Merged Silverstein on phone with insurance company about controlled demolition

[carlitos]

timmyg, here is something for you.

the English word appalling using the English suffix -ing
derived from the English word appall
- derived from the Old French word apallir
- - derived from the Old French word pale
- - - derived from the Old French word pal
- - - - derived from the Classical Latin word palus (stake, pile, pole; swamp, marsh)
- derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *pag-
- - derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *pelə-
derived from the Latin word pala (spade; shovel)
- derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *pag-

You are digging yourself a hole here.

 

[funk de fino]

how do you know what I will think in the future?!

I don't know anyone who has seen the collapse of wtc7 and said 'that's OBVIOUSLY not a demolition'
Of all the things that's its obviously not, a demolition isn't one of them.

Stunningly ridiculous.

NIST said WTC7 was a new phenonemon. And also admit that the only hypothesis they have investigated has a very small probability of occurence.

Lie

You're stance on this issue is alarming for a group of people who claim to be crtical thinkers.

I don't know why Larry Silverstein should be automatically immune from the kind of investigation that would normally take place in the event of any kind of crime or castasophe.

That's the best one yet!

 

[Thunder]

I don't know anyone who has seen the collapse of wtc7 and said 'that's OBVIOUSLY not a demolition'

than you clearly do not know many people.

i know lots of folks...and only one of them cares about any of this nonesense, and he is very very emotionally disturbed and thinks the FBI and CIA is "out to get him".

do you think, the FBI and CIA is "out to get you"?

and btw, what is the evidence that Silverstein talked to his insurers about demoliting the building?

"several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers"

who are these police officers and Con-Ed workers? why would they have detailed information regarding private phone calls between Silverstein and his insurers? does that make any sense? it sure doesn't to me.

did YOU look into any of this before you started making accusations??????????????

thought not. typical truther: "don't confuse me with evidence".

 

[Thunder]

So there is a first hand report by a Foxnews debunker that Silverstein was on the phone with his insurance company looking for permission to take down the building?

an unproven allegation.

since when are NYPD officers and Con Ed guys privey to private phone calls between billionaire real-estate owners and their insurers?

I call BS. major BS.

since when did Truthers trust Fox News anyways???????????????????????

 

[Bell]

since when did Truthers trust Fox News anyways???????????????????????

The MSM can't be trust, since they are all war mongering, Bush loving, propaganda machines.

Unless... unless... the MSM mentions something that in the slightest way might, possibly, kind of, be implying that 9/11 was an inside job.

 

[Thunder]

so who were these mystical/magical NYPD officers and Con Ed workers?

how could they possibly know what Silverstein was saying to his insurers?

did ANYONE ever look this up? huh truthers?

thought not. this is why you'all can't get **** done.

Truther: "it doesn't matter who these men were, or whether or not their statements can be proven. all that matters is that they have given ammunition for 9-11 Truth!! Evidence and facts be damned!!!"

 

[beachnut]

... I don't know anyone who has seen the collapse of wtc7 and said 'that's OBVIOUSLY not a demolition'
Of all the things that's its obviously not, a demolition isn't one of them.
...

Let me guess, you don't know any rational people? Do you do drugs? Forget your keys? Just say no, or remember to stop spewing moronic opinions when you are high, or talking to people who are not high.

several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein

You support hearsay with nothing but a failed opinion. Do you know what hearsay is because you don't know what makes up a demolition?

 

[Profanz]

an unproven allegation.

since when are NYPD officers and Con Ed guys privey to private phone calls between billionaire real-estate owners and their insurers?

I call BS. major BS.

since when did Truthers trust Fox News anyways???????????????????????

This is what we know:

The building fell down for a first time in history reason according to NIST.

We know that there were demolition crews on site hours before the collapse. (Blanchard claim)

We Know that it was reported collapsed by two different news agencies before it actually collapsed.

We have Silverstein making the "pull" comment.

We have other WTC buildings that were "pulled" down. (With cables I believe.)

Now we have a report (from a debunker no less) that Silverstien was on the phone considering demolition with his insurance company.

But it's all just a coincidence.

 

[Oystein]

This is what we know:

The building fell down for a first time in history reason according to NIST.

So?

We know that there were demolition crews on site hours before the collapse. (Blanchard claim)

And you KNOW why, right?

We Know that it was reported collapsed by two different news agencies before it actually collapsed.

And you KMOW why, right?

We have Silverstein making the "pull" comment.

Oh crap. You have KNOWN for years already why the twoofer-interpretation of this pull-comment ist totally 100% ********, right? And you know all the resons, because they have been spoon-fed to you a zillion times over since at least 2006, right? Why do you continue to pull this ******** into discussions? Aren't you ashamed?

We have other WTC buildings that were "pulled" down. (With cables I believe.)

You know that this is done only to small structures that to not dwarf an excavator?

Now we have a report (from a debunker no less) that Silverstien was on the phone considering demolition with his insurance company.

So?

But it's all just a coincidence.

Hey, you forgot the photos of diagonally cut columns - if you are not ashamed to bring up all the aforementioned ********, you might add this one too.

But no, there is no meaningful coincidence. And you KNOW it.

 

[Oystein]

...
I don't know anyone who has seen the collapse of wtc7 and said 'that's OBVIOUSLY not a demolition'
Of all the things that's its obviously not, a demolition isn't one of them.
...

Most people here say just that. Because we use more sense and more senses. We do not just see, we also listen sometimes. What makes WTC7 so obviously not a CD is the total absence of this within a seconds of collapse initiation:

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!

heard by everybody in lower Manhattan and far beyond (I am talking about hundrefs of thousands of witnesses), and extremely clearly recorded, without exception, by every recording device within at least a mile

 

[Scott Sommers]

how do you know what I will think in the future?!

I don't know anyone who has seen the collapse of wtc7 and said 'that's OBVIOUSLY not a demolition'
Of all the things that's its obviously not, a demolition isn't one of them

That's the funny thing about all this. You look at all these people saying it's obvious and you ask who they are. It's not a very convincing bunch of folks. It's a bunch of anonymous folks on the Internet. It's high school students who belong to We Are Change. It's a bunch of - what was that word I read? - 'lawn engineers' who joined AE911. Is there even one person who's taken part in an actual building demolition?

Timmy, if it were just so obvious, there would be engineering textbooks that talk about the controlled demolition at the collapse of the WTC buildings. There would be professors who teach about it in their classes. There would be papers presented about this at professional conferences and meeting. Instead, there is nothing of the sort.

Unless you're going to start pulling out a New World Order that controls all the research scientists and professors in the world, this is a problem. You could solve it with an appeal to reptilian shape-shifting overlords. Is that where you want to go?

There is no reason to believe in a controlled demolition on 911. If there was, it would be more than a bunch of anonymous folks on 911 Truth sites.

 

[Dave Rogers]

I don't know anyone who has seen the collapse of wtc7 and said 'that's OBVIOUSLY not a demolition'

You're missing the point. The point is that a lot of people have listened to the collapse of WTC7 and said 'that's OBVIOUSLY not a demolition.

Dave

 

[Thunder]

This is what we know:

who were these NYPD officers and Con Ed workers, and how the **** did they know what Silverstein was talking about in a private convesation with his WTC insurers?

any day now Profanz. we're waiting.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

This is what we know:

The building fell down for a first time in history reason according to NIST.

any time a building falls down its the first time for THAT building. WTC7 was only one of many building destroyed that day.......why do you keep ignoring WTC 3,4,5 and 6?

We know that there were demolition crews on site hours before the collapse. (Blanchard claim)

When did a "claim" become a "know". I claim the the moon is made of green cheese.....does that mean it is and everyone should know that it is???

We Know that it was reported collapsed by two different news agencies before it actually collapsed.

So? you do know that they were informed that it would and that this was also broadcast to the world hours before it did. The fact that two agencies screwed uop on their reporting on that very confused day is hardly surprising. Are you saying the news always is accurate all the time???

We have Silverstein making the "pull" comment.

We have other WTC buildings that were "pulled" down. (With cables I believe.)

So? which of them was anywhere near the size of WTC7? and which of them on 911?

Now we have a report (from a debunker no less) that Silverstien was on the phone considering demolition with his insurance company.

I you have a building you own and the firemen are letting it burn.....what three outcomes are possible?......1. the fire goes out on its own and the building can be repaired.............do you agree that that is not very likely?
2. The building burns out but remains standing......possible and probably considered likely pre 911.....so what to do? Yep call up the your insurance and see what your policy says about you having to demolish your building.
3. The building collapses after burning for IIRC 7 hours

But it's all just a coincidence.

No its a silly CT.

But keep flogging.....Jammo seems to enjoy it and if you work hard you can be just as insane

 

[drainbread]

Even if Officer Random were to have pulled out his handy pocket recorder and caught this conversation it wouldn't mean a damned thing, nearly anything can be inferred by a one sided conversation.

 

[daws59]

thanks folks, logic wins!

 

[Bell]

Ding ding ding!!

Profanz, Timmyg!

How about this for an idea?

 

[timmyg]

you guys have completely lost the plot now.

Believe it or not, I can understand people not wanting to entertain the idea that 9/11 may have been carried out by parties other than mr bin ladens crew.

But saying that the collapse of wtc7 looked nothing like a controlled demolition. And saying that anyone who does find a similarity must be emotionally unstable......!

wow.

just wow.

I wish I was a politician or a scientist for NIST, so I could tell you all an elephant is an orange, and watch you believe it.

 

[carlitos]

Credulous truther is credulous.

ETA - just curious - Did the collapse of WTC7 also sound like a CD?

hint:

 

[timmyg]

Timmy, if it were just so obvious, there would be engineering textbooks that talk about the controlled demolition at the collapse of the WTC buildings. There would be professors who teach about it in their classes. There would be papers presented about this at professional conferences and meeting. Instead, there is nothing of the sort.

everytime i discuss/debate/have a slanging match with you guys I work out a bit more about your mental disposition.
You aren't aware of the concept of self-censorship are you?

and the fact people like to have jobs.