• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged David Chandler (ae911) sez "WTC7 was in free fall part of the time"

Resolver said:
How about this one??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8W-t57xnZg
Click to expand...

There is no evidence for thermite or explosives. The only expert on the WTC is Robertson and he calls all these idiots ideas nonsense. Robertson designed the structure of the WTC, not the pretty face, the structure which failed on 911.

You posted proof 911 truth is delusional for 8 years and the stupidity is saved on the Internet forever.

This video is filled with lies; anyone can find them if they research.

The core can't stand without the shell and floors! He said the core would not fail. This is funny, he says the fires are not big! lol, when is the last time he saw a fire started with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel, the heat energy equal of 315 TON of TNT.

You do understand this video is delusional nonsense.
 
Resolver, this might be new information for you, but here goes. Lots and lots and lots of times, 9/11 "Truth" proponents find the JREF forum. They sign up. They "just ask questions." It gets old. If there is anything specific you want to discuss, just say it. Please don't link youtube videos and say things like "debunk this" or "what do you think of this" - it just gets old, and you aren't going to be happy with the responses.
 
Last edited:
ktesibios said:
If you [ay attention to what you're watching, you will notice that in every case the blasts and material ejections ("squibs") precede the beginning of collapse and that the structures do not collapse from the top down.
Click to expand...

Not only that, but all the windows are removed prior to CD. Had the WTC been an explosive CD, it would have rained glass all over lower Manhattan just prior to the collapse.
 
Yes please

NutCracker said:
Let us play a different game. How about you building your case for your alternative narrative. Please lay out all the relevant facts on the table and show us, using valid logic, how that leads to your conclusion.
Click to expand...

Resolver, the place to post your hypothesis that explains the events of 9/11/01 is right here.
 
@Wildcat I'm not trying to prove a CT. My CT friends post this crap to me and I want to hear intelligent responses from people who have looked at this a lot and might have engineering backgrounds.

@Wildcat LOL at Ricky Astley - Never Gonna Give You Up

@ktesibios I have seen some flashes and ejections below the failing point of the structure, as it falls. Not as many as in some demolitions, but if I were to argue the CT case, I might point out that a minimal use of explosives should be used in WTC 1 to avoid looking like a demolition

@beachnut I'm not a demolition expert, so I'm not sure if in real demolitions the dust ejects faster because it is ejecting out explosives along the edge of the building, whereas an (ignorant?) CT might argue (besides this video) that here explosives were mainly in the interior near the cores etc. where it would have time to slow down.

@beachnut 200 2000 pound bombs does sound like a lot! 315 tons of TNT does too :)

@16.5 Haha, I'm just trying to get you guys riled up. It seemed to work.

@nutcracker @carlitos I don't have a theory. I'm asking your to debunk some guy that supposedly is/was an MIT professor.
 
Last edited:
Resolver said:
@Wildcat I'm not trying to prove a CT. My CT friends post this crap to me and I want to hear intelligent responses from people who have looked at this a lot and might have engineering backgrounds.

@16.5 Haha, I'm just trying to get you guys riled up. It seemed to work.

Now, Debunk this!

MIT engineering professor(?) disputing theory of collapse??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8W-t57xnZg
Click to expand...

Your "friends" are 911 Truthers and Holocaust deniers?

RRRIIIGGGHHHHHTTTTTT.
 
@16.5 Please don't call me a liar. It is an irrelevant point anyhow.

I found the MIT video myself while looking into my friends' first video.

Point is, I have some videos I would like to hear intelligent responses from people that studied the subject and preferably have a professional background in related fields.
 
Last edited:
@Resolver

If you're serious, try this.

1 - Select one claim from whatever video you are watching.
2 - Plug it into the 9/11 Power Debunker
3 - Profit!1!!

But honestly, my :bs: is in the red.
 
Last edited:
@BigAl Thanks man! I suppose the sources he refers to that allegedly claim that some big wig engineers are against pancake or whatever 'official' collapse theory is also bunk? Asking for real. Not being sarcastic.
 
carlitos said:
If you're serious, try this.

1 - Select one claim from whatever video you are watching.
2 - Plug it into the 9/11 Power Debunker
3 - Profit!1!!

But honestly, my :bs: is in the red.
Click to expand...

As you can see, I'm new to this forum, and this has not been an issue I've studied much. Actually, I'm not a big forum user, in general. I didn't know about your 9/11 Power Debunker.

Please don't call me a liar. It is not cool, not based on evidence, and not really relevant to my questions.
 
Last edited:
DavidJames said:
Resolver
What is so hard about the quote button.
Have you done any research on your own? Are you aware of the search function?
Click to expand...

Sorry, as I said, I'm not a big forum dude and got lazy to quote a bunch of different things and don't have the experience it takes to tell me that it is really bad to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom