Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

roscoe_the_first said:
Oh I don't know. Erm! let me guess. Cleveland?

ignore this it's merely a guess I don't do guesses. Unlike yourself it seems.
Click to expand...

WARNING!! EXTREME GRAPHIC PICTURES OF DECEASED BODIES AND PARTS!! Not for small children, or ignorant twoofies who don't like evidence.

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200042.html


http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200045.html

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200047.html

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200048.html

Now, what were you saying? You sicko.
 
triforcharity said:
WARNING!! EXTREME GRAPHIC PICTURES OF DECEASED BODIES AND PARTS!! Not for small children, or ignorant twoofies who don't like evidence.

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200042.html


http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200045.html

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200047.html

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200048.html

Now, what were you saying? You sicko.
Click to expand...

Sorry didn't see any signs saying Pentagon.

Could have come from anywhere took em five years to produce that.. especially since the observed flight path proves the plane could not have caused the observed damage.

Nice try no banana
 
Last edited:
roscoe_the_first said:
And how far apart are the engines? More than 60 feet.

Nice try no banana.
Click to expand...

How wide is the collapsed section? 60 feet? 70 feet? More than 70 feet? What is all that cribbing doing there on the 1st floor to the left of the collapsed section? Why is it there? What hit the building that was substantial enough to knock out a reinforced concrete and masonry wall yet to not take out the floors above? Isn't JAQing off fun?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Negative. Craig has fulfilled his promises more than any of us could have imagined. Your always vague pseudo-demands are nothing but injured pride. CIT delivered while you sat on your arse spewing vitriol.

I see NSA has 188K views on YouTube alone, and this is not a spooky music kind of video, it demands full concentration. This will not go away and is fringe only in the wishful thinking of certain TruthSims and DebunkSims.
Click to expand...

Nonsense! I repeat..... Nonsense! Craig has fulfilled nothing close to that promise. They have not released the full interviews. They said they would and they haven't. Period. Full stop.

This is not a pseudo demand. Did they or did they not say they were going to release the full body of the unedited tapes/interviews for verification purposes? No hedging, no name-calling, no hemming or hawing - did they or did they not state that?

Since you're not going to answer - the answer is " Yes, they did so promise."

And where is that material? I mean - it doesn't require any editing because it's the frakkin' source material. They don't need signed releases, not as "journalists". So what's holding it up? WHERE ARE THE UNEDITED ORIGINALS????

Put up or shut up, CIT. Where are the unedited interviews from which this mish-mash of cherry-picking was produced?

You usually back saner plays than this, CE. This one has all the hallmarks of a loser.
 
Sam.I.Am said:
How wide is the collapsed section? 60 feet? 70 feet? More than 70 feet? What is all that cribbing doing there on the 1st floor to the left of the collapsed section? Why is it there? What hit the building that was substantial enough to knock out a reinforced concrete and masonry wall yet to not take out the floors above? Isn't JAQing off fun?
Click to expand...

Not a 44 ft high airliner that's for sure. Especially since the airliner never took the path that could cause that damege anyway.
 
Last edited:
Foolmewunz said:
Nonsense! I repeat..... Nonsense! Craig has fulfilled nothing close to that promise. They have not released the full interviews. They said they would and they haven't. Period. Full stop.

This is not a pseudo demand. Did they or did they not say they were going to release the full body of the unedited tapes/interviews for verification purposes? No hedging, no name-calling, no hemming or hawing - did they or did they not state that?

Since you're not going to answer - the answer is " Yes, they did so promise."

And where is that material? I mean - it doesn't require any editing because it's the frakkin' source material. They don't need signed releases, not as "journalists". So what's holding it up? WHERE ARE THE UNEDITED ORIGINALS????

Put up or shut up, CIT. Where are the unedited interviews from which this mish-mash of cherry-picking was produced?

You usually back saner plays than this, CE. This one has all the hallmarks of a loser.
Click to expand...

Already posted them to you but you ignored them. What were you expecting to find?
 
Last edited:
roscoe_the_first said:
Sorry I don't open what could be a virus or tracking cookie
Click to expand...
or something that will destroy your fantasy

pentagonfloolplan1.jpg
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Not a 44 ft high airliner that's for sure. Especially since the airliner never took the path that could cause that damege anyway.
Click to expand...

Not height, width. That was what you brought up. You stated that the pentagon was 77 feet high and that the engines were 60 feet apart. Use your brain and see if you can guesstimate how wide the collapsed section was from that image. Then tell me what knocked out the reinforced concrete to the left of the collapsed section. It's not that hard.

Earn your banana or go off and eat some ants off of a stick old chap.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Sorry didn't see any signs saying Pentagon.

Could have come from anywhere took em five years to produce that.. especially since the observed flight path proves the plane could not have caused the observed damage.

Nice try no banana
Click to expand...

Admitted into court. Admitted into evidence, and not disputed by Moussoui's lawyers.

Nice handwave.
 
Hey Tri, even though he said that he wants evidence that would be sound in a court of law he won't accept that evidence for some reason. I asked him about it 6 pages ago.

This whole thread is a wonderful example of playing "Truther 20 questions".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom