• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proof of reincarnation

Sledge said:
Please stop talking such utter tripe, gerg. Consider the case of Barry Marshall. His alternative theory was accepted once he had proof for it and he won a Nobel Prize. Hardly "outcast."
Click to expand...
Get with the program Sledge we're talkin Reincarnation and Evolution!
 
Marduk said:
and another lie, youve posted one religious website after another and your only attempt to counter claim anything was to claim that the eye could not evolve without a designer.

lying is a sin and you are a sinner then, youre going to hell
:D
Click to expand...
Give me a break dude and keep your bogus religious sin ideas to your self.
 
gerg said:
Give me a break dude and keep your bogus religious sin ideas to your self.
Click to expand...

give us a break
1. do some studying so that youre not spouting ignorance in every single post
2. learn from the people who do know what you don't. i.e. pay attention you might learn something
3. stop posting anti science religious websites at the same time claiming you havent read the bible, thats just an obvious lie and makes you a complete hypocrite

then maybe you'll get a break, til then everyone here is going to carry on repeatedly ramming the E in JREF up your hole.
thats what this website is for, for every ignoramous posting like you theres ten other people who are seeing your opinion shown to be trash and learning by example

:D
 
gerg said:
I read it and it's not quite right. Reason being is that the Scientific community is fairly tight-knit, and Scientists don't/can't easily offer alternative theories for fear of being outcasted or branded a "wooist" or similar.
Click to expand...

No need to capitalize "scientific" or "scientists". They're just folks. Actually, there is little cohesion, or 'tight-knittedness', in my experience. The theoreticians have a friendly disdain for the experimentalists, and pretty much vice-versa. One thing that holds a discipline together is the "theory", which has been proven to account for the facts in question. Without a theory, it is chaos, so scientists must operate within the current theoretical considerations or have a pretty good reason not to.

Of course if a scientist says, let's just throw away the theory which is the basis for our current research, he will be considered a crackpot unless he has good evidence for his statements. In scientific research circles, you don't get to merely make assertions and expect others to believe or support you. There is a culture, for sure, which presupposes that fellow colleagues know the rules of the scientific method, and one would not last long if it seemed that this was being abused.

You seem to have an incorrect image of the actual nature of the business. Sure, there are some jerks who just attack anyone with a new idea, but they seldom last in the fast lane. Quite honestly, it is a beautiful thing to sit in a coffee shop, or a seminar, and hear professional astronomers, physicists or chemists discuss their ideas. It is congenial, and argumentative and well, just fun. I get to do this on a regular basis.
 
Marduk said:
stop posting anti science religious websites at the same time claiming you havent read the bible, thats just an obvious lie and makes you a complete hypocrite
Click to expand...
Why would I lie about not having read the Bible?? Coming up with ***** like "obvious lie" & "complete hypocrite" doesn't do you or this webiste any credit.
 
gerg said:
Why would I lie about not having read the Bible?? Coming up with ***** like "obvious lie" & "complete hypocrite" doesn't do you or this webiste any credit.
Click to expand...

says the man posting religious woo websites and who makes pointless statements showing his religious beliefs which have repeatedly been debunked but pretends they haven't.
the lying hippocrite shoe fits you, trying to lie your way out of the obvious fact that it fits you well isn't working
:D
 
Last edited:
Marduk said:
says the man posting religious woo websites and who makes pointless statements showing his religious beliefs which have repeatedly been debunked but pretends they haven't.
the lying hippocrite shoe fits you, trying to lie your way out of the obvious fact that it fits you well isn't working
:D
Click to expand...
Marduk, once again, I'm not religious...How silly do you feel?
 
gerg said:
Marduk, once again, I'm not religious...How silly do you feel?
Click to expand...

Gerg, do you deny posting religious websites
do you deny using arguments made famous by I.D.
do you deny that all the way through this thread you have been making bible based arguments
if youre not religious have you perhaps been channeling Ken Ham
:p
 
Last edited:
gerg said:
Reincarnation I admit is still a theory at this stage. Like as in the theory of evolution..
Click to expand...
.
The only significant difference being that the Theory of Evolution has evidence that supports it.

Reincarnation, on the other hand, has only poorly-conceived fantasies to back it up.
 
gerg said:
Get with the program Sledge we're talkin Reincarnation and Evolution!
Click to expand...

Then you were off topic in posting:
Reason being is that the Scientific community is fairly tight-knit, and Scientists don't/can't easily offer alternative theories for fear of being outcasted or branded a "wooist" or similar.
Click to expand...
So, which of your two posts was off topic?
 
gerg said:
That's what I've been saying all along theories are not facts.. this is getting silly folks.
Click to expand...

Yes, but that is not a rebutal to a discussion of theory, so your use of it as some sort of argument against evolution is specious.

The theory of nuclear fusion is NOT a fact either, do you think the sun shines and that hydrogen bombs go BOOM?

So what are the facts that support the theory of evolution Gerg? Do you know?


For Gerg:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=176141
 
gerg said:
Evidence that just leaves more questions and debate.

I suggest you study up on Regression Hypnotherapy.
Click to expand...

I suggest politlt that you learn what teh scientific method is and the try to present us with teh data.

Regression Hypontherapy, um sure, and that involves what exactly?

Just Capitalizing the Letters does not mean that there is any Good Data, remember what I asked you before:

What is the data?
What other explanations are there?

What Are The Facts?
 
Paulhoff said:
It is not a scientific theory like evolution, evolution is testable and has been tested, there is no way to test reincarnation.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...

There is, they just don't like the results, since they won't like controls and protocols.

You know like, demonstrate data that someone could not have acquired from other means and is backed by historic records.
 
gerg said:
I read it and it's not quite right. Reason being is that the Scientific community is fairly tight-knit, and Scientists don't/can't easily offer alternative theories for fear of being outcasted or branded a "wooist" or similar.
Click to expand...

Not true and just a weak polemic, if Behe had actual theory and actual data it would matter. But someone who wants to just promote beliefs and doesn't have data will be disregarded.
 
Last edited:
gerg said:
Get with the program Sledge we're talkin Reincarnation and Evolution!
Click to expand...

Get with the program dude and show some critical thinking skills.

So far you have yet to address the ToE but you have linked to two religous web sites.

I wonder what the data of your posts shows?

1. That you do not address the actual theory of evolution.
2. That you link to religous sites.

Thems the facts!
 
gerg said:
I read it and it's not quite right. Reason being is that the Scientific community is fairly tight-knit, and Scientists don't/can't easily offer alternative theories for fear of being outcasted or branded a "wooist" or similar.
Click to expand...

Response in the evolution thread started just for you, as again, this is off topic to the original thread
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom