Continuation - The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kit, will you kindly stop beating around the bush, and deliver those bombshells you've been promising since last night?

My apologies, Vort and to everybody. I'm not intentionally trying to create suspense. I was a little spent after the monster posts I did yesterday. I could just give the highlights, but I want everything put out in the context that I experienced it. I will do this tonight or tomorrow for sure while it's still fresh.
 
Still can't do anything about that upper-arm comparison...and Patty's 'elbow-reach' measurements, eh???

Do you think you ever will be able too, kitz?

Yes, when I get an answer from you about the agreement I suggested in the form of a yes/no. Will you be answering?


Thanks for the family news on him, though. He's a fortunate man.

You're welcome. Yes, he is. Honest, too. Sweaty, why did Heironimus deny being in Roger's doc film, being Patty, and tried to cover for him when first approached by Long. That is not the behaviour of a pathological liar looking for attention.
 
Vort wrote:

I see you failed to actually address anything Vort wrote in that post. Are you incapable of doing that? Uh-oh...

:id:

kitakaze wrote:

Sweaty, can you explain in a rational and coherent manner how it is not insanity to have a living, eating, breeding, pooping great big animal walking around in New York, Arkansas, Nova Scotia, New Mexico, everywhere and not be dead and dissected somewhere.

You know, like a real conversation. You can't and you won't, I guarantee. It is simply beyond your mental capabilities. Minds like yours simply can not get into that sort of problem solving. It's better for you just to have a technicolour font-gasm than ever actually sit down and really talk with people and not at them. No, Sweaty, you are not capable of having real conversations with people. At least not with people not suffering from fortean addiction as you are.
 
Last edited:
Yes, when I get an answer from you about the agreement I suggested in the form of a yes/no. Will you be answering?

Sweaty, why did Heironimus deny being in Roger's doc film, being Patty, and tried to cover for him when first approached by Long. That is not the behaviour of a pathological liar looking for attention.


Patty's extreme 'elbow-reach' TRUMPS all of your gobbledy-gook, posted above. :)


Sorry.
 
And now Part Two of Part Two - Talking With Bob Heironimus Part Two:

This is continuing on from the point in the conversation where I asked Bob about the rumour that he went to Gimlin telling him that he was going to confess, asking Gimlin to do the same, to which Gimlin refused, saying he had been lying about it too long and had to stay safe...

At this point I really wanted to get a better sense of what the relationship was between Heiroinimus and Gimlin. It had really preoccupied my imagination thinking about the bizarre state of the PGF controversy where the two principle people remaining, Bob and Bob, lived on the exact same street nine doors apart, as they had since before the film was shot in October, 1967. I asked Bob, "Bob, one thing that I really wanted to ask you about is your relationship with Gimlin. I'm talking about over the years and now, also. How has it been between you two?"

"Oh, you know," Bob answered, "We see each other all the time. I just saw him 'bout two weeks ago at a horse sale." "Yeah, I remember you mentioned that last time." "We didn't talk anything about Bigfoot or whatever, though." I jumped in, "Now, can you tell me when you did last discuss anything about the film?" "Discuss what?" he asked. "I said 'when was the last time you did discuss the film?'" "Oh jeez, I can't really remember. It's been so many years, you see. I'm getting kinda old, you know, and it gets all mixed up in there."

"Of course," I answered, "I understand so much of it must be hard to recall. So you don't remember exactly the last time you discussed the film with Gimlin." "Not exactly, no. It was a few years ago, I think." Even that helped me understand better. I was getting the picture in the years since Greg Long's The Making of Bigfoot had been published, that things had mellowed between the two men on South 90th. "So how has it been between the two of you over the years, you know, since the movie?" I asked. "Well, it was a bit rough there for a while just after that book came out. I know he was not too happy with me, but you know, Bob, he's kind of a small little fella. I wasn't too worried about it." I found that to be hilarious, the way Bob was talking. I was imagining Gimlin marching out of his house and storming down the street to Heironimus' house, nostrils flared, violence on his mind, pounding on Heironimus' door and jumping on him like a crazed wolverine when Heironimus opened up.

I turned my thoughts back to the situation. "But you guys did remain friends, right?" "Oh yeah, we still saw each other all the time. I mean, it's hard not to, being right there and all. We always see each other out on the road there when he's coming down. We talk on the street." "I see," I said. There was the reality. These two older men in that tiny town removed from the world that ceaselessly went on and on debating the film on their computers. They were there in Yakima removed from the world, and removed in their age and lifestyle from the people at their PC's discussing the film day in and day out. I knew Heironimus was, anyway. He had told me before when I asked him if he uses email "No, not really," and neither had he ever heard of youtube. I knew they had a computer, though, because Bob's wife, Glenda, had recently found the email I had sent her last year. Bob Gimlin, I thought possibly to be a different story. I knew from a recent interview that he had seen the Mike Greene thermal video that somebody had sent him. I knew also the Bigfoot enthusiasts who organized the "Yakima Round-Up" in honour of Bob were also in regular contact with him. That interview seemed to indicate that Bob followed developements regarding the film on the Internet. It can be heard here...

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/mnbrt/2010/02/13/mnbrt-radio-with-bob-gimlin

I changed topics from Bob's relationship with Gimlin to something else I had wanted to know. "So, another thing I was wondering about, Bob, was if you've, you know, faced any kind of hostility towards you over the film there in Yakima or anywhere else since you came out with your confession." "How do you mean?" he asked. "I mean like, from people who thought the film was real, like, supporters being hostile to you." "Uh huh, I see. No. Not to my face anyway. They don't have the guts. I'd pop 'em in the nose if they did. On the radio show some people call in callin' me a liar. Didn't bother me none. They wanna keep believin', they can go to hell. I don't care. I was there." "Yeah," I replied. "Too bad for them. It's amazing what some people will hold on to. You should see the people I deal with day to day. Total fanatics. Doodling on stills from the film, saying it couldn't be you. Your elbows couldn't fit. Blah blah blah. It get's pretty mind-numbing after a while."

Crap! Here we go! I thought. It was time to start asking Bob about the suit. I did a scramble to look at my notes and the questions I had neatly written out... and then scribbled little jotted notes all over as ideas and questions had come to me. Damn it! I could hardly read what I wrote and had gotten too into my conversation to keep focused on the notepad. I dropped it and decided to wing it. "So, anyway, I had some things wanted to ask you about the suit, if you don't mind." "Sure," he answered. "Tell me about the suit. Like, did it have any padding inside it or was that all just you?" "Oh yeah, it had a lotta padding in it. Had these great big shoulder pads in it. They went around me. You know, like football padding." "Right," I said, trying to keep calm. I thought of the 1951 Yakima High School photo of Roger Patterson's football team. I was pumped! This is exactly what I was after. I was floored. I had been wondering about this for years. The only thing I had known Bob had said about padding was that the head had padding like an oldtime football helmet. Most of all I was excited that he had spoken about shoulder pads first without me leading him in any kind of way. Bob went on, "And there was padding in the head. Like a helmet type of thing. Bunch up at the top. And there was a great big bunch of padding in the butt. I don't know if you've seen that." I was laughing on the inside. I had seen the miserable diaper butt more times than Bob would ever care to know. "Yeah, I have. It looks pretty bad. There's no butt crack!" I quipped. Bob started laughing. "The legs felt kind of like hip boots, you know? And you can see my wallet! Forgot to take my wallet out." He laughed again.

That wallet thing, I thought to myself. That was something I had heard before. Right under what was a completely unreal folding crease on Patty's leg there was a bulge that had been famously called by Bigfooters as a hernia on Patty's leg. I thought of the argument that the bulge could not possibly be Bob's wallet because it was too low on the leg. "So which pocket was the wallet in?" I asked. "My side pocket,' he replied. "Yeah, the Bigfooters call that a hernia." Bob started chuckling. I decided it was time for a different question. "So there's this thing that people talk about. About you saying the suit stunk. Like it had an odour. What can you tell me about that? What kind of odour was it?" "Well, you see it was the face. Roger had altered the face. He made it of horsehide, I think he said, which can stink. It was right in my face. And they said something about the suit being made out of dynel, which they say can have an odour, too." This was amazing, I thought. This completely altered everything we had been discussing about the point of the suit having an odour. I had to be clear. "So the whole suit was horsehide or it was just the face?" "Just the face, I think," he replied. A different thought occurred to me then. "So inside the suit, there wasn't anything like an inner layer, like a muscle suit or padding?" "No, just the shoulders, the head, and the butt. I was in pretty good shape back then." Fantastic, I thought to myself.

I looked at the clock and realized that it was getting close to dinnertime. I had other important questions I wanted to ask Bob about the suit, but I knew I would be able to speak with Bob anytime. I remembered the rumour about Pat Patterson hiring an attorney to reveal the PGF as a hoax and how it was done upon her passing. I explained the rumour to Bob, that it was said to have come from Tom Biscardi and asked if he had ever heard any such thing. "No," he said. "I hadn't heard anything like that." This was before the call I made to Biscardi right after my conversation with Bob, in which Tom confirmed the rumour as being false. We continued chatting. Bob then asked me, "Did you know that National Geographic came out here?" "Yes," I said. "The Is It real? show." "Yeah, they screwed me!" Bob exclaimed. "They showed the one thing we asked them not to show. Us havin' fun and making some faces just sittin' around at the bar. The dog hiding under the chair and all that. We were just jokin' around. They filmed a bunch of stuff. They filmed me in a suit. Had me do the walk. Had me riding up in the mountains. They didn't show any of that. Just the part I asked them to leave out and they promised they would. They made the whole thing look like a joke." I thought that was very interesting.

Bob and I continued chatting about various things. I asked him about his '55 Chevy and how that was doing. I asked him if he could still ride horses and he said that he couldn't since he had his hip replaced. "I like to get out and go bowling in the evenings. Get some strikes there. Gonna get back to it slowly. I'll ride again. Probably take a couple years." I asked Bob about his mother after remembering that Lucas had mentioned she was ill. "She's doing great," he said. "She's just turned ninety, you know. Yep, she's moving around on her own. She still drives herself. She was a little sick for a bit but she's doing much better now." "That's great," I said. "I'm so glad to hear that."

We continued chatting and Bob brought up the Bigfoot documentary featuring Vancouver Island he had watched that day. Bob, it turned out was a complete skeptic about Bigfoot. "They never find nuthin'. No hair, no bones, no scat, no bodies. And people keep saying they seen one everywhere." "No kidding!" I said. "Everywhere. You name it. Florida, Iowa, Texas, Alaska." Bob continued, "They're not real. They woulda been found by now. No way." Bob then said it was getting about time for dinner and I thanked Bob kindly for the time he spent talking to me. I told him I'll keep working on my project and be in touch with him regularly. We said goodbye and hung up. I was elated. I had accomplished everything I had set out to do in that phone call and opened the door to a relationship of trust with Bob. He had told me things that would change much of what we discussed concerning the PGF. Now things were really moving, I thought to myself.

So there it is. I apologize for the delay, but it takes quite a bit of time for me to get everything down. My next phone call to Bob I'll be introducing myself to his wife, Glenda, and be asking her about when she had first been told about Bob being the man in the Bigfoot film. I would love to talk with his mother, Opal, also, who said she saw the suit. She is 90, however, and I can't expect to much. Everyone feel free to continue offering questions for me to ask Bob. As Bob and I get more familiar with each other I will start to ask him more difficult questions, such as the discrepancy of the suit he described, and that described by Philip Morris. I have many plans regarding myself and Bob and will keep everybody updated as things progress.
 
Last edited:
I see you failed to actually address anything Vort wrote in that post. Are you incapable of doing that?



I already have....in post #426....(with a graphic comparison)...

Amazingly....Bob matches Bob, extremely closely.....if not perfectly. This, despite the many differences in the taking of the pictures....such as cameras, lenses, distances, angles...etc.


Funny, how Bob matches Bob, with/despite all of those differences...yet, when Bob is compared to "Bob/Patty"...he NEVER matches...(at the key points...the eyes, elbow-joints, and knee joints...which are unaffected by padding). :)


...and in post #421...


Secondly....I don't subsribe to the "ALL or NOTHING" philosophy that the scoftics of JREF subscribe to.

Just because a comparison isn't 100% accurate, it DOES NOT mean that's it's 100% in error....or totally worthless.
That type of thinking is only for people who have an agenda to protect. (Throw it all out!!! :wink: )


Thirdly....while the principles Odinn mentioned do have merit....the "variables" that he's making reference to will, over the course of multiple comparisons, using multiple images of Bob and Patty, taken from multiple angles......average out, to some degree.

This 'averaging out' will cause the comparisons to sometimes favor Bob's arm length, or elbow-reach, moreso than Patty's....as appearing to be the longer length...if, in fact, their arms/elbows/body widths were actually equal....or very close to it.

But that NEVER happens.....that "day NEVER comes". The reason why that is...is very simple.....Patty's arms are longer than Bob's....Patty's elbow does reach further away from her backbone than Bob's does...Patty's upper-torso is wider.....and deeper....than Bob's.



Try to keep up, there, Chief! :)
 
Patty's extreme 'elbow-reach' TRUMPS all of your gobbledy-gook, posted above. :)


Sorry.

You know, I would swear I've heard that before. That copypasta post there quoted two questions of mine. Can you please answer them or are you just going to keep refusing?
 
Great stuff, K. Great stuff. I can hear they screaming... At least their quoted screams...

Idea- Woods n' Wildmen MUST have Jethro Tull at its soundtrack. "Songs from the Woods" is mandatory; "Bungle in the Jungle" is optional, indicated for "The Stumpknockers" every time Creekfreak is mentioned.
 
Great stuff, K. Great stuff. I can hear they screaming... At least their quoted screams...

Idea- Woods n' Wildmen MUST have Jethro Tull at its soundtrack. "Songs from the Woods" is mandatory; "Bungle in the Jungle" is optional, indicated for "The Stumpknockers" every time Creekfreak is mentioned.

Fanfrickintastic, Correa! Absolutely!

Bungle in the Jungle...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJhAyg2LTEk

Songs From the Wood...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2MgU7PNHgw

Creekfreak is a definite entry in the Stumpknockers section.

Tenacious D is also a must...

 
Kit, will there be a paragraph or two covering bulletmaker types and their hoaxes for profit?
 
Kit, will there be a paragraph or two covering bulletmaker types and their hoaxes for profit?

Absolutely. Of course, Bulletmaker would be one of the first entries to the Stumpknockers section. The photo used would be this...

picture.php


Bulletmaker and his whole situation in terms of profit motivation was secondary to his attention motivation, I believe. He had the CD's for sale, of course, but I doubt he could have payed for his weekly allotment of Wild Turkey with what he got from that. He behaved in a way where it was more that he was a crazy old mischievous redneck, flailingly racist, sexist, and messed in the head. When you're that filthy and wretched, I think you're glad for any attention you can get. The MABRC did well to toss that crazy old fart.

Matt Whitton and Rick Dyer would near the top of the list for hoaxes for profit. The PGF being #1, of course.
 
Kit, thanks for posting your very engaging conversations with Bob. I hope and trust the recollections he provides will be of considerable use to the skeptical community in showing that the PG figure is most likely a suit, most likely worn by Heinonimous per his claim.

One discrepancy that does bother me, though, is Bob's assertion that the only padding was in the head, butt and shoulders. As Sweaty keeps pointing out, and which is evident in any comparison pics, the torso width of the PG figure is much greater than that of Bob in normal clothes.

I don't know if that width can be explained by the physics of linking padded shoulders to padded pelvis, by the problems inherent in digital squashing and/or lengthening of imagery, by all of these factors, or if it cannot be explained within the "Heironimous in a suit" framework at all.
 
Also, I love the website idea; your outline seems very thorough and comprehensive, and I look forward to seeing it up! The Tull soundtrack suggested by Correa is mandatory.
 
Ask him about the boobies Kit, ask him about the boobies. I'm thinking Roger had a great explanation as to why BobH had to walk around with those monsters dragging him down.

He might have even pulled out the drawing er- Storyboard showing the Sasquatch avec breasts.
 
Kit, thanks for posting your very engaging conversations with Bob. I hope and trust the recollections he provides will be of considerable use to the skeptical community in showing that the PG figure is most likely a suit, most likely worn by Heinonimous per his claim.

One discrepancy that does bother me, though, is Bob's assertion that the only padding was in the head, butt and shoulders. As Sweaty keeps pointing out, and which is evident in any comparison pics, the torso width of the PG figure is much greater than that of Bob in normal clothes.

I don't know if that width can be explained by the physics of linking padded shoulders to padded pelvis, by the problems inherent in digital squashing and/or lengthening of imagery, by all of these factors, or if it cannot be explained within the "Heironimous in a suit" framework at all.

It's possible the entire suit was padded so it would keep it's shape. Bob most likely would not have noticed that padding since it would be uniform, but what he did notice were the the parts that were overly-padded.
 
YAY!
BOOBS!

Ask him about the BOOBS! How they were made, if they were hairy, how large they were, their shape, if they were hard, how they felt, the size of the nipples, if they were sensitive... whoops... erm...

OK, you've got the picture.
 
Im mostly a lurker here but I love all this. Great stuff Kit. Seems i had a near miss with my sole contribution to bigfootery. My "bunch of keys in the pocket" theory was close. No Cigar but close.

Keep it up Kit.
 
I'm mainly a lurker around here as well, but I had to log on to say great stuff there kitakaze. I think Bob has sufficiently laid to rest any doubt (for me anyways) about the Patterson footage. Thanks for all the time and effort you've put into your research and interview.
 
Vort wrote:
One discrepancy that does bother me, though, is Bob's assertion that the only padding was in the head, butt and shoulders. As Sweaty keeps pointing out, and which is evident in any comparison pics, the torso width of the PG figure is much greater than that of Bob in normal clothes.

I don't know if that width can be explained by the physics of linking padded shoulders to padded pelvis, by the problems inherent in digital squashing and/or lengthening of imagery, by all of these factors, or if it cannot be explained within the "Heironimous in a suit" framework at all.


Quite true, Vort. Patty is definitely the "wide-body" model. ;)


On a related note....here is something I threw together on my lunch break.

This graphic shows how the 'elbow-reach' measures when the subject's arm is swung both out to the side, and, in the forward direction....


BalletElbowReach3C.jpg



This combination of arm-angles closely replicates Patty's arm position, in this frame....(the angle-of-views are very close, also)...



PattyBalletElbowReach1.jpg





The one aspect of the 'elbow-reach' I haven't looked into much, yet, is how the arm being swung forward affects the accuracy of the measurement of the elbow position/reach, in the lateral direction.

It may introduce some error...making the elbow appear to reach further away from the backbone laterally, than it actually does.

But, in the graphic above...with the woman's arm clearly swung forward, there seems to be only a minimal, if any, error introduced into the figure.


Patty's elbow still significantly out-distances your "average-proportioned human". :)

(Due to her extra-wide skeletal frame...and unusually long upper arm.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom