• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New brilliant theory, free for truther consumption

TK0001

Muse
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
593
Alright, hear me out:

Some truthers claim the DNA evidence of the victims of flight 77 is genuine, but since it had to be shipped to an off-site location, and there wasn't a camera following the evidence from the Pentagon to the lab, it really could have come from anywhere. At the same time, they believe the Shanksville site could have involved a plane, but that plane sure as hell wasn't flight 93.

I think you're picking up what I'm laying down, but I'll go ahead and spell it out:

The only possible conclusion is flight 77 crashed in Shanksville and flight 93 crashed into the Pentagon, and the government spent billions of dollars from their black budget to make it look like the opposite happened.

I'll just assume your minds are sufficiently blown at this point. It all makes perfect sense. After donning the tinfoil truther Truth Enhancement Cranial Device, that is.
 
Now we know why they refused to collect serial numbers! its all clear now.

But wait didn't the plane fly OVER the pentagon? I'm sure P4T absolutely proved that somewhere....:D
 
Now we know why they refused to collect serial numbers! its all clear now.

But wait didn't the plane fly OVER the pentagon? I'm sure P4T absolutely proved that somewhere....:D

The first flight flew over the Pentagon just after dropping the fake American Airlines "wreckage" all over the lawn.
 
Have a friend who was involved with one, or the other's two's DNA comparisons. I like her. I've respected her for decades. I am convinced that her results were fully-in-keeping with other claims.

Sorry, they do not connect with those of random hockey players or curlers. They can call for later calls for drinks, but it ain't our call.
 
Alright, hear me out:

Some truthers claim the DNA evidence of the victims of flight 77 is genuine, but since it had to be shipped to an off-site location, and there wasn't a camera following the evidence from the Pentagon to the lab, it really could have come from anywhere. At the same time, they believe the Shanksville site could have involved a plane, but that plane sure as hell wasn't flight 93.

I think you're picking up what I'm laying down, but I'll go ahead and spell it out:

The only possible conclusion is flight 77 crashed in Shanksville and flight 93 crashed into the Pentagon, and the government spent billions of dollars from their black budget to make it look like the opposite happened.

I'll just assume your minds are sufficiently blown at this point. It all makes perfect sense. After donning the tinfoil truther Truth Enhancement Cranial Device, that is.

There is a simple solution:

Prove your point of view.

As far as I know, there is neither an evidence that these guys boarded AA77 and UA93, nor forensic evidence that they died in these planes. A lot of "John Doe" forensic claims, though.

If that`s too difficult, just provide serial numbers of parts of the related Boeings.
That ain`t rocket science Dude. Daily routine for an average attorney.


Regards,
Kesha
 
Last edited:
There is a simple solution:

Prove your point of view.

As far as I know, there is neither an evidence that these guys boarded AA77 and UA93, nor forensic evidence that they died in these planes. A lot of "John Doe" forensic claims, though.

If that`s too difficult, just provide serial numbers of the related Boeings.
That ain`t rocket science Dude. Daily routine for an average attorney.


Regards,
Kesha

Here is a simple question:

What DID happen and can you proof that?


Regards,
Bell
 
Here is a simple question:

What DID happen and can you proof that?


Regards,
Bell

I don`t need to prove anything. The official story is what we are talking about. See my posting above. I won`t provide any alternative scenario, why should I ?


Regards,
Kesha
 
As far as I know, there is neither an evidence that these guys boarded AA77 and UA93, nor forensic evidence that they died in these planes. A lot of "John Doe" forensic claims, though.

If that`s too difficult, just provide serial numbers of the related Boeings.

Sorry, the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United States of America and the United States Army are not "John Doe". Ironically, the only "John Doe's" here are the small group of internet truthers who occasionally pop out of there holes to regurgitate the same disproven claptrap and let out a squeal of "new investigation".

As to the numbers - why bother, there is absolutley no indication that anyone in the troofer movement is poised or ready to accept proof about anything except that which will constantly reinforce their conspiracy fanatsies.
 
I don`t need to prove anything. The official story is what we are talking about. See my posting above. I won`t provide any alternative scenario, why should I ?


Regards,
Kesha

Okay fine, then don't provide any alternative scenario, what else is new?

So you want to talk about the official story? Where's your PROOF that the official story is not true? Yes, you need to prove it is not true.


Regards,
Bell
 
Sorry, the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United States of America and the United States Army are not "John Doe". Ironically, the only "John Doe's" here are the small group of internet truthers who occasionally pop out of there holes to regurgitate the same disproven claptrap and let out a squeal of "new investigation".

As to the numbers - why bother, there is absolutley no indication that anyone in the troofer movement is poised or ready to accept proof about anything except that which will constantly reinforce their conspiracy fanatsies.

I am not in the "Truther Movement". I am an engineer. If you are driving a BMW or an AUDI, you`ll probably drive one of my products,

OK, back to topic.
As far as I know, none of the 19 individuals have been identified. The forensic evidence identified the remains as "John Doe".

Is this right or wrong?
 
Last edited:
I am not in the "Truther Movement". I am an engineer. If you are driving a BMW or an AUDI, you`ll probably drive one of my products,

OK, back to topic.
As far as I know, none of the 19 individuals have been identified. The forensic evidence identified the remains as "John Doe".

Is this right or wrong?


If true, what would the significance be?
 
I don`t need to prove anything. The official story is what we are talking about. See my posting above. I won`t provide any alternative scenario, why should I ?


Regards,
Kesha
You are right the official story is based on evidence and the dolts in 911 truth have failed for 8 years.
19 terrorists boarded four planes - evidence is solid and there is not a thing 911 truth can do to change history by claiming complete ignorance of evidence and failing to stand behind their idiotic claims and insane conclusions 911 truth can't state.

77 impacted the Pentagon, it is proved by evidence as is Flight 93 impacting in PA. Evidence ignored by 911 truth so they can have failed moronic delusions; 911 truth does not have to prove they have moronic delusions, 911 truth has no idea they have delusions due to lack of knowledge and willful ignorance of evidence.

It takes a great deal of ignorance to not figure out 911. Flight 93 Passengers set the standard. After 8 years 911 truth has failed to do what Flight 93 Passengers did in minutes.
 
You are right the official story is based on evidence and the dolts in 911 truth have failed for 8 years.
19 terrorists boarded four planes - evidence is solid

Cheers!

Please provide the original Passenger Manifest for each flight.

When this Airbus crashed in Africa today, this matter was solved within 2 hours.
 
I am not in the "Truther Movement". I am an engineer. If you are driving a BMW or an AUDI, you`ll probably drive one of my products,

OK, back to topic.
As far as I know, none of the 19 individuals have been identified. The forensic evidence identified the remains as "John Doe".

Is this right or wrong?

Appeal to authority noted.

So, there were persons on board the planes, besides the crew and regular passengers, that could not be identified? Jeez, wonder who they were?
 

Back
Top Bottom