• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proof of reincarnation

psychicwonderer628 said:
See, there's that open mindedness I mentioned...congratulations, this website is everything I thought it might be.
Click to expand...
I'm as open-minded as the next skeptic. It just takes more than anecdotes of fantasy, fallacies of reason, false data and smarmy condescendency to impress me.
 
psychicwonderer628 said:
Yes, then we can agree it is consciousness. I believe it is the essence.
So you don't believe in any afterlife at all?
Click to expand...


We can't agree on anything, I suspect.

Your 'belief' is irrelevant.

No, I don't, you dolt. There is no afterlife.

There is no soul.

There is no god.

There is nothing whatsoever supernatural.

Woo is wrong.

Shed your superstitions.

Read a good science book.
 
Last edited:
psychicwonderer628 said:
Yes, hypnotherapists CAN plant suggestions, whether they mean to or not. However, there are skilled practitioners who do not. Can you deal with the possibility that Dr Newton is skilled enough to not suggest anything? I mean, how can someone suggest some unknown person who died on the Kansas prairie in 1870? It isn't like every dead person has well known facts about themselves floating around in the ether.
Click to expand...

Ether?
 
Fnord said:
I'm as open-minded as the next skeptic. It just takes more than anecdotes of fantasy, fallacies of reason, false data and smarmy condescendency to impress me.
Click to expand...
Once again I'll ignore the drivel and weak attempts at insult by the previous posters. Such immature posting seems all too common on this website. But I'll respond to your post by saying that if one can accept the theory of evolution based on the evidence of it, then one can accept life after death based on the evidence out there. And that's why in human history from Shamanism of 40,000 years ago to the present day more people have believed in it than those who haven't. Anyway that's it for me on this thread I've said my piece. Feel free the rest of you to continue your skeptical doubting under the guise of "science", but don't get too upset over it throwing your toys out of your cots with extraordinary critical analysis like "idiot", "dolt", "bollocks","woo-woos", "religious","crap", "garbage","rubbish","new-agey","dodgy" etc :rolleyes:
 
psychicwonderer628 said:
Have you actually read the books? What makes you think he doesn't keep quiet? Any proof of him suggesting things?
Click to expand...

Hi, it is on the person making a claim to support the claim, thus the burden of proof rests on the claimant.

So to support that there is some sort of communication with past lives, I would mainly want for them to eliminate other possibilities and demonstrate actual transmission of information.

People have these experiences during the 'hypnotherapy', the validity of transmission of information is a separate issue. So yes people may have an experience, but is it of past lived? That needs some better demonstration.
 
gerg said:
Once again I'll ignore the drivel and weak attempts at insult by the previous posters. Such immature posting seems all too common on this website. But I'll respond to your post by saying that if one can accept the theory of evolution based on the evidence of it, then one can accept life after death based on the evidence out there. And that's why in human history from Shamanism of 40,000 years ago to the present day more people have believed in it than those who haven't. Anyway that's it for me on this thread I've said my piece. Feel free the rest of you to continue your skeptical doubting under the guise of "science", but don't get too upset over it throwing your toys out of your cots with extraordinary critical analysis like "idiot", "dolt", "bollocks","woo-woos", "religious","crap", "garbage","rubbish","new-agey","dodgy" etc :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Hi, there are those of us who are trying to communicate with you Gerg, you get used to the noise ratio after a while.

Just because people believe something does not make it valid, that is the fallacy of populism.

I notice you still haven't actually presented evidence that there is transmission of information from past lives. When you present the evidence, then we can evaluate it. :)

Other popular concepts are slavery, racism and the subjugation of women, so a sceptic takes the evidence and evaluates it, no one has asked you to accept evolution, you need to base your belief of the data, which you haven't learned enough to discuss. And so far you haven't presented the data on reincarnation for us to discuss.

BTW: I find IGNORE a useful way to reduce the noise ratio. I will place people on IGNORE for a week and then take them off.
 
Last edited:
gerg said:
Once again I'll ignore the drivel and weak attempts at insult by the previous posters. Such immature posting seems all too common on this website. But I'll respond to your post by saying that if one can accept the theory of evolution based on the evidence of it, then one can accept life after death based on the evidence out there. And that's why in human history from Shamanism of 40,000 years ago to the present day more people have believed in it than those who haven't. Anyway that's it for me on this thread I've said my piece. Feel free the rest of you to continue your skeptical doubting under the guise of "science", but don't get too upset over it throwing your toys out of your cots with extraordinary critical analysis like "idiot", "dolt", "bollocks","woo-woos", "religious","crap", "garbage","rubbish","new-agey","dodgy" etc :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I suggest that you look up the word drivel in a dictionary.Asking for for evidence does not constitute drivel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom