lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2007
- Messages
- 13,208
Well, the problem with that is that almost anything that the government does sounds good if you're vague enough about what it's doing and how much it's spending. Who can argue with "economic development," especially in the middle of a recession.
Of course, if it turns out that what "economic development" really means is paying for some lunatic in Wyoming to grow rice and bananas on the taxpayer's dollar, most people will change their minds.
While this does occur it seem anecdotal rather then systemic. remember McCain was going to eliminate earmarks and save a grand total of $18 billion? Essentially a paltry amount given the size of the the US budget, and it's still far from conclusive that something is wasteful just because it's an earmark.
In other cases it only sounds silly in partisan soundbytes. "Volcano monitoring? what a wast of money why do we need that"