Proof that 9/11 Truthers Are Dangerous and are a Threat against george bush

[Arus808]

Then the objective of those politicians was to write a story about terrorists hitting buildings in a narrative way? I hardly see any point in that tbh.

No, that was not their objective, which shows why you're stating things that are absolutely wrong.

Seems that you never bothered to read the report. I suggest that you take time off from this forum and inforwars where you are "pimping" your "successes" and read the report; its apparent that you didn't.

 

[carlitos]

You know how to use Google right?

Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence.

 

[PhantomWolf]

Ahh come on Sabrina... that's no argument for leaving it behind. I don't think so. That was also a huge loss that day.

Actually there is. They didn't dicuss the engineering of the towers in great detail either, for a specific reason, it wasn't part of their task to do so. They were tasked to investigate the attack on the US, how that attack occurred, and what could be done better in the future to prevent more attacks. WTC 7 was not a target of the terror attack, but was collateral damage, and so require no more mention than WTC 3, 4, 5, or 6 did.

Why you think it didn't have anything to do to it? I'm sorry but I don't buy this one just from this argument. It was largely and strangely overlooked. Way sloppy. There's no reason the Commission Report would deliberate leave it alone. Maybe they simply couldn't handle it as its collapse was clearly unpeculiar, reasons why NIST took so long to come up with a model to explain how the collapse could have occurred, and resisted releasing the data for some time. They had in the end to be forced to find a cause and a model to explain it, and that's what happened. I won't judge though , the results NIST did come up with, it's beyond my expertise to do so. Let the ae911truth do this, if they could ever get their new investigation going!! LOL

No the reason was simple, as stated above, it was outside of the scope of their investigation.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Is it true that the Clinton bj case cost 40 million?

Do you acknowledge that Roscoe was wrong about the costs of the multiple 9/11 investigations?

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

See how they totally ignored the fact that it took them 411 days to even have an enquiry.

That's another lie. The FBI investigation began on the day of the attacks.

Oh and by the way the latest Zogby Poll says that 47% think that the US Government had some involvement in the 911 attacks.

Yet another lie. Multiplying the number of truthers by a factor of ten doesn't help your credibility here.

 

[Baylor]

5.8%!!!

See how they totally ignored the fact that it took them 411 days to even have an enquiry.

Oh and by the way the latest Zogby Poll says that 47% think that the US Government had some involvement in the 911 attacks. Couple that with the usual 10% who are don't knows. So what's it like being a minority?

Reading the headlines is one thing. Understanding what the data say is another.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Reading the headlines is one thing. Understanding what the data say is another.
[qimg]http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt332/JREFImages/howardscripps-1.jpg[/qimg]

Oh dear... that doesn't look like 47% at all. Does it?

How embarrassing this must be for poor Roscoe.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Yeh and they still have to indict Osama Bin Laden for the 911 attacks. Check out their Most Wanted website.

Well actually some of the FBI were in fact investigating BEFORE the attacks but were told to back off.

Don't you just love whistleblowers. Especially FBI whistleblowers.

Whistleblowers will soon have a safe haven in Iceland, they're about to pass a law.

So you admit that it didn't take 411 days to start the investigation then?

That's surprising. It Usually takes alot more effort to get a truther to paint himself into a corner where he has to admit that he lied.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

Reading the headlines is one thing. Understanding what the data say is another.
http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt332/JREFImages/howardscripps-1.jpg

When was that poll taken? 12th September 2001?

Here

United States
Zogby polls

The polls that have received the most widespread media attention are those conducted by Zogby International. The Zogby polls have been sponsored by organizations within the 9/11 Truth Movement including 911truth.org.

Edited by Gaspode: 

Edited for rule 4. Text copied from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_opinion_polls.

The latest Zogby Polls featured yesterday on Russia Today put the responses that the US Government was involved in some way now at 47%.

Can I just say that I don't think the United States Government "actively planned or assisted some aspects of the attack." But like the Pearl Harbor attack they allowed it to happen.

The perpetrators were Al CIAda.

“I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks … The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.”

Osama Bin Laden to the Pakistani magazine Ummat 23rd September 2001

 

[332nd]

Yeh and they still have to indict Osama Bin Laden for the 911 attacks. Check out their Most Wanted website.

Well actually some of the FBI were in fact investigating BEFORE the attacks but were told to back off.

Don't you just love whistleblowers. Especially FBI whistleblowers.

Whistleblowers will soon have a safe haven in Iceland, they're about to pass a law.

http://whistleblowerlaws.com/

 

[Arus808]

The latest Zogby Polls featured yesterday on Russia Today put the responses that the US Government was involved in some way now at 47%.

Can I just say that I don't think the United States Government "actively planned or assisted some aspects of the attack." But like the Pearl Harbor attack they allowed it to happen.

Link to the poll. you can do it

BTW: you do understand that a poll, that is taken by the public is absolutely worth nothing in the matters where engineering, study and research is needed to fully understand what happened on 9/11. Of course, you rather argue in logical fallacies since that's all you have

 

[Baylor]

Roscoe debunked himself by copying and pasting

Only 4.8 percent of the respondents agreed that members of the United States government "actively planned or assisted some aspects of the attack."

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

The latest Zogby Polls featured yesterday on Russia Today put the responses that the US Government was involved in some way now at 47%.

Found your problem for you.

Today it's called "Russia Today", but back in the 50s to late 80s it was called "Pravda". It was every bit as accurate back then.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

So you admit that it didn't take 411 days to start the investigation then?

That's surprising. It Usually takes alot more effort to get a truther to paint himself into a corner where he has to admit that he lied.

911 Commission. But you knew that.

They were going to have Kissinger chairing it at first.

 

[Arus808]

Well he could link to the polls, because a quick look at Zogby site pulls up no 'recent' 9/11 polls. The last poll is the one that was done in August of 2007....that is the most recent.

So, "Russia Today" quotes 3 year old polls?


Nice that Roscoe wont back up his claims with where he is pulling those numbers from.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

Found your problem for you.

Today it's called "Russia Today", but back in the 50s to late 80s it was called "Pravda". It was every bit as accurate back then.

It was just before they did a feature about the CIA camps in Poland and Lithuania. They were interviewing Richard Cage and Annie Machon (former MI5)

We know things are bad

Yes we now have to go to Russia to get anything close to the truth from the mainstream media

 

[Baylor]

Well he could link to the polls, because a quick look at Zogby site pulls up no 'recent' 9/11 polls. The last poll is the one that was done in August of 2007....that is the most recent.

So, "Russia Today" quotes 3 year old polls?


Nice that Roscoe wont back up his claims with where he is pulling those numbers from.

He copy and pasted it. Hence his self debunking

"Only 4.8 percent of the respondents agreed that members of the United States government "actively planned or assisted some aspects of the attack."
~~~Roscoe the First~~~

 

[Arus808]

Rsocoe, where is that recent poll that Russia Today "quoted". You used the word recent in your post; you claimed 47% . Please back that up. The most recent poll about 9/11 happened in AUGUST of 2007. 4.6% polled believed that our Govt made it happen. You misplaced your decimal it seems.

ETA: Saw the reply after I posted. Thanks to UnlovedRebel.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

911 Commission. But you knew that.

They were going to have Kissinger chairing it at first.

Right, so you understand that the investigation began on the day of the attacks?

Just say yes or no.

 

[Baylor]

Oh and by the way the latest Zogby Poll says that 47% think that the US Government had some involvement in the 911 attacks. Couple that with the usual 10% who are don't knows. So what's it like being a minority?

Only 4.8 percent of the respondents agreed that members of the United States government "actively planned or assisted some aspects of the attack."

Stundie