'read on' yourself.

read on what, was there serious evidence I missed, what was it?

And do you oversee all the 100,000s of messages that have been send? Of course not. I repeat what I have said before. I have no idea where 99% of the classmates and neighbours of my youth are. According to your logic they must have been gassed.

If these classmates and neighbors were forced from their homes and gun point, rounded up and shipped accross Europe for what was at best slave labor and were THEN never heard from again, you would have an argument.

Since this did not happen, all you have is a strawman.
 
Yes, I did indeed try to debate with you.

Then I read the rest of the thread.

It's impossible to debate with you. We are all using arguments and evidence that you already considered (and rejected) replacing it with some bizarre anti-Semitic fantasy which has gone so far that you really do appear to believe it completely.

It's like trying to convince someone on LSD that unicorns don't exist, except that you didn't even use drugs (and thus have no excuse.)

I know you didn't start this thread (as in actively, passively sure), but you really are bringing all of this upon yourself.

What's hilarious is that I saw an image on the 10 most common ways that people badly try and debate on the internet (on Cracked.com of all places). You've done all of these. I ignored them at the time in favour of trying to convince you, but that is clearly impossible, this is your religion.

Most of the other posters just insult you and I'm beginning to think they had the right idea all along.

The only consolation is that nothing really changes here, I'm learning more and more about how to form an argument and you're still the "LAST FREE MAN"(tm). Everyone has the exact same beliefs and ideals they entered with. Everyone 'wins'.

So I guess I'll leave this thread for good now, have fun 9/11, have a life not too consumed with fear, and try to stay out of a German prison. Toodles <3
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom