Continuation - Discussion of the Amanda Knox case

Status
Not open for further replies.
capealadin said:
And by the way, I'm not saying police or Mignini. It's the law.
Click to expand...

It's abuse of power. They are attempting to charge her with a crime for defending herself in court. They are going after her parents for simply repeating her testimony.

Should she have been charged for saying she didn't kill Meredith? Is she not allowed to defend herself?

The worldview of this will not be good. People know when they see abuse of power.

You should stop the hatred and look at this with a clear head.
 
It does have relevance, IMO, Bruce. They may get a tougher judge. I pointed out that is what has just happened. And, no one's talking about an argument. I just thought it was interesting the different takes on the police as far as you and Mary were concerned. And, what is patently pbvious, there was no major onspiracy in the polce department. Neither was a mistake made. Last time I checked, they were found guilty. So, very good police work.
 
But, Bruce, you've got the wrong end of the stick. She's not being prosecuted for defending herself. She's being prosecuted for lying when defending herself. And her parents are guilty of heresay.
 
Bruce Fisher said:
It's abuse of power. They are attempting to charge her with a crime for defending herself in court. They are going after her parents for simply repeating her testimony.
Click to expand...
Aren't they going after her because she knowingly provided false information during an ongoing murder investigation?

Should she have been charged for saying she didn't kill Meredith? Is she not allowed to defend herself?
Click to expand...
No, that would have been an acceptable statement, even if it's not true. What is not acceptable is that she charged an innocent man of a crime that she knew was untrue. And that is what she is charged with.

The worldview of this will not be good. People know when they see abuse of power.
Click to expand...
The people will have forgotten all about by the time the next story breaks.

You should stop the hatred and look at this with a clear head.
Click to expand...
You should really try it yourself one of these days.
 
capealadin said:
But, Bruce, you've got the wrong end of the stick. She's not being prosecuted for defending herself. She's being prosecuted for lying when defending herself. And her parents are guilty of heresay.
Click to expand...

You believe that Amanda is guilty. So you believe that she lied when she stated in court that Meredith was her friend and she would never do anything to hurt her. Should she be charged for that too?

Her parents repeated their daughter's court testimony. If there was a court transcriber, is the transcriber guilty too?

Use your head. Pretend for a moment that you don't hate Amanda and her family.

Do you honestly feel that Amanda's parents should be facing charges for repeating their daughter's testimony?
 
Well, Mathew, ACTUALLY, Amanda was proved guilty. Amanda's parents are being sued, because they repeated the lies. Simply because that's what Amanda said. And, there was no proof of her being hit. Everyone in Perugia, said that Amanda and Meredith were not friends. On the contrary. Do I believe her when she says she didn't kill Meredith" ? No, and neither did the court.Most murderers deny they killed. No surprise there. Afriend would have attended the vigil. Not killed for a pizza. Not said****happens. Not said * I hardly knew her, I just want to get on with my life*. With *friends like Amanda, Meredith didn't need enemies.
 
capealadin said:
Well, Mathew, ACTUALLY, Amanda was proved guilty. Amanda's parents are being sued, because they repeated the lies. Simply because that's what Amanda said. And, there was no proof of her being hit. Everyone in Perugia, said that Amanda and Meredith were not friends. On the contrary. Do I believe her when she says she didn't kill Meredith" ? No, and neither did the court.Most murderers deny they killed. No surprise there. Afriend would have attended the vigil. Not killed for a pizza. Not said****happens. Not said * I hardly knew her, I just want to get on with my life*. With *friends like Amanda, Meredith didn't need enemies.
Click to expand...

I think I have proven my point about you. Nothing more needs to be said.
 
Amazer said:
Correct, that would make it bad police work.

The first trial would seem to indicate that the police work was done properly.
Click to expand...

You completely miss the point. If it turns out that Amanda and Raffaele have been wrongly convicted, then the police work would be bad.

I have finished reading through Amanda's appeal. This will be corrected eventually. Like I said, it might take the supreme court but the truth will eventually prevail.
 
Bruce, youv'e proven nothing. Gather your strength for the translation of the Motivation report. Perhaps then you'll see the light of day. Oh, and as for the world view? Last time I checked, no protests, Perugia still full of students. World still moving along. No hue and cry. More written about her hair, actually.
 
capealadin said:
Bruce, youv'e proven nothing. Gather your strength for the translation of the Motivation report. Perhaps then you'll see the light of day. Oh, and as for the world view? Last time I checked, no protests, Perugia still full of students. World still moving along. No hue and cry. More written about her hair, actually.
Click to expand...

I know that you think the motivation is the greatest document ever written. It must be 100% correct.

If the judges are always correct, why do they have appeals?
 
Bruce Fisher said:
You completely miss the point.
Click to expand...
Really?

If it turns out that Amanda and Raffaele have been wrongly convicted, then the police work would be bad.
Click to expand...
No ****, really?

I have finished reading through Amanda's appeal. This will be corrected eventually. Like I said, it might take the supreme court but the truth will eventually prevail.
Click to expand...
Well, if Amanda is innocent then I certainly hope so.

If the quality of the arguments presented in this online debate in favor of Amanda are anything to go by, then i'm not sure that it will lead to the outcome you desire. Let's hope that Amanda's lawyers are better prepared.
 
capealadin said:
Well, Mathew, ACTUALLY, Amanda was proved guilty. Amanda's parents are being sued, because they repeated the lies. Simply because that's what Amanda said. And, there was no proof of her being hit. Everyone in Perugia, said that Amanda and Meredith were not friends. On the contrary. Do I believe her when she says she didn't kill Meredith" ? No, and neither did the court.Most murderers deny they killed. No surprise there. Afriend would have attended the vigil. Not killed for a pizza. Not said****happens. Not said * I hardly knew her, I just want to get on with my life*. With *friends like Amanda, Meredith didn't need enemies.
Click to expand...

Take a deep breath - your grammar, spelling and punctuation are becoming incoherent in your rage. You need to calm down and try to write in proper sentences. It will help to make you look less desperate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom