Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

[funk de fino]

Well since we're talking about American Airways Flight 77, which ALLEGEDLY flew into the Pentagon let us continue with this

OK

Did you look at the passenger list?

Yes

Not one Arab is named. Everyone on the list is accounted for. Probably the most interesting thing about this particular flight is a list of people who are military or have military and weaponry connections.

Lie

Barbara Olson was on Flight 77 we're told. She allegedly used a cell phone (not a cabin phone) twice. At 09:26 she said she was flying very low and over houses.

Are you calling her and her husband liars?

At 09:26 AA77 was not over houses and was definately not low according to the black box data. Explain please?

What height was it then?

Oh and by the way the black box showed that the flight deck had not been entered during the flight. Explain please?

No, it did not. You are not qualified enough to even make that claim. I am, you are wrong.

You are well behind on all this stuff. Its been debunked well before now.

 

[funk de fino]

If a court case is pending yes. In fact I have a camera permanently located in my car for this very purpose. The car manufacturer issued it with the car.

What kind of car would that be then?

 

[roscoe_the_first]

So the cell phone thing is a red herring. Well debunked.



The evidence is all in the Moussaiou trial files

So tell me why not only do the seating arrangements not tie in with those given immediately after the event (and before the wars) but do not tie in with the DNA data issued by a Freedom of Information Act request

Show me.

 

[Quad4_72]

So tell me why that person in the first picture is removing evidence from the scene of a crime. A criminal offense. This single act makes any NTSB enquiry void




Your idea of what constitutes evidence is a little primitive. But I have to say typical.



It is perfectly legitimate to offer the suggestion that he's placing it there.

You asked for evidence of plane wreckage at the Pentagon. I provided it. You then proceeded to do exactly as I predicted and stated that it was planted. You also chose to ignore all other pictures of plane wreckage and coincidentally decided not to comment on the articles in which all of the passengers were identified. Why is that?

 

[funk de fino]

It is perfectly legitimate to offer the suggestion that he's placing it there.

Only to someone who is delusional. You didnt tell me how the lamposts were planted and when? When did they plant all the plane parts?

 

[roscoe_the_first]

OK[/QUO



Yes



Lie



Are you calling her and her husband liars?



What height was it then?



No, it did not. You are not qualified enough to even make that claim. I am, you are wrong.

You are well behind on all this stuff. Its been debunked well before now.

See Pilots for 911 truth. All will be explained to you

 

[funk de fino]

So tell me why not only do the seating arrangements not tie in with those given immediately after the event (and before the wars) but do not tie in with the DNA data issued by a Freedom of Information Act request

Show me.

You lied when you said there were no Arab names on the passenger lists.

They have tested the DNA from samples from rental cars and hotel rooms and matched them to the DNA found at the Pentagon. That DNA is the hijackers. Everyone else is accounted for.

 

[EventHorizon]

It's always a good idea to plant evidence in broad daylight when there are tons of people and cameras around and the whole world is watching due to the magnitude of the event.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

Only to someone who is delusional. You didnt tell me how the lamposts were planted and when? When did they plant all the plane parts?

That's because I don't know old chum.

The lamposts next to Lloyd England's taxi could not have been hit by an aircraft on a flight path north of the CITCO garage.

Sorry old boy but this is not delusional this is a fact.

 

[funk de fino]

See Pilots for 911 truth. All will be explained to you

I am ex UK military. RAF. 12 years as a fast jet technician. The Pilots for Truth are fakes and liars. Captain Bob is a liar and has threatened violanece against non truthers in the past. He also harvests IP address from people who visit the site and harrasses them.

What height was the aircraft at 09:26? You said you knew. Tell me.

 

[lionking]

It's always a good idea to plant evidence in broad daylight when there are tons of people and cameras around and the whole world is watching due to the magnitude of the event.

It's easy with holographic masking.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

It's always a good idea to plant evidence in broad daylight when there are tons of people and cameras around and the whole world is watching due to the magnitude of the event.

Yes it seems so. After all you lot bought the whole lemon.

 

[Hokulele]

You could of course go to Pilots for 911 truth and they'll explain it to you.

*Snerk*

 

[funk de fino]

That's because I don't know old chum.

The lamposts next to Lloyd England's taxi could not have been hit by an aircraft on a flight path north of the CITCO garage.

Sorry old boy but this is not delusional this is a fact.

Do not call me old chum or old boy. Either use my name or dont call me anything.

You have no idea how those 30 foot lamposts could hve been plnated in broad daylight during rush hour. You have no idea how all those thousands of plane parts could be planted in broad daylight?

Seems like you have no idea about anything except lies you have been fed by idiots.

 

[lionking]

That's because I don't know old chum.

The lamposts next to Lloyd England's taxi could not have been hit by an aircraft on a flight path north of the CITCO garage.

Sorry old boy but this is not delusional this is a fact.

"Old chum", "old boy"? I don't believe you are a Pom. These terms haven't been used in decades, even in jest.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

You asked for evidence of plane wreckage at the Pentagon. I provided it. You then proceeded to do exactly as I predicted and stated that it was planted. You also chose to ignore all other pictures of plane wreckage and coincidentally decided not to comment on the articles in which all of the passengers were identified. Why is that?

The guy is moving evidence. this makes any subsequent investigation flawed at best.

 

[funk de fino]

The guy is moving evidence. this makes any subsequent investigation flawed at best.

Not if he is part of the investigation team. Not if it has been marked and catalogued by the investigating team.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

I gave you my take. That it's quite silly to think that the door was never, not once, for any reason whatsoever, during 40 hours of flight operations, opened by anyone. Especially pre-9/11.

PFfT cannot explain why the door never indicated open once over 40 hours either.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

"Old chum", "old boy"? I don't believe you are a Pom. These terms haven't been used in decades, even in jest.

Did I say I was? Are you positing evidence yet again. Seems to be an unfortunate trait of you people.

 

[lionking]

Not if he is part of the investigation team. Not if it has been marked and catalogued by the investigating team.

And the gloves he is wearing suggests crime scene analyst.