March Stundie Nominations

Our not-so-friendly neighborhood Holocaust denier (and all-around ***) 9/11-investigator puts his racism on display for the world to see:

9/11-investigator said:
But dudalb is going to find out the hard way himself how multi-racial empires inevitably come crashing down like a high rise building stuffed with nano-thermate. But I think I used this expression before.
Click to expand...

May as well change his avatar to a swastika and have done.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Wait... nano-thermate now?
Click to expand...

Sounds like a natural progression to me.
Termite > termate > nano-termite > nano-termate.

The next substance might be a magic thermobaric that removes floors silently and without breaking windows. :D
 
Toke said:
Sounds like a natural progression to me.
Termite > termate > nano-termite > nano-termate.

The next substance might be a magic thermobaric that removes floors silently and without breaking windows. :D
Click to expand...
ive already heard a few suggest the explosives created a vacuum on each floor causing them to get sucked down faster than free fall
 
I'm still rooting for jammonius, but Especially is making a spirited bid for the title. It's a bit difficult to find the right passage to nominate him for claiming that there's something suspicious about a Canadian political speechwriter having read a speech by the Prime Minister of Australia, but there's much more to choose from.

Especially said:
The only insane person is one who says it was the 'American government'.

Who said that ?

Not me.

In fact, it was an infiltration of the US government.
Click to expand...

So it wasn't the government, it was the government, but they don't count as the government because they were infiltrators in the government, so they weren't part of the government they were part of. Right.

I expect to see a few more gems from the same source.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
I expect to see a few more gems from the same source.

Dave
Click to expand...



Well, let's just note his firm grasp of the basic facts of the 9/11 attacks:



Especially said:
Drudgewire has studied the evidence for himself. Honest ! Right, Drudgewire ? It was those Muslim bad men. 14 of them. They took over 4 planes and also took over the corporate television stations.

.....

Those 14 Arabs hated your freedoms. Ask the writers of the Patriot Act.
Click to expand...
 
OK, the forum lib invited us to has provided one:

The only problem is that structural engineering in this debate is a red herring due to the fact that the engineers did not design the building to withstand the explosives that were used and how could they considering the explosive military compound did not exist yet that brought down the towers.

you are trying to drown the incident with engineering when the truth is it is an exposives problem and has very litrtle to do with engineering.

good try though.
Click to expand...

and from the same guy:

Tom one quick question...

from an engineering standpoint are cutting edge military grade explosives taken into account when designing structures like the WTC?

If you answer No...

Then what relevance does engineering play if at all in this debate besides trying to drown the truth with your credentials?
Click to expand...

Source:

http://www.debatebothsides.com/show...for-Debunking-9-11-Conspiracy-Cultists/page18
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Zdenek Bazant ought to go claim his prize.
Click to expand...

Aw, my bad. Jimmy Walter has retracted the prize.
http://reopen911.org/
This site remains up for those who want to know. I have given up. I no longer answer email, give away DVD’s, or support the $1,000,000 challenge (which no NIST, FEMA, or other credible engineer or scientist has dared to accept). Good luck to all. It will not be a good night.

Regrettably,

Jimmy Walter
Click to expand...

If you had seen the requisites for the prize, you'd understand why no-one applied. It was batcraptastic.

In fact, that prize was the subject of the first topic about 9/11 CTs in this forum.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=48740
 
esbe said:
Point to Tomk on individual component specs here. It's actually immaterial anyway.
Click to expand...
If my argument is wrong, it didn't matter anyways. That doesn't suggest that my premise might be flawed. Maybe eggs are a good analogy:
Go get a dozen eggs, and a clear acrylic tube they'll fit in. Load the eggs, and close one end. Put in ten eggs. crack the 11th egg slightly, and load that in. Then put the 12th egg in. Now push on the top eggs to start breaking eggs, and let me know HOW LONG THE FIRST EGGS LASTS, BEFORE IT BREAKS. Do you understand the model? Don't tell me it's not applicable, it absolutely is and more: You're not going to plow through eleven eggs with the top egg. Assuming they're all absolutely identical, the top egg would break when it broke the third one down. Ad if the eggs got STRONGER the further down you went, as did the WTC, FORGET IT, GAME OVER.
Click to expand...

http://www.debatebothsides.com/show...for-Debunking-9-11-Conspiracy-Cultists/page18

Or not..:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom