9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

[Moss]

Argument from incredulity noted. Got anything else? And neither do I need nor want to sell you something. Unlike these regular ads by the Holocaust Denial Industry.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Argument from incredulity noted.

This is how Moss responds after he is cornered with the observation that hundreds of Hungarian Jews got medical treatment in Auschwitz after a few days before 400,000 of them supposedly were gassed at the same location.

You do not mind if I declare victory here, do you Moss?

the Holocaust Denial Industry.

I wonder how much money can be made will sitting in jail?

 

[George 152]

I wonder how much money can be made will sitting in jail?

When you get back I'm sure you will tell us

 

[Uzzy]

Are you English? Then I will explain it to you again, this time slowly...

I am very much aware that Poland has a history before 1800. I was in the Polish Parliament a few years ago. In the main assembly hall they have a not too political correct map of Poland as it once was, much larger than now, encompassing the Baltics and large parts of the Ukraine. Poland once was the largest political entity in Europe.

I had written before your latest post (#4146): "namely invading Poland (a country created as a result of WW1 before which it had not existed since Napoleon for more than a century).". Meaning I was aware it had an existence before Napoleon.

Ah, so you'll stop saying that Poland was a country created in WW1 then? Progress! I will have to inform the scientific community that the Neo-Nazi Proto Brain is infact capable of learning. You've done it so many times before as an excuse to justify Nazi aggression though..

Not that much learning either, given you continue to fail to acknowledge that Auschwitz had multiple camps, which is the most obvious explanation to the fact that some inmates had hospital treatment. Not everyone who went to Auschwitz went straight into the gas chambers. Plenty worked as slave labour, for whom, hospital treatment would sometimes be justified in the eyes of the Nazi overseers.

 

[Moss]

This is how Moss responds after he is cornered with the observation that hundreds of Hungarian Jews got medical treatment in Auschwitz after a few days before 400,000 of them supposedly were gassed at the same location.

You do not mind if I declare victory here, do you Moss?

Well, for all I care you can crow victory as much and as often as you want to. It just doesn't change the fact that the medical treatment of a few Jews doesn't falsify the extermination of the others. Why should it? The reason is stated above and you even repeat it yourself: Because those selected were valuable as workers.

I wonder how much money can be made will sitting in jail?

Gotta ask your chums at VHO. How much are the kickbacks?

 

[Ladewig]

You realize, of course, that just about all the nations you named are/were knit together from ethnically diverse populations inhabiting their own historically separate geographical areas. The USSR and Checkoslovakia neatly seperated back into their pre-WWI states with no bloodshed whatsoever. Yugoslavia, after a decade of turmoil, followed the same path.

At the same time, lots of ethnically "pure" nations have disappeared from the map including but not limited to: Catalan; Genoa; Nubia; and Babylon.

In fact, history teaches us that all nations eventually come to an end. So, it's not so much that diversity guarantees demise, it's that the mere act of existing guarantees demise.

I agree. The examples that weregiven have nothing to do with the "ethnically pure" becoming a minority as untermensch immigrate into the country, so listing them as examples of what will happen to the U.S. is absurdly ignorant.

when even entities like Iraq, Yugoslavia, Chechoslowakia, USSR, Ruanda, etc. fall apart,

I love the use of the word "even;" as if the greatest minds in the world considered these artificial constructs to be part of a new order that would stand for ages.

I am also curious as to why a racist would consider Rwanda to be diverse considering he recognizes no difference between Hutu and Tutsi.

 

[dudalb]

Neutral as I am about the Poland issue, I am not neutral though about the existence of an EU with 500 million mainly white inhabitans + a potential ally of another 250 million or so Slavs,

So the Slavs are not white Europeans??????

 

[9/11-investigator]

I love the use of the word "even;" as if the greatest minds in the world considered these artificial constructs to be part of a new order that would stand for ages.

The word 'even' is used because the ethnic-cultural distance between Czechs and Slovaks, between Hutus and Tutsis, between Croats, Serbs and Bosnians (all ethnic Slavs!), between Shiits, Sunis and Kurds (Iraq, all Muslims) is far smaller than exists between the ethnic groups that inhabits the territory of the US. Already most of the American big cities are slums and no-go areas where whites only can enter at their own peril. Have a look at this list, the worlds best cities are in Europe, not in the US. The US is an accident waiting to happen, Auslaufmodel der Geschichte, a 2nd Soviet Union that forgot to die. 'Fortunately' the Jewish ruling class is ready to keep the mess together, in fact it was the intention from the start to create this mess in order to be able to rule by divide and conquer:

I am also curious as to why a racist would consider Rwanda to be diverse considering he recognizes no difference between Hutu and Tutsi.

Where did I say I that I see no difference between these groups? The genocide happened because 90% of the Ruanda population (Hutus) no longer accepted being ruled by 10% Tutsis. Just like the Germans decided to kick out the Jews out ('Holocaust') because they wanted to avoid being bolshevised by them, like in fact did happen to the less talented Russians.

And is there anybody here who wants to sell us the virtues of the wonderful multicultural society in Israel? Of course not. But you see, that is different. Every regular here will advocate Israel as a Jewish state but in the same breath they will demonize anybody who advocates the same idea for his own country ('neonazi'). Double standards, anyone?

And they still pretend not to understand why they were not really liked throughout history.

Well, learn the lesson again then, I would say.

I will read it all in the newspaper.

 

[dudalb]

Wow, the Lying Dutchman does not like being called a Neo Nazi.
OK, will "Bigoted Anti Semite" do?

 

[9/11-investigator]

Wow, the Lying Dutchman does not like being called a Neo Nazi.
OK, will "Bigoted Anti Semite" do?

You have not been paying attention, have you? I have said repeatedly in the past that it is OK that you call me a neonazi, provided you deliver some halfway sane arguments regarding the H-word every now and then, otherwise you will get the Ignore-Sonderbehandlung. Just as long as you don't call me Jew or American we will get along fine.

Nay, I INSIST being called a 'bigoted anti-semite neo nazi schwein' (and you exposing yourself as a hater in the process).

Or to put it like this: I am completely indifferent about how you call me. You are going to call me names anyway, demonizing has been your core business through the ages, so go ahead. I could not care less. Because by calling me names you auto-identify yourself. And identification has always been the start to real 'changes'. Next stop China.

Goodnight.

 

[dtugg]

I am just a little bit ahead of the pack when it comes to insight in history (WW1, WW2 and the H-word), who did 9-11 and the Jewish dominated power structure in the US.

Oh yes and my admittedly incredible bluntness in expressing these views and the complete absence of even a trace of political correctness. I am more of a prophet than a diplomat to put it mildly.
[rest of insane rant redated]

Wow. The nazi piece of crap is really losing it.

It puts a smile on my face to know that it will die without seeing its dream come true.

 

[Loss Leader]

Just like the Germans decided to kick out the Jews out ('Holocaust') because they wanted to avoid being bolshevised by them, like in fact did happen to the less talented Russians.

I'm not sure you can really call Hitler and his accolytes "talented" when it took them 12 years to move their country's status from "Fairly Poor" to "No Longer In Existence. " I think if they'd had a few more months, they might have been able to achieve "All Dead Here."

 

[Trojan]

http://littlegreyrabbit.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/jews-where-they-shouldnt-be-dutch-jews-in-the-baltics/[/url]

April 16, 1943 Today a rumor is circulating that there are about 19,000 Dutch Jews in Vievis….[later that same day] ….”Just now I succeeded in getting a Jewish sign from a Dutch Jew and a copy of the order of the Reichskommissar for the Occupied Netherlands about Jewish property... (read on).

This is probably the solution of the riddle: Jews from Western Europe being dispersed all over the Reich and the new won territories further East. My own non-Jewish father was a forced labourer himself; he never was permanently settled in a camp but constantly on the move. It will not have been much different with most Jews.

A rumor? Seriously, this is what you think is evidence? 100,000 Jews from your nation are never heard from again, and you think a reported rumor is the answer.

Yet, they never attempted to return home, no messages to family and friends?

 

[little grey rabbit]

1. They were used for disinfection as well, gas chambers were principally used for killing lice and other bacteria on the corpses. Eventually they realised it was faster and more efficient to stick the people in alive.

Zyklon B won't kill bacteria and was only used to kill lice and to control typhus. The very same typhus that ended up ravaging Belsen and other camps in mid 1945.

2. There's tons of anecdotal evidence to say that most victims were told they were going in the showers for disinfection. Some of these rooms could hold 2000 people, do you really think you could force 2000 panicking prisoners into a tiny room that said "DEADLY GAS CHAMBER" on it?

Well, it had a functioning boiler that produced hot water, plumbing and shower heads and drains and in the next room it had a hot air blower that helped dry the inmates after their shower in the next room. So it was such good camouflage that it was impossible to distinguish from a real shower block. It was also one of only two shower blocks from prisoners in the camp (the other one being an identical building along side it).

It's what he said, if you don't want to believe it, fine. I know in many camps it was handled by prisoner details, it may well have been here.
.

Which is why we know that either you (or less likely he) is being economical with the truth.

 

[Skeptic]

I'm not sure you can really call Hitler and his accolytes "talented" when it took them 12 years to move their country's status from "Fairly Poor" to "No Longer In Existence. " I think if they'd had a few more months, they might have been able to achieve "All Dead Here."

In 1943, as city after city was obliterated from the air, the Wehrmacht was being destroyed by the untermenschen in the east, and Germany had long since stopped winning battles in the war, the most famous quote among the population was one from a 1933 speech:

"Give me ten years and you won't recognize Germany".

Two things make me wonder if, despite everything, if Hitler and the Nazis might not well have been literally the Devil's tool.

The first is that the concentration and extermination camps feature horrors that would have made Dante hang up his pen in disgust knowing his description of hell in the Inferno had been amateurish, and far too cheerful and cozy. This makes one wonder if they had insider's information about what hell is really like.

The second is that, traditionally, the devil is said to break his tools -- to destroy anybody foolish enough to join forces with him the minute it's advantageous. This is certainly what happened in Germany -- it was finally destroyed just as the last remnants of the Jews under it were put in the ovens.

 

[little grey rabbit]

In 1943, as city after city was obliterated from the air, the Wehrmacht was being destroyed by the untermenschen in the east, and Germany had long since stopped winning battles in the war, the most famous quote among the population was one from a 1933 speech:

"Give me ten years and you won't recognize Germany".

Two things make me wonder if, despite everything, if Hitler and the Nazis might not well have been literally the Devil's tool.

The first is that the concentration and extermination camps feature horrors that would have made Dante hang up his pen in disgust knowing his description of hell in the Inferno had been amateurish, and far too cheerful and cozy. This makes one wonder if they had insider's information about what hell is really like.

The second is that, traditionally, the devil is said to break his tools -- to destroy anybody foolish enough to join forces with him the minute it's advantageous. This is certainly what happened in Germany -- it was finally destroyed just as the last remnants of the Jews under it were put in the ovens.

You mean these ovens photographed here?
http://littlegreyrabbit.wordpress.com/2010/06/12/knut-baecker-and-the-interior-shots-of-krema-ii/

 

[lionking]

You mean these ovens photographed here?
http://littlegreyrabbit.wordpress.com/2010/06/12/knut-baecker-and-the-interior-shots-of-krema-ii/

You have the right to have your own ridiculous holocaust denial blog, but to call it "skeptical" is a grotesque misuse of the english language.

 

[Thomas]

Thomas, who according to his own admission is 'still in doubt' has at least understood this: stay away from gaschambers. Just follow the instructions that the Germans themselves, in order to save precious Jewish (labour) lives, painted on the door of the only real gaschambers there ever were (for fumugation purposes):

http://library.flawlesslogic.com/dachau.gif

Vorsicht: GAS! (attention: GAS!)
Lebensgefaehrlich (very dangerous)
Nicht oeffnen (do not open)

These gaschambers after the war were pimped to the sinister interpretation they have today, in order to make a bunch of parvenues feel good about themselves.

That's what happened.

But this episode of history is quickly coming to a close.

I think we should erect statures everywhere in Europe for Tim Berners-Lee, who enabled this unstoppable liberation from the H-word.

This is not a strawman, just a simple question: Are you saying that people will always, or very often, rebel in the face of execution?

Because then you have yet to see an execution. Haven't you?

 

[9/11-investigator]

This is not a strawman, just a simple question: Are you saying that people will always, or very often, rebel in the face of execution?

Because then you have yet to see an execution. Haven't you?

Most people would prefer being shot or even hanged over an agonizing death lasting 20 minutes in a gaschamber. So if the gaschamber story were true we should have seen continuous attempts to uprise against the German tormenters. With a few exceptions nothing of the sort happened. Reason: the prisoners merely meekly walked to their work every day in the IG Farben factory.

 

[9/11-investigator]

You have the right to have your own ridiculous holocaust denial blog, but to call it "skeptical" is a grotesque misuse of the english language.

Translation: 'skepticism' is a reserved word. It is another smokescreen to hide the Jewish guiding hand behind it, just like far more significant movements like Bolshevism, Multiculturalism (Boasianism), Freudianism, Young Turks, feminism and Neoconservatism, just to name a few. Skepticism in this case is a (futile) attempt to hide the fact that 9/11 and 7/7 were Mossad operations. The idea is to throw 9/11-truthers on one heap with UFO-gazers and Apollo-deniers. The designers of 9/11 did not foresee the devastating effect of the internet. The blogosphere exploded a few months after 9/11. I myself joined internet forums for the first time in the beginning of 2002. I was still a believer then of the official story.