• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Amanda Knox guilty - all because of a cartwheel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oops, my mistake...birds of a feather and all that...I confused the name, but my post was aimed at you.

Like I said, it looks like a hickey to me. I'm not going to argue day and night about it, but the evidence that it's a "wound" is pretty scant you gotta admit.
 
Did you just call me Matthew, or is this some inside baseball I'm not privy to?

Is Michael using real names now? Peggy and himself are very frustrated. They are seeing their little cult following slip away. It was the only time in their lives that they felt like they had any power. They felt important for a while but it's all slipping away now.
 
Like I said: I agree that I want to see the cancelled cheques.



The PR campaign is not dangerous to the trial. If that were true then it would be hard to imagine anyone being convicted of anything anywhere. Just hire David Marriott and you can walk free.

On the other hand, the existence and virulence of the campaign and its secretive connections are something that ought to concern anyone. It really is up to those contracting them to open their arrangements to public scrutiny. And for FOA it's even easier: Open the books and publish the financial documentation.

What do you mean when you say FOA? As far as I'm aware, this is Friends of Amanda Knox, which has a website and a small membership. I haven't seen evidence that FOA is paying anyone at all actually. Charlie Wilkes could probably answer that question.
 
I doubt they would say it is "fine" but it is within the rules. We already have at least one forum racist. Look up some posts by "MaGZ".

I encourage people to say what they think, no matter how revolting. It helps me understand the world better than does plugging my ears.



Pfftt...we have whole threads devoted to that topic.



It is. We prove it by allowing everyone to speak their mind. Your fear of words frightens me almost as much as the racism you hope to ignore.

I am not as afraid of words as the person who wants **** instead of a swear word!!!

So why is saying I am afraid of words not an 'insult against the person and not the argument?'. I simply asked a question? Are some insults more 'ok' than others, depending on who makes them maybe??? :)

The moderators removed all my posts but leave hers. She insults others, it is ok. I insult her and it is not ok. Fine. I begin to see how it works over here. So be it.

I was using the holocaust denial as an example. In my country it is illegal to deny the holocaust, and I think you are making a good point in saying the arguments should be heard and torn down. I don't disagree with you, but I find it personally deeply offensive. but maybe Europe has a very different history to you people in the United States and it makes us more sensitive to genocide and mass murder. It is something you have thankfully not had to suffer.

I think it is funny Jref are scared of swear words!!! What is wrong with a little profanity? What is to be scared of??!!!! :)
 
What do you mean when you say FOA? As far as I'm aware, this is Friends of Amanda Knox, which has a website and a small membership. I haven't seen evidence that FOA is paying anyone at all actually. Charlie Wilkes could probably answer that question.

No one is being paid for any online effort. Everything you see online is a volunteer effort.
 
Could we cool it on the personal attacks? There certainly are a few things that can be said if we want to look at the PR campaign, but can we do it without all this petty crap?
 
I doubt they would say it is "fine" but it is within the rules. We already have at least one forum racist. Look up some posts by "MaGZ".

I encourage people to say what they think, no matter how revolting. It helps me understand the world better than does plugging my ears.



Pfftt...we have whole threads devoted to that topic.



It is. We prove it by allowing everyone to speak their mind. Your fear of words frightens me almost as much as the racism you hope to ignore.

Hi KingMerv00. Well, approving of that kind of thing...that sort of open debate, so you can take it head on? You have my respect, that tales courage. Often, these thorny subjects are swept under the carpet and can fester and it all goes underground (out of sight, out of mind). I agree with the idea of taking it head on. I'm just not so hopeful for a happy ending.
 
Last edited:
I think someone in this thread even said that "FOA" paid Frank Sfarzo to run a freaking blogspot blog.

Interestingly, some of Frank's own admissions of closeness to the Knox/Mellas family have been mysteriously deleted from his own blog:

Comment deleted This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
July 12, 2009 11:42 AM

The comment that was deleted was this:

Sfarzo wrote:
frank said...
Actually I was looking out for them but i realized they don't like to receive advice, so I didn't give them. I told only the photographer, who is a friend of mine, not to take pictures there. I told him a hundred times, but he wouldn't listen...

July 12, 2009 11:42 AM

This was regarding the episode where the cottage was used as a backdrop for posed pictures of two of Amanda's relatives. If I look hard enough I might even be able to find out how Frank came to reappear in Perugia to seize the reins. He was not there during the murder but only arrived later. If you're interested I'll locate it.
 
shuttIt said:
Could we cool it on the personal attacks? There certainly are a few things that can be said if we want to look at the PR campaign, but can we do it without all this petty crap?
Seconded, shuttit. It's coming from both sides and doesn't do any good to either.

CoulsdonUK, welcome to the JREF forum. I think you are correct, but can't seem to find a cite just now. Perhaps someone with more familiarity with the mobile phone evidence can step in and help you?
 
Last edited:
What would you like me to define? Many individuals have stood up because they saw an injustice. The sites listed below are all individual efforts.

You try to put them all together and scream FOA!


http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/

http://knoxarchives.blogspot.com/

http://www.sciencespheres.com/

http://viewfromwilmington.blogspot.com/

Those aren't interest groups. It's you, someone I haven't encountered, a professor of vertical gardening, and Chris Halkides. To your credit (I believe) none of you are raising money.
 
Could we cool it on the personal attacks? There certainly are a few things that can be said if we want to look at the PR campaign, but can we do it without all this petty crap?

Fulcanelli writes: "it's okay Mathew, Amanda's still alive and you can still imagine her late in the evenings while you're lying in bed ...your box of cleanex is still on your bedside table...wink, wink."

This is the guy that runs PMF! Absolutely no credibility. None!
 
Hello this is my first post on JREF so please do forgive any lack of protocol. I received some second hand information and was wondering whether someone could confirm its accuracy or not. Is it true that mobile communications have proven that Amanda was not in Raffaele apartment when she received and responded to Patrick Lumumba’s text? It’s just that I recall Miss Knox and Mr Sollecito’s stated that they stayed in the night of the murder.

Welcome CoulsdonUK. Yes, that's true.
 
What do you mean when you say FOA? As far as I'm aware, this is Friends of Amanda Knox, which has a website and a small membership. I haven't seen evidence that FOA is paying anyone at all actually. Charlie Wilkes could probably answer that question.

Only one way to find out. Publish the financials.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom