Former Rooski Nucular Intelligence Officer To Blow the Reveal Entire 911 Plot
- Thread starter Foolmewunz
- Start date
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
Folks, remember: The seismic reading was taken at theLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., which was on the order of 20 miles away. The witness in question was what, right there? That would account for the difference, I would say.
ETA: We've had discussions on the seismic readings before:
Now, those discussions don't necessarily address what this truther is getting at, but it does provide background in understanding the seismograph readings.
Last edited:
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
Thank you, 911thology, for your brief and entertaining return.
I'd have to say that not since The Adventure of MaGZ and The Pigeon have I had such an entertaining read.
No science, no facts, no nuttin'.
(Did anyone actually make it through to any of the 26 parts that explained just what Boris Badanov had in mind? Are the Russians now part of the NWO, or is there some new sinister group out there a la Dr. Evil?)
I'd have to say that not since The Adventure of MaGZ and The Pigeon have I had such an entertaining read.
No science, no facts, no nuttin'.
(Did anyone actually make it through to any of the 26 parts that explained just what Boris Badanov had in mind? Are the Russians now part of the NWO, or is there some new sinister group out there a la Dr. Evil?)
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
Damn it, Lau Joe, why did you do that to me? Now I'm going to go through the night with the phrase "Keel Moose" going through my head.
Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
[qimg]http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n94/elmondohummus/lol.gif[/qimg]
Damn it, Lau Joe, why did you do that to me? Now I'm going to go through the night with the phrase "Keel Moose" going through my head.
Well, I just got this packet of info from the, uhh, Information Officer, Yeah, that's it the Information Officer at the American Embassy in Bangkok. It seems they have some of the planning on tape....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHUiCYAE2DY
The actual early planning stages.
When you say "this truther," are you refering to 911thology or me?
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
I'm referring to 911thology, of course. You're no truther. What I'm saying is that the links to previous discussions don't directly address the claims 911thology made in his 26 volume
video "series", but they do provide enough background on the seismograph readings to be able to understand what they meant.tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
So then two "half-truths" equals one "truth"?
I'm referring to 911thology, of course. You're no truther. What I'm saying is that the links to previous discussions don't directly address the claims 911thology made in his 26 volume
Sorry for the confusion. I thought you were talking about me because my question sounded a little truther-ish.
I hate the fact that he left so soon, but I took him up on his odder and I watched the series, I politely responded to him with some questions, regarding survivors in the aftermath, collapse initiating at the point of impact, how could the "bathtub" survive the blast, etc...here is what I got back
@djlunacee - you better watch the entire movie and leave your final comments after the part 11 (or preferably even after the part 26). Otherwise you do not look too clever with your 'clever' statements.
I mentioned the fact that he got blasted over here and ran like a coward, I will keep you posted if he ever replies back with something other than watch all 26 parts of my video.
@djlunacee - you better watch the entire movie and leave your final comments after the part 11 (or preferably even after the part 26). Otherwise you do not look too clever with your 'clever' statements.
I mentioned the fact that he got blasted over here and ran like a coward, I will keep you posted if he ever replies back with something other than watch all 26 parts of my video.
Sabrina
Wicked Lovely
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2007
- Messages
- 9,810
Wait, so you watched all 26 parts, asked him some questions, and his response was to watch his video?
Anyone else getting dizzy with the circular reasoning here?
doobiedoright
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2008
- Messages
- 396
Wow that is so wrong!
if you cant get that little info right ,your not worth wasting any time on!
Distance has a lot to do with it. I once clearly felt a 1.0. Its "epicenter" turned out to be almost directly beneath where I was standing, and at shallow depth.
Since the seismic event in question was caused by the collapse of large structures, a better question would be whether the individuals could reasonably have felt those structures collapsing from where they were standing. The answer is, quite obviously, yes.
JoeyDonuts
Frequencies Not Known To Normals
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,536
Didn't this guy say earlier that he arrived at his conclusion by speaking to "several intelligence officials", including those of the United States?
I wonder if ULTIMA1 is his source.
I wonder if ULTIMA1 is his source.
Yes ma'am watched all 26 wretched parts, repeated the same questions that were raised in this thread and then told him basically he had unfinished business over here, and this was his reply:
@djlunacee - I never 'run' from 'jref'. I set my conditions for formulating questions stating that only questions by those who watched the movie providing these questions reveal genuine interest will be answered, while questions showing only malice, but no genuine interest will be ignored. My conditions were not met. People who did not watch my movie begun to ask questions, moreover not even a single question showed interest, but only malice. I quit based on non-compliance with my conditions.
So there you have it...He was asked direct questions regarding survivors on the rubble after a nuclear blast that "dustified" steel, dodged my question regarding how the bathtub was able to stand up to the blast, and how in the world the island of Manhattan is still standing after incurring three 150 kiloton nuclear blasts, and how he can explain his own discrepancy of claiming these nukes were built in, by the designers in the OP and then later in the thread stating they were delivered by train.
@djlunacee - I never 'run' from 'jref'. I set my conditions for formulating questions stating that only questions by those who watched the movie providing these questions reveal genuine interest will be answered, while questions showing only malice, but no genuine interest will be ignored. My conditions were not met. People who did not watch my movie begun to ask questions, moreover not even a single question showed interest, but only malice. I quit based on non-compliance with my conditions.
So there you have it...He was asked direct questions regarding survivors on the rubble after a nuclear blast that "dustified" steel, dodged my question regarding how the bathtub was able to stand up to the blast, and how in the world the island of Manhattan is still standing after incurring three 150 kiloton nuclear blasts, and how he can explain his own discrepancy of claiming these nukes were built in, by the designers in the OP and then later in the thread stating they were delivered by train.
in another message here is what he wrote if you care to pick it apart:
@djlunacee - I don't see anything wrong with survivors. Some of them were on stair-cases that were within surviving corners of the lowest Towers' perimeters that were not pulverized (why it so happened - see parts 15-16). As long as this part of building survived some people survived in there too. This fact has nothing to do with the actual caliber (150 kiloton) of the nuke, because it was underground nuclear explosion, not atmospheric, and its caliber does not matter in this sense
and
@djlunacee In my opinion nukes were very precise as you can see from destruction zones of the nuke behind the WTC-7 which was so precise that it spared Verizon and US Post Office buildings being dangerously close to the WTC-7 (see parts 15-16). If nukes were so precise and their positions were well-calculated it explains also that bathtub wall was not destroyed (though it was surely weakened enough to cause serious concerns)
@djlunacee - I don't see anything wrong with survivors. Some of them were on stair-cases that were within surviving corners of the lowest Towers' perimeters that were not pulverized (why it so happened - see parts 15-16). As long as this part of building survived some people survived in there too. This fact has nothing to do with the actual caliber (150 kiloton) of the nuke, because it was underground nuclear explosion, not atmospheric, and its caliber does not matter in this sense
and
@djlunacee In my opinion nukes were very precise as you can see from destruction zones of the nuke behind the WTC-7 which was so precise that it spared Verizon and US Post Office buildings being dangerously close to the WTC-7 (see parts 15-16). If nukes were so precise and their positions were well-calculated it explains also that bathtub wall was not destroyed (though it was surely weakened enough to cause serious concerns)
sheeplesnshills
Illuminator
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2010
- Messages
- 3,706
I agree, I think this guy is just another opportunist trying to make money out of the stupidity or mental illness of the truthers. We have seen from the likes of Jammonius that they will believe the most ridiculous things so he can write anything and the fools will lap it up.
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
Precision nuke? Is that anything like a supersonic turtle? Hard cotton? Soft concrete?You know, I have no idea if the guy's a charlatan who knows he's full of it or a guy who's genuinely delusional. From his dodges both here and at YouTube, my guess is the former since he's so very unwilling to elaborate on his "knowledge" (the exact opposite behavior of someone who genuinely wants to inform the public). But I admit, I don't actually know for sure. Anyway, the notion that the WTC disaster site resembled an underground nuke detonation is ludicrous; there are plenty of videos of underground explosions on the 'net, and the WTC event resembles none of them. Here's one example:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1870730456324813920#
Can't argue that the video is showing bigger nukes either; the US is limited to 150kt nuke tests by treaty.So that would be the magnitude of nuke that 911thology would be talking about. Anyone see any similarities in the blast itself vs. the towers collapse? Let alone in the aftermath? Nope, neither do I.
There are a ton more ways to refute this silly conceit, but we're beating a dead horse. This guy's just as full of it as most other truthers; he's just full in a minority direction. He and Bill Deagle can keep each other company; they're welcome to each other.