Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

Stop spamming.

Because if that's all you've got left, you might as well just give up.
 
dtugg said:
He's already speaking against the state, moron. If he was afraid of the NWO he wouldn't have made his crappy movies in the first place. So how come only a fraction of the witnesses your heroes (claimed to have) interviewed are included in their "evidence", retard?
Click to expand...

He didn't know who Craig Ranke was when he made the statement. Now he does, hence the reason he's changed his story.

He's scared.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
With that super-humanly keen perception of yours, surely you noticed all the tents and equipment on the lawn of the Pentagon. You surely also noticed that the section of the Pentagon that collapsed has been removed.

But are you aware of the concept of time and its passage?
Click to expand...

So how did they get all the debris from ring C to the tents outside? Ring D is totally undamaged. Even after having a Boeing 757 going through it.
 
Well Roscoe, you've obviously read my post as you have replied to later ones. What did your incredible investigoogling skill tell you about what was so incredibly *********** stupid about your post concerning why there was no debris in between C and D, or D and E? The answer is quite simple and your own image shows why (and it doesn't matter what date the picture was taken, there was no debris in between them on 9/12/01 either, save some masonry in between D and E obviously).
 
Last edited:
roscoe_the_first said:
So how did they get all the debris from ring C to the tents outside? Ring D is totally undamaged. Even after having a Boeing 757 going through it.
Click to expand...


Holy ****. This lunacy again? Count the windows visible on the D-ring and the C-ring and think about why that number might be different and how it relates to the D-ring being "undamaged".

I won't see your response, though, because idiocy of the caliber you bring is indicative of either trolling or mental illness, and I have an unofficial personal policy to not engage either type.
 
Last edited:
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Holy ****. This lunacy again? Count the windows visible on the D-ring and the C-ring and think about why that number might be different and how it relates to the D-ring being undamaged.

I won't see your response, though, because idiocy of the caliber you bring is indicative of either trolling or mental illness, and I have an unofficial personal policy to not engage either type.
Click to expand...

Aww man. You ruined my fun... :(
 
No wreckage between E and C?

your-own-evidence.jpg


trou1moyenne.jpg


pentagon_sections.jpg
 
A W Smith said:
No wreckage between E and C?
Click to expand...

That was between C and B. The was asking why there was no debris on the roofs between E & D or D & C without realizing that those were roofs over the bottom 2 floors and not courtyards. In other words, more typical laziness by typically uninformed truthers.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Holy ****. This lunacy again? Count the windows visible on the D-ring and the C-ring and think about why that number might be different and how it relates to the D-ring being "undamaged".

I won't see your response, though, because idiocy of the caliber you bring is indicative of either trolling or mental illness, and I have an unofficial personal policy to not engage either type.
Click to expand...

What the Sam Hall are you on about?
 
roscoe_the_first said:
No sometimes I have trouble trying to second guess what an idiot is trying to say to me.
Click to expand...

Yeah, yeah it must be hard to understand that I was talking about your hero when I refereed to him by name when first asking you the question. :rolleyes:

Anyway, why does Ranke only include a fraction of the witnesses he interviewed in his "evidence"?
 
Sam.I.Am said:
That was between C and B. The was asking why there was no debris on the roofs between E & D or D & C without realizing that those were roofs over the bottom 2 floors and not courtyards. In other words, more typical laziness by typically uninformed truthers.
Click to expand...


As illustrated in my third image. The cross section. The first two images showing the wreckage on A E Drive
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Yes I said no wreckage between C and E, that wreckage is between C and B. So Gungadin, tell me what YOU THINK it is?
Click to expand...
You neglected to study the third image. You tell ME what that means?
Oh and I saw Mark Roberts at the bottom, we like Mark Roberts he's fun, he's another one who doesn't have the brains to stop digging when he's in a hole.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you can tell us what Mark Roberts gets wrong in a new thread. You would be the first in five years.


pentagon_sections.jpg
 
Last edited:
roscoe_the_first said:
[qimg]http://i511.photobucket.com/albums/s360/Ligon911/cringholehelicopter.jpg[/qimg]

Tell me about the C Ring hole? Tell me why there's no plane debris in the open sections in between rings E and C? Check out the scupulously clean spaces in between each ring, not a trace of wreckage.

Seems as though the entire 757 and the passenger DNA et al is in the E ring
Click to expand...

So you accept that flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon,
 
A W Smith said:
You neglected to study the third image. You tell ME what that means?
Perhaps you can tell us what Mark Roberts gets wrong in a new thread. You would be the first in five years.


[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/pentagon_sections.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Oh I see, you're telling me that a 757 with a 40 foot tail section went under the roof at 530 mph and left no trace on the roof.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom