• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proof of reincarnation

Resume said:
What's wrong with you? Evolution through natural selection explains the facts behind the diversification of species. Have you read nothing concerning biology?
Click to expand...

IANG* but I can tell you the answer is "no." At best, he will have skimmed through some biology texts looking for sentence fragments he can take out of context.


*I Am Not Gerg
 
gerg said:
Just because something is testable doesn't make it real or true..and more importantly, so far the tests have concluded "evolution is not a fact" end of story. move on.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Like so far the tests have concluded that the earth isn't round.
Seriously, where did you learn about evolution?
 
Resume said:
Would you like to discuss the accurate predictions using natural selection (think tiktaalik among others) or would you like to wave the white flag now?
Click to expand...
Straight from Wiki > "For all these features, however, it is clear that Tiktaalik was simply a fish; its lobed fins appear better suited for swimming in water rather than crawling on land, and other fish, such as the Coelacanth, were also thought to be "missing links" until they were discovered to be some form of fish. It has been placed by evolutionists alongside Archaeopteryx, but they fail to see that neither animal was a transitional form; archaeopteryx was a full bird, tiktaalik was a full fish. "

Give it up resume, you've got nothing.
 
Gerg where did you learn about evolution? Seriously.
'Good' links? Is a 'good' link one which supports your ignorant ideas about evolution?
Straight from wiki?
In the immortal words of John Macinroe:
you cannot be serious.
 
kerikiwi said:
Gerg where did you learn about evolution?
Click to expand...


Assumes facts not in evidence.


kerikiwi said:
In the immortal words of John Macinroe:
you cannot be serious.
Click to expand...


Now we're talking.


Hook.jpg
 
Off topic, I know, but it concerns a rather annoying post above and it needs a reposte!

The best read on Darwinian evolution is Dawkins's "The Greatest Show on Earth"

Dawkins right up front in the book deals with the definition of "theory" very eloquently, so those who continue to attempt to downgrade the validity of evolution on the basis that it is only a theory should read this book now for their education.
 
Explorer said:
Off topic, I know, but it concerns a rather annoying post above and it needs a reposte!

The best read on Darwinian evolution is Dawkins's "The Greatest Show on Earth"

Dawkins right up front in the book deals with the definition of "theory" very eloquently, so those who continue to attempt to downgrade the validity of evolution on the basis that it is only a theory should read this book now for their education.
Click to expand...


The only trouble is, my friend, that you may be assuming that those who resort to the dishonest tactic you describe have any interest in educating themselves. I don't think that applies here.
 
Explorer said:
Off topic, I know, but it concerns a rather annoying post above and it needs a reposte!

The best read on Darwinian evolution is Dawkins's "The Greatest Show on Earth"

Dawkins right up front in the book deals with the definition of "theory" very eloquently, so those who continue to attempt to downgrade the validity of evolution on the basis that it is only a theory should read this book now for their education.
Click to expand...
Pfft. Obviously you haven't read "Eve's Bites" by Ian Wishart. Totally discredits Dawkins on every single one of his assertions.
 
Akhenaten said:
Get back to the topic, gerg. How does "Eve's Bites" by Ian Wishart totally discredit Dawkins?
Click to expand...
Where do I start?!! How about you read it and then put forward anything you don't agree with for starters..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom