I can't make out the end of the knife with certainty. It looks to me as if it's got a blunt end, though I might be wrong. I assume forensics can tell the difference between a wound inflicted be a coursely serrated knife like a breadknife and, say a flick knife, but I could be wrong.
Why is this important? They showed up at the police station not because they were walking by and decided to stop in and say "hello".Shame that Amanda Knox said she went of her own volition, in court. You have been told this before and the testimony has been linked. Why do you persist with this ?
But once again, wearily: from her court appearance
Did Dr. Giobbi call them in?
The cops wanted further data from them and so they went by (what other explanation do you have for their trip to questura?) The cops did not haul them in a jail van (although they left the next day in one) if that's what you want to suggest.
Amanda felt confident enough at the time to do cartwheels (requested, according to Chris Mellas by a visiting cop from another town ... ) and homework.
She calls that voluntary. Okay.
Why is this important? They showed up at the police station not because they were walking by and decided to stop in and say "hello".
The cops had asked them to come by and they did (what other explanation do you have for their trip to questura? The cops did not haul them in a jail van (although they left the next day in one).
Amanda felt confident enough at the time to do cartwheels (requested, according to Chris Mellas by a visiting cop from another town ... ) and homework.
She calls that voluntary. Okay.
I do not agree, Kermit. She has said quite clearly, and more than once, in court, that she was not asked to go to the questura that day: RS was asked to go and she went with him. Since it would actually be in keeping with her story of duress and coercion it would actually fit better if she had been called in: but she did not say that
Do you believe that Raffaele had only one kitchen knife that was not serrated?
Did Dr. Giobbi call them in?
.I do not agree, Kermit. She has said quite clearly, and more than once, in court, that she was not asked to go to the questura that day: RS was asked to go and she went with him. Since it would actually be in keeping with her story of duress and coercion it would actually fit better if she had been called in: but she did not say that
.Where are you heading with this? Is this another goalpost moving project or is there a relevant point you are trying to make?
Did they lie or were they wrong in their analysis?
This is important because:
To actually "lie" they would have to know the person in the CCTV wasn't Amanda.
If they really thought it was Amanda and therefore confronted here with that, they were wrong, not lying.
And for the police correcting the possibly misleading impression by the press: I asked you to consider it before, is that their job or is it the job of the press to get the story straight?
.Who is responsible for the misinformation about the bleach receipt?
Did Dr. Giobbi lie about this?
I feel like they're launching clay pigeons, waiting, just waiting for us to miss one, so they can claim victory.
I can't make out the end of the knife with certainty. It looks to me as if it's got a blunt end, though I might be wrong. I assume forensics can tell the difference between a wound inflicted be a coursely serrated knife like a breadknife and, say a flick knife, but I could be wrong.
The serrations:shuttIt,
I cannot see any serrations or see what looks like a blunt end. How certain are you of either of these things?


shuttIt,
I cannot see any serrations or see what looks like a blunt end. How certain are you of either of these things?
The serrations:
Are you serious? I mean. Honestly. You're seriously claiming you cannot see the serrations of the bread knife?