• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

What should the government pay for?

What should the government uses taxes to pay for?

  • Military

    Votes: 74 91.4%
  • Homeland Security and National Guard

    Votes: 69 85.2%
  • Roads and other transportation

    Votes: 76 93.8%
  • Schools

    Votes: 75 92.6%
  • Utility projects (power, water, sewer etc.)

    Votes: 65 80.2%
  • Social Security

    Votes: 63 77.8%
  • Medicare

    Votes: 61 75.3%
  • Welfare

    Votes: 59 72.8%
  • Unemployment

    Votes: 60 74.1%
  • Health Care

    Votes: 63 77.8%
  • Student Loans

    Votes: 51 63.0%
  • National Parks

    Votes: 72 88.9%
  • Arts

    Votes: 43 53.1%
  • Support of major industries in trouble (bailouts)

    Votes: 25 30.9%
  • Farm and industrial subsidies

    Votes: 27 33.3%
  • Disaster assistance

    Votes: 71 87.7%
  • Space program and other non-medical science

    Votes: 70 86.4%
  • Medical research

    Votes: 60 74.1%
  • Aid to other countries

    Votes: 55 67.9%
  • Citizen protection (OOSA, FAA, EPA, etc.)

    Votes: 70 86.4%

  • Total voters
    81
Well, the problem with that is that almost anything that the government does sounds good if you're vague enough about what it's doing and how much it's spending. Who can argue with "economic development," especially in the middle of a recession.

Of course, if it turns out that what "economic development" really means is paying for some lunatic in Wyoming to grow rice and bananas on the taxpayer's dollar, most people will change their minds.

While this does occur it seem anecdotal rather then systemic. remember McCain was going to eliminate earmarks and save a grand total of $18 billion? Essentially a paltry amount given the size of the the US budget, and it's still far from conclusive that something is wasteful just because it's an earmark.

In other cases it only sounds silly in partisan soundbytes. "Volcano monitoring? what a wast of money why do we need that"
 
This was close to my reaction. I think the question would be better phrased something like, "What services should we as a nation provide?"

...snip...

I think that is the best way to put it (I'd usually put it more as "What services should the society that I choose to belong to provide?"). It may well be that for the provision of some services the most effective (which does not always mean the most cost effective) way is to have a national body (i.e. government) directly provide that service. For other things it may be for the society via a national body to pay "private" enterprise to provide the service. It should be on a case by case basis.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom