WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Can you cite the legal precedent for this claim?A collective punishment is one where innocents people suffer for the actions of others.
Can you cite the legal precedent for this claim?A collective punishment is one where innocents people suffer for the actions of others.
They got better.What's up with this fluctuating body count ? Is this just a miscommunication issue ? This morning it was more than 20, now we seem to be down to nine.
They got better.
Yes, because its a legal term with legal implications. Saying it here on top of the other threads does not make it true.
Yes, because its a legal term with legal implications. Saying it here on top of the other threads does not make it true.
No, it's not collective punishment.
We Jews do not collective punish the Palestinians we collective persecute them. They really do nothing wrong except live in wrong land and be inferior to we Jews. We not attack pretend aid ship for punishment but for persecution. We must keep boot on head of Palestinians and stop them from flourish until they disappear from Land of Israel. IDF do well today. Turkish sailors inferior also.
Can you cite the legal precedent for this claim?
Is there really any need to do that? Shouldn't it be obvious? Not all of the people living in the West Bank are guilty of terrorism against Israel, but they are treated as though they are. Sounds kind of similar to a collective of people being punished for the actions of others...doesn't it?
There's also that covert nuclear weapons program.
Covert? How do you know about it?
I can't wait to hear what the journalists on board the ship have to say about how the events unfolded, just as soon as Israel releases them from detention that is...
Because information leaks over the years. Obviously there is Mordechai Vanunu's stuff. Various statements from the US goverment which presumably has ways of finding out and actions by Isreal that make no sense in any other context.
So his saying that nobody documented it is wrong. Why are you defending him?
"Collective punishment" has a meaning and a connotation. The meaning is a war crime when someone is held legally responsible and punished for a crime committed by another.
The way it is being used here is when anyone suffers due to hostilities instigated by another party, but you're still trying to use the term with a war crime connotation.
It's quite weaselly.
I've just closed another thread on this subject for bickering and incivility. I'm refraining from editing this one right now, but keep rule 0, rule 11, and rule 12 firmly in mind before you post.Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic Posted By: Tricky