I think it Majdanek it was called a shower block and since when were soldiers dirtying their hands with moving corpses around?
Even by the mind-boggling stupid official narrative, Cactus (or less probably his great grand uncle) is shown to be knowingly uttering untruths
A shower block, really? You have proof? Must have been an awful deadly shower then. Also how do you expect them to move the bodies around? Conveyor belt?
Your homosexual whatever whatever......? Why on earth mention that?
Like 9/11 said, I feel his theory is one of some sort of Jewish NWO conspiracy. I was wondering where a homosexual, pro-Palestinian managed to fit into this "Jewish Lie" in his theory.
While briefly not logged in I saw this remark from dtugg who is on my ignore list (off-topic, implying that I cannot wait to kill somebody) obviously not removed by the mod.
I have now 5 warnings, all from LashL, who clearly does not like me, all on minor 'offenses', the last one from assuming that TSR had foam on his lips while he uttered a tirade against me, not because I accused him of being a crypto-killer, like dtugg does to me.
Just in case LashL eventually will ban me and kill off the only interesting thread of this forum, I (just in case) say goodbye to my opponents and to wish them much strength for the near future, strength they all are going to need.
I have to admit here, I don't like you, I detest your beliefs and I feel you are arguing more on terms of what you want to happen rather than what there is evidence for having happened.
That said, I don't think you should be banned, that solves nothing, but then I'm not in charge here.
I love this sentence. Cactus understands very well that there is no moral case for blaming the Germans for starting WW2 if one of the victorious allies did exactly the same thing that Germany did, namely invading Poland (a country created as a result of WW1 before which it had not existed since Napoleon for more than a century).
The fact that Poland was a new country is not important to me and I have a moral case against both Nazi Germany and the USSR (and to be fair, I have far more against the USSR than Nazi Germany)
That is why he is trying to attach significance to the fact the USSR indeed invaded Poland 2 weeks later than Germany did (restoring the pre-WW1 situation of Russia bordering Germany and Poland nowhere to be seen). Cactus probably tries to peddle the idea that Russia somehow reacted to the actions of Germany thus making their invasion 'somehow less of an offence'.
The sources I have read seem to attach most significance to the idea of the USSR 'reacting' to the Nazi's invasion, as they were more concerned with limiting Nazi power, rather than 'Lebensraum' as the Nazi's were. Still doesn't mean it was an acceptable reaction.
But even the left-wing/zionist edited Wikipedia admits that there was a secret annex to the Molotov-Ribbentrop treaty preceding the invasion where Germany and Russia agreed to divide Poland between themselves:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov...ibbentrop_Pact
I agree here. And why not? It's not like Germany and Russia were at war here, so there's no reason to escalate the conflict.
As we all know, Britain really started WW2 (I agree here with Patrick Buchanan), allegedly to help Poland but in reality aiming only for Germany and not for Russia, their later 'galant ally'. WW2 was never about Poland but about Jewish financial circles and politics not liking that Germany had escaped the Jewish grip and had started expelling Jews from Germany. That was the real reason.
As you yourself said, Churchill was the one more aimed at attacking Germany, Chamberlain was a far more peaceful prime minister, Britain declared war because of our treaties (again).
I don't see how Britain could have started WW2. Germany and Russia started the European theatre and it was Japan that principally started the Pacific theatre.
As for the Jewish thing, you've provided no evidence, so I have to ignore it.