Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

roscoe_the_first said:
Nobody saw the plane hit the Pentagon, they saw a plane go towards the Pentagon and then saw an explosion and then put two and two together and made six.

Perhaps you should look at the bit where the eyewitness describe how he saw "THE SECOND PLANE" flying away immediately after hearing the explosion.
Click to expand...

Sean Boger saw it hit the Pentagon.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
No she's embellishing what she saw. the fact that we have a long diatribe to accompany it tells me a lot.

She'd have about 50ms to see the smoke ring
Click to expand...

"At the point where the fuselage hit the wall"

What about that? Was she embellishing then?

Where is the part where she states "the plane lifted UP AND OVER THE PENTAGON"?
 
funk de fino said:
Sean Boger saw it hit the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

Sean Boger says he watched it hit then he hit the deck. Yeh right. Like you watch a 90 ton plane come in right at the side of you and you don't flinch.

Sean Boger saw it come at him from over the Navy Annex, thus making the light pole damage impossible and therefore faked.
 
Last edited:
funk de fino said:
Sean Boger saw it hit the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

Yes he did:

"I just looked up and I saw the big nose and the wings of the aircraft coming right at us and I just watched it hit the building," Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief Sean Boger said. "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building."
Click to expand...
 
Grizzly Bear said:
There's more than 100 witnesses to the Pentagon attack and out of those CIT only interviewed thirteen (13) of them. They use the weakest form of evidence whose strength would come most efficiently from obtaining the collective testimony from the majority of these people, yet feel it's honest to cherry pick from a mere 13 of them. Then the group feels it honest based on selective sampling to make an unproven assertion that all of the physical evidence is planted, showing no interest in corroborating such a claim. Sorry, I don't buy the ignorance act coming from the group.
Click to expand...


There's a reason why i pointed you to this article. Maybe you read it. A few paragraphs into it:

Stefan said:
From the people who demand that these witnesses be ignored and all those who mention them be castigated, you will not find a clear explanation as to why these people were all wrong in such a similar way. Instead you find an argument, which is the central pillar of Arabesques opposition to this research, that there is a VAST body of testimony that directly contradicts these witnesses. There is so much contradictory testimony, the claim goes, that whatever these other witnesses said is quite irrelevant. On the back of this claim he paints a picture of CIT simply ignoring or dismissing this huge body of testimony (often described as hundreds) in order to focus in on just the 13 witnesses they have. This is a commonly repeated claim in certain circles of the online 9/11 truth community, and is surely the source for much of the venom directed both at CIT and those who do not condemn them. But how much truth is there behind it?
Click to expand...


If you don't want to know the answer, don't waste peoples time.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
That's one for the alternate debate currently being conducted on another thread. You people are currently being psychologically analysed. This in fact is an experiment I'll leave shortly to look at the data we've gathered. I came here because we knew I'd get dumb mindless opposition. we will formulate a plan from the data gathered.
Click to expand...

Wow, forget about my car accident question from last night. I'm not sure you should be operating heavy machinery.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Sean Boger says he watched it hit then he hit the deck. Yeh right. Like you watch a 90 ton plane come in right at the side of you and you do nothing.

Sean Boger saw it come at him from over the Navy Annex, thus making the light pole damage impossible and therefore faked.
Click to expand...

He watched it hit the Pentagon. Are you calling him a liar?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Yes Grizzly Bear, that's exactly what they did. Here's another "debunking" of the "Arabesque" article posted earlier. This one was written last July, two years after the original article, by a guy from the UK after request from author "Arabesque". It's well worth reading.

Arabesque stopped posting to his blog a month later and was not seen again afaik. During the last month of his activity he posted several responses to Stefan.
Click to expand...

Will they post their raw video like they said they would?
 
funk de fino said:
He watched it hit the Pentagon. Are you calling him a liar?
Click to expand...

Absolutely not he's a star witness to the plane coming over the Navy Annex and thus confirming the light poles are faked.

He's got false memory syndrome. He hit the deck and put the rest into his minds eye.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom