WTC1,2 and 7 Were CD's?

[Carll68]

Hello,

I would like to encourage anyone holding the view/opinion/belief that that attacks of September 11th 2001 on WTC1, WTC 2, and the pentagon where a covert operation/inside job by the Bush admin/Mossad/C.I.A/ N.W.O/I.R.A/K.A.O.S/C.O.N.T.R.O.L to rationalize the following - succinctly and directly as possible:

If indeed you feel that the towers were destroyed as a result of a C.D orchestrated by "Higher ups" and in fact "blamed" on the terrorists as a part of a master plan, whether L.I.H.O.P. or M.I.H.O.P, then why were the explosives that you claim felled the towers not simply written into this elaborate "long in planning" exersize to be blamed on the terrorists?

I look forward to rationale and direct replies

 

[Jackanory]

Hello,

I would like to encourage anyone holding the view/opinion/belief that that attacks of September 11th 2001 on WTC1, WTC 2, and the pentagon where a covert operation/inside job by the Bush admin/Mossad/C.I.A/ N.W.O/I.R.A/K.A.O.S/C.O.N.T.R.O.L to rationalize the following - succinctly and directly as possible:

If indeed you feel that the towers were destroyed as a result of a C.D orchestrated by "Higher ups" and in fact "blamed" on the terrorists as a part of a master plan, whether L.I.H.O.P. or M.I.H.O.P, then why were the explosives that you claim felled the towers not simply written into this elaborate "long in planning" exersize to be blamed on the terrorists?

I look forward to rationale and direct replies

Thats easy. The truthers would be asking us to prove how the terrorists got those explosives past security, how the terrorists managed to hide those explosives etc etc etc

 

[DC]

Thats easy. The truthers would be asking us to prove how the terrorists got those explosives past security, how the terrorists managed to hide those explosives etc etc etc

lol, briliant answer

 

[ozeco41]

lol, briliant answer

Agreed.

Standard Operating Procedure for truthers is:
1) Shift the burden of proof to the opposing non-truther; AND
2) Require said non-truther to prove a negative; WHICH
3) Is merely representative of a potentially non-ending list of shifted goalposts.

 

[T.A.M.]

Truthbot subroutine:

10 Ask Question
20 Receive Undesired Answer
30 Shift Burden of Truth
40 Require provision of evidence for a negative
50 Shift Goal Posts
60 Go To 10

TAM

 

[DC]

Agreed.

Standard Operating Procedure for truthers is:
1) Shift the burden of proof to the opposing non-truther; AND
2) Require said non-truther to prove a negative; WHICH
3) Is merely representative of a potentially non-ending list of shifted goalposts.

if that fails, you always can use the truther joker,


SHILL!!!!!!


(laughing about truthers still feels strange to me, and hypocritical, lol)

 

[funk de fino]

if that fails, you always can use the truther joker,


SHILL!!!!!!


(laughing about truthers still feels strange to me, and hypocritical, lol)

I am proud of you

 

[DC]

I am proud of you

we would come along together, we just must prevent mentioning Venezuela