Former Rooski Nucular Intelligence Officer To Blow the Reveal Entire 911 Plot

Foolmewunz

Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
Foolmewunz
Joined
Aug 11, 2006
Messages
41,468
Location
Pattaya, Thailand
(Some tagger may want to change the tags before I get another write up.)

Normally I don't share my toys real well, but you guys deserve a new treat now and then.

How's this? Fresh meat, guys, and it isn't from a lunatic conspiracy site site. Let's all give a resounding welcome to the uh, .... interesting.... yeah, interesting ideas of 911thology. He says he'll be happy to elaborate, so here's your chance to get all the answers you've been so sorely missing.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5769849#post5769849

Hi to everyone. I found this Forum because of my search for a place where ideas about the 9/11 could be exchanged. I registered here sometime ago, but was an 'inactive' member ever since. This one is my first post. About myself - I am a serious 9/11 researcher because of 2 different reasons. Firstly, I am a former commissioned officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence, so I understand quite well about nuclear explosions, their properties, effects, and I know very well about their actual relevance to the WTC -1, -2, and -7 demolitions. Secondly, because I was somehow acquainted with certain real 9/11 planners, which even resulted in the American FBI's attempt to arrest me and to obtain my extradition to the United States in 2003. Recently I have published my video documentary on YouTube where I explained a lot of details about the WTC Twins and the WTC-7 so far unexplainable pulverizations and about many other aspects of the 9/11, the Pentagon's missile name, the Doomsday plane's mystery and the Sears Tower's evacuation inclusive. So far most of visitors found this extremely interesting. Anyone is welcome to watch the documentary and to ask me questions, if any. I will be pleased to answer them. Because as a new user I have no right to post links here, I can’t give any direct links to YouTube. However, all 26 parts of my documentary could be easily found by searching for '911thology' keyword on YouTube search or on Google search. Thanks.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Dang, I just realized I didn't edit my title completely. Oh, well.... it's not "realistice", but it'll do. This guy deserves a whacked out title to his thread, anyway. (Just seems fitting.)
 
It's comforting to know there are people out there who are so passionate about The Truth that they're willing to lie through their teeth to disseminate it. Also a little ironic.
 
Ok.

... so I understand quite well about nuclear explosions, their properties, effects, and I know very well about their actual relevance to the WTC -1, -2, and -7 demolitions.
Click to expand...

Well... either he means:
  • He knows enough to understand that nuclear explosions aren't relevant to the World Trade Center buildings. In which case:
    thumbs.gif
  • He's trying an appeal to authority to make it sound as if the whole "nukes at the WTC" proposal has merit. In which case:
    cuckoo-1.gif
 
Hi to everyone. I found this Forum because of my search for a place where ideas about the 9/11 could be exchanged. I registered here sometime ago, but was an 'inactive' member ever since. This one is my first post. About myself - I am a serious 9/11 researcher because of 2 different reasons. Firstly, I am a former commissioned officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence, so I understand quite well about nuclear explosions, their properties, effects, and I know very well about their actual relevance to the WTC -1, -2, and -7 demolitions.
Click to expand...

Self debunked in his first post.

While that's not a record here, it is unusual. Most of them don't self-destruct until they reach double digits.
 
Well, he's posted on Youtube. That's all I need to give his "ideas" complete credence.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
What's amazing is that he put "911" in his forum nickname, wrote a very first post bragging up on 9/11 mythology, then went... straight to Religion and Philosophy to talk about the soul.

I'm sorry, but that deserves a special smiley:

[qimg]http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n94/elmondohummus/smileys_wtf.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

That's... odd.

I don't know if he's an intelligence officer (I'd bet money that he isn't) or even "rooski". But his appearant hostility against paragraph breaks indicates "english as a second language".
 
No, he is quite likely not a Rooski. I know several Russians who speak english well, they share some peculiarities of wording and phrasing that I don't notice in 911thology's post.
 
Mancman said:
I'm watching his video now.

He's a no planer.

LOL.
Click to expand...

All the micro-nukers (and space-beamers) are.

It's weird. It's like there's an unwritten law that when you take the stupidest possible option from column 'A', you are automatically locked into the stupidest option from column 'B' as well.
 
scissorhands said:
Looks like hes been trying to pimp his book,The Third Truth, on various ct forums for a while now.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread470592/pg1

At a price of $ 51.74, it sounds like a bargain.

This bozo actually pmed me on youtube to spam his videos, thats dedicated marketing.
Click to expand...

$51.74?? :jaw-dropp OMG... Who's this guy kidding?

Barnum's quote about suckers being born every minute might be apocryphal, but I'll be damned if it doesn't ring true sometimes. All it takes is one actual believer to buy the book to prove it (I'm of course excluding certain academics - say, psychology researchers researching paranoia. That would be a legitimate and sane buyer who's not forwarding that conspiracy fantasy with a purchase).
 
Mancman said:
I'm watching his video now.

He's a no planer.

LOL.
Click to expand...

Has he got any unique arguments, or is he just spouting the standard truther canon?

As an aside, I'm telling you all, I'm damn disappointed with YouTube/Google Video and all the other vid hosting services. So much on there is so repetitious it's insane, and I'm even talking non-truther stuff. When you get to the conspiracy peddling stuff, that is practically nothing but repeats, so much so that it makes each of the 30 billion "different" captures of some actresses nude scene look unique.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom