• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Noah's Ark found?


seems the most likely explanation (if not this exact story, then just fraud in general). Archaeology fraud happens all the time, including Biblical archaeology. Which isn't to say it's always the Biblical archaeologists/historians committed the fraud. Many times they really do believe in the sincerity of their discoveries, but are duped by hucksters.
 
According to one of the men involved, this is all faked. Randall Price, who has a history of looking for the Ark, explains:

I was the archaeologist with the Chinese expedition in the summer of 2008 and was given photos of what they now are reporting to be the inside of the Ark. I and my partners invested $100,000 in this expedition (described below) which they have retained, despite their promise and our requests to return it, since it was not used for the expedition. The information given below is my opinion based on what I have seen and heard (from others who claim to have been eyewitnesses or know the exact details).

To make a long story short: this is all reported to be a fake. The photos were reputed to have been taken off site near the Black Sea, but the film footage the Chinese now have was shot on location on Mt. Ararat. In the late summer of 2008 ten Kurdish workers hired by Parasut, the guide used by the Chinese, are said to have planted large wood beams taken from an old structure in the Black Sea area (where the photos were originally taken) at the Mt. Ararat site. In the winter of 2008 a Chinese climber taken by Parasut’s men to the site saw the wood, but couldn’t get inside because of the severe weather conditions. During the summer of 2009 more wood was planted inside a cave at the site.

... our Kurdish partner in Dogubabyazit (the village at the foot of Mt. Ararat) has all of the facts about the location, the men who planted the wood, and even the truck that transported it.

Full Source
 
seems the most likely explanation (if not this exact story, then just fraud in general). Archaeology fraud happens all the time, including Biblical archaeology. Which isn't to say it's always the Biblical archaeologists/historians committed the fraud. Many times they really do believe in the sincerity of their discoveries, but are duped by hucksters.

Example please ?
 
Because I'm a class action lawyer for L.D. Babylonian Scribes incorporated.
theres a slight copyright issue we'd like to discuss (in open court) with anyone who's publically stating that the Bible is the inerrant word of God. Anyone saying that from this point on is going to get sued (and possibly sacrificed to Bel)
:cool:
No I'm not kidding
:p


Youre treading very close to the litigation line there sonny
:D

p.s. I have my eye on you RadRook
[qimg]http://psd.museum.upenn.edu/epsd/psl/img/popup/Ofbm.png[/qimg]
http://psd.museum.upenn.edu/epsd/epsd/e2510.html
:degrin:

According to their story the Noah's Ark organization got the story straight from god so any legal issues will have to be litigated in the Celestial Court.
 

I saw this in one of the quotes cited:

As a result, Noah's life was an example to his entire generation. Although everyone around him followed the evil in their hearts


Either the first sentence is false or Noah was a real bad example.
 
What shape is an ark? Is it just a box, like the ark of the covenant?

I get a picture in my head of what would be a perfect Gary Larson cartoon.

Noah as a kid, looking furtively out of the corner of his eyes, hunched over a box labelled "Noah's Ark", filled with his animal porn collection.
 
Last edited:
Even if it the ark is out there, will it be on this particular mountain?

Afterall, Genesis says that the ark came to rest "in the mountains of Ararat." This particular mountain, renamed to Ararat to better fit the bill, was identified as the place by this or that person thousands of years ago, who was making it up to fill in gaps in the source material -- which is how all theology works, by the way -- and credulous "researchers" today just assume that this tradition reflects reality.
 
Study of ark dimentions in relation to seaworthiness

In conclusion, the Ark as a drifting ship, is thus believed to have had a reasonable-beam-draft ratio for the safety of the hull, crew and cargo in the high winds and waves imposed on it by the Genesis Flood.

The voyage limit of the Ark, estimated from modern passenger ships’ criteria reveals that it could have navigated sea conditions with waves higher than 30 metres

http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v8/i1/noah.asp.


Anyone have a different result from a similar or identical test?

Another detailed study about the Ark's seaworthiness
http://www.biblicalcreation.org.uk/biblical_studies/bcs043.html
 
Last edited:
According to their story the Noah's Ark organization got the story straight from god so any legal issues will have to be litigated in the Celestial Court.

Not if I'm only pursuing anti-Babylonian slander, there is only one true God,
Bel Marduk

any claims to the contrary are therefore slanderous.

:p
 
Little is known about the shape and form of the Ark’s hull. However, several explorers have each claimed that they have discovered the remains of the Ark at some sites on Mt. Ararat.8 Based on their arguments and references,9 we estimated the form of the Ark’s hull as that of a barge-type ship.

Anyone have a different result from a similar or identical test?

facepalm.jpg

:D:D
 
Not if I'm only pursuing anti-Babylonian slander, there is only one true God,
Bel Marduk

any claims to the contrary are therefore slanderous.

:p

That's irrelevant to the test results. Actually, I get the impression you aren't really interested in test results but simply in heckling and jeclkling for self amusement purposes. That's OK by me. But when I ask a serious question I reeally don't apreciate a heckling jeckling response. It's timewasting. Not that you aren't entitled to clowning around. Simply that I try to minmize that kind of stuff on my screen to reduce clutter and save time. In short, I prefer to discuss the matter with those who aren't here to simply slurge contempt as a self-induced catharsis at every opportunity.
 
Last edited:

No, specifically as you claimed that "some Biblical Archaeologists had been taken by Hucksters", I knew of two previous examples recently, that of the ivory pomegranate and that of the James Ossuary,
I was wondering if there was a market for things that Jesus (might possibly have) made back in his carpentry shop. Test tube holders, Spice racks, Wooden toy trucks, hammer handles etc etc

So I just wondered if you knew of any more examples than that, which, advise on how to find the right bible thumping market, in order, to make bundles of cash from some rich religious retards who don't know any better

I wasn't at all questioning the veracity of your post
:p.
 
That's irrelevant test rtesults. I get the impression you aren't really interested in test results but simply in heckling and jeclkling for self amusement purposes.

I'm terribly sorry that you have been lied to.
I would seriously think of suing your church if I were you.
I have plenty of "victim support links if you need them"
otherwise
I will prey on you
:p
 

Back
Top Bottom