Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
It makes no difference to me whether it is a person or the environment that is forcing me to do something. In either case I work to change that force.
And that work your doing? It's...... ???
It makes no difference to me whether it is a person or the environment that is forcing me to do something. In either case I work to change that force.
Oh, yeah ! Labor unions have always been at the forefront of suicide prevention..
If you don't count the dissolution of a large work force like the air traffic controllers...
... to change the force, of course!And that work your doing? It's...... ???It makes no difference to me whether it is a person or the environment that is forcing me to do something. In either case I work to change that force.
All right... all right... but... apart from the five day work week, the 40 hour work week, no child labor, overtime, 8 hour days, the aqueducts, roads, irrigation, sanitation, medicine, wine, fresh water, education, public baths and public order... what have the unions done for us?no, but they gave us the five day work week, the 40 hour work week, no child labor, overtime, 8 hour days etc.
Maybe you want to read that article you linked to again. You seem to have missed the point I mentioned earlier, that THE WORKERS THERE ARE UNIONIZED, making much of this thread absurd to at least the fourth power...
no, but they gave us the five day work week, the 40 hour work week, no child labor, overtime, 8 hour days etc.
Let's say there are two companies. The workers at Company A have a 40 hour work week, are paid 1000 dollars a month, can talk to co-workers while working their 8 hour shift, can walk on the company street alone if they want, and can go to a union representative if their boss makes them clean a toilet as punishment.
The workers at company B have a 60 hour work week, are paid 300 a month, can't talk while working their 12 hour shift, can't walk on the company street alone if they want, and have no recourse if their boss makes them clean a toilet as punishment.
Now please answer these questions honestly:
In you were forced to bet $1000 on which company's workers would likely have the higher suicide rate over a period of 10 years which company would you bet on? A, B, Either one because the odds should be the same.
Also in your opinion would the workers of company B be more likely to get the same working conditions of company A with or without union representation?
Has DOC boy presented any evidence for any of his assertions yet?
If you answer my 2 questions about company A and B you'll get your evidence. I doubt you'll respond to those questions.
That's kind of like saying the right for women to vote did not come about because of the actions of women but because of legislation.Legislatures did those things; they did not come about because of collective bargaining.
Nowhere in the article does it say the workers at that company are unionized. In fact someone in here already admitted they aren't after looking into it.
The series of apparent or attempted suicides has shaken the management of China's largest electronics manufacturer. Liu Kun, 40, who calls himself the director of media relations, goes around in a sweat-soaked shirt. He avoids the word "factory," preferring the word "campus" - as if Foxconn were a university. In a battery-driven golf cart - steered by Chen Hongfang, second in command at the company union, which is controlled by the Communist Party - Liu shows a visitor around the palm-lined streets. They want to prove how good the workers have it.
<snip>
I find it abhorrent, myself, and refuse to buy products which are made by exploited workers if I can help it (Sadly, I often can't), but I seem to be a minority in thinking it's wrong to cause death and suffering for my own vanity.
How do you, personally, determine which labourers are exploited? Do you lump all Chinese producers into one big negative bundle, or do you have a ratings service or consumer watchdog organization that you go to?
Same question: Workers in India
Same question: Workers in Viet Nam
Same question: Workers in Bangladesh
Same question: Workers in Indonesia
Same question: Workers in Lesotho
Same question: Workers in Guatemala
Same question: Workers in Mexico
Not to mention Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, The Philippines, Korea, Bolivia, Brasil, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Turkmenistan, Jordan, ......
I said exploited workers, that is a term which applies to all workers, which is why I only buy products which are union made in the United States or Canada if I can help it, although European products will also work in a pinch. The only time I don't have a choice is electronics, which are almost never made by non-exploited workers these days.
Also, I noticed you're in Hong Kong. Do you profit off exploitation (Which I assume, judging from these questions and your perfect English) or are you just an especially sociopathic and well connected Chinese person?
China is not a nice place to live or work
Legislatures did those things; they did not come about because of collective bargaining. If unions wanted to limit themselves to voluntary associations of workers who work to influence labor policy, I would be all for it, but I can't stand the hypocrasy that says that when capital colludes to set prices (a cartel) it is morally wrong, but someone it is ok when labor does the exact same thing.
How do you, personally, determine which labourers are exploited? Do you lump all Chinese producers into one big negative bundle, or do you have a ratings service or consumer watchdog organization that you go to?
Same question: Workers in India
Same question: Workers in Viet Nam
Same question: Workers in Bangladesh
Same question: Workers in Indonesia
Same question: Workers in Lesotho
Same question: Workers in Guatemala
Same question: Workers in Mexico
Not to mention Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, The Philippines, Korea, Bolivia, Brasil, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Turkmenistan, Jordan, ......
. The only time I don't have a choice is electronics, which are almost never made by non-exploited workers these days.
You are ignoring a rather important point here.
If one employee try to negotiate with the company, he will be told "take it, or leave it" because the company can afford loosing one employee.
If a representative of all the employees negotiate, the company will suddenly have to take him serious as the negotiations will be on even terms.
It is called collective bargaining, try not to confuse it with industry cartels.
And if the industry got together to 'collectively bargain' a pay rate that would be OK too?