• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed All 43 videos "Second Hit"" [Explosion]at WTC 2: Plane or No Plane?

Status
Not open for further replies.
plane.

and i am gonna email my parent's neighbor...to get those photos.

i will put an end to this "no plane" bull **** once and for all.

No you won't, Jammo will wave them away, say they prove no plane and carry on like a zombie, posting videos that show a plane hitting a building and claiming that not what they show.
He's like one of those 70's horror movies where the knife wielding maniac just can't be stopped:eek:
 
Thank you, 240-185, dafydd, fitzgibbon, Thunder, DGM and Carll68.

23 PLANE, 1 NO PLANE.
The sad part (for the "truthers") is 2 or 3 years ago this tally would be 200+ to 2 (Ace Baker was still a member)! It shows that even the "debunkers" don't care to "debunk" the "no-planers" (why would we it's a known FACT* they're nuts*)!

*I had to throw this in so jammonius would know it's true :D
 
I source and back up my claims with video imagery and witness statements.

For example:

"It was jist an explosion."

Cameraman, David Stollick(sp?) 1:01 of Dick Oliver video # 1

And yet, still no answer to my post of why you believe the fireball is in the wrong place, and (According to you....snicker.....:D....cough cough....laughing hysterically.......fart......snort.....) should have started when the nose hit the building.
 
And yet, still no answer to my post of why you believe the fireball is in the wrong place, and (According to you....snicker.....:D....cough cough....laughing hysterically.......fart......snort.....) should have started when the nose hit the building.

Because he believes Flight 175 should've behaved like a Molotov cocktail when it hit the world trade center. Hasn't anyone here seen his epic two-hour presentation? It's quite .... enlightening, erm yeah, I think that's the word.

Andrew Johnson said:
Someone's injected a false story into the system. A false story so blatantly false that everyone believes it.
:eye-poppi

ETA: He's got a lot of others up on YouTube, just google Andrew Johnson 9/11. :)
 
Last edited:
Plane. The same one that is clearly shown in the videos jam keeps posting.
 
And, as it is now apparent we are on a new page, come on lurkers, do your thing. :)

As per your request, I posted. Not only did you not acknowledge my posts, you refused to answer the very simple questions I posed. Your lack of response is noted, as well as your lack of respect.
 
Don't anyone take this as a critique of the idea of a straw poll here - I'm not attacking anyone - but: What do our votes matter? Really? There are over 80 people listed here that personally witnessed the jets hit, and that perspective completely and totally outweighs any argument that any clueless truther can attempt to impose on them. Furthermore, that 80 is only a very tiny sampling of eyewitnesses. It doesn't matter how we vote here, what matters is that there's not only a plethora of witnesses who personally witnessed the impacts and spoke publicly about it, but their testimonies are backed up by the utter mass of positive evidence.

There's no need to beat this into the ground. No planers have already utterly failed to make a case. Here's what one eyewitness to the FL175 impact - Barry Drogin - wrote about no planers years ago:
Most offensive of all, some of these bozos claim that there are no eyewitnesses that actually saw an airplane hit the tower. Here are some facts for you bozos to consider - whenever anyone actually tells you the truth, you omit it from your evidence. I suggest that any readers of this consider that the 9/11 "truth" movement is merely another stupid variation on Holocaust denial.

There is no "No Plane" case to be made. With what is already known and established to be fact, any stance that begins with the notion of no jets having hit is an automatically doomed to failure. Because of that, there's no need to beat this corpse of a subject any more than it has been. Just let the thread die.
 
Don't anyone take this as a critique of the idea of a straw poll here - I'm not attacking anyone - but: What do our votes matter? Really? There are over 80 people listed here that personally witnessed the jets hit,

True, and even if the crash happened at midnight on a moonless night with no eyewitnesses or images we would know to certainty the identity of the plane, it's route and who hijacked it.

The FAA and NORAD knew most of that even before flight 175 hit the South tower.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom