whatever. her ideas are insane. and stupid.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons
- Thread starter PookztA
- Start date
whatever. her ideas are insane. and stupid.
Tony Szamboti
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,976
There are nut cases in every segment of society. I am sure there are plenty of nut cases who don't believe 911 was an inside job too. For that matter, at this point I think one needs to be a little nutty to believe it was anything but.
Last edited:
TJM
Potsing Whiled Runk
Arus808
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 6,204
9/11 Commission was NOT an engineer report. They based their time on a pre-published non final version and the FEMA statements. IT was not based on any study or research done by either group
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/local_links.php?catid=18
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/local_links.php?catid=18
A W Smith
Philosopher
It appears you have some reading to do Abe, Your crap has already been debunked here up to half a decade ago. I have provided three pages of links exclusive to the JREF which you appear to have ignored. Come back when you have something new. We already flushed that turd.
Here's page four
Here's page four
- A Thermite/Thermate Question - JREF Forum
40 posts - 20 authors - Last post: Oct 10, 2008
That would be Judy Wood wierd. There is a cast thermite that I occassionally make which uses a sugar and potassium permangante igniter, ...
forums.randi.org › ... › 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Cached - Similar - - [Moderated] Steel structures cannot globally collapse due to ...
40 posts - 17 authors - Last post: Jan 25, 2009
Judy Wood? Hey, driving a train isn't as easy as it looks, even though you don't have to steer. CORed is offline Quote this post in a PM ...
forums.randi.org › ... › Conspiracy Theories › 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Cached - - Why “The Twin Towers Fell at Free Fall” is The Dumbest Thing I've ...
40 posts - 18 authors - Last post: May 4, 2006
Anyone notice that Judy Wood has a distinctly Osamaish nose? .... About the pancake theory, by the way, and how Judy Wood thinks each floor ...
forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=56227 - Cached - Similar - - David Chandler Proves that Nothing Can Ever Collapse - Page 4 ...
Feb 28, 2010 ... Judy Wood was in your select group, the beam weapon lady, how is she doing with your movement? You are right, if there is not big impact ...
forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=168450&page=4 - Cached - - Haiti Earthquake and HAARP - JREF Forum
40 posts - 24 authors - Last post: Jan 18
It must have been the HAARP weather control beam that works beautifully on New Orleans, Haiti, and 9/11 (Judy Wood) but is woefully ...
forums.randi.org › ... › General Topics › Conspiracy Theories - Cached - - The sad case of Niels Harrit - JREF Forum
Jim Fetzer and Judy Wood come to mind as prime suspects. Judging from a recent interview with Kevin Ryan he actually believes that several companies which ...
forums.randi.org › ... › 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Cached - Similar - - Structural Engineers speaking up - what now? - JREF Forum
40 posts - 23 authors - Last post: May 27, 2008
Why do you not do this? Surely you aren't afraid of being laughed out, are you? Someone should introduce him to Judy Wood...lol ...
forums.randi.org › ... › 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Cached - Similar - - On the Truth Movement and Irreducible Delusion - JREF Forum
40 posts - 26 authors - Last post: Jul 13, 2008
While the author finds Dr. Judy Wood's hypotheses equally fantastic and unsupported, and her facts regarding degree of pulverization etc. ...
forums.randi.org › ... › 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Cached - Similar - - Has This Structural Engineer Been Debunked? - Page 5 - JREF Forum
There's no point bringing this up to Steven Jones or Judy Wood or what have you, and you know it. They'll give you some doubletalk and try to accomodate ...
forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=107390&page=5 - Cached - - What is this new military capability Woodward is talking about ...
40 posts - 22 authors - Last post: Sep 20, 2008
Now if Judy Wood were talking about sapce beams, then yes, the burden is on her to provide evidence before we even give it a thought. ...
forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=123003 - Cached -
no, because you have not refuted it.
So you are telling me the 9/11 Commission Report is MISTAKEN? yet you believe them? How hypocritical... don't you think?
Arus808
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 6,204
9/11 Commision was not an ENGINEERING report. They based their statement on pre-published non finalized conclusions and statements from FEMA.
Dtugg,
I have to get going soon becaue I have midterms to study for, but I will check back now and then.
It seems very odd to me that you think the 9/11 Commission Report was 'mistaken', yet many of you seem to believe in the official story with quite a bit of vigor. Very hypocritical of you to say that the story you believe in was mistaken....
Here are two videos of the collapses for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5q7vz3ZEfBw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3X-NvZBG04
just in case you want to time them for yourself
-Abe
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M1 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology
I have to get going soon becaue I have midterms to study for, but I will check back now and then.
It seems very odd to me that you think the 9/11 Commission Report was 'mistaken', yet many of you seem to believe in the official story with quite a bit of vigor. Very hypocritical of you to say that the story you believe in was mistaken....
Here are two videos of the collapses for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5q7vz3ZEfBw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3X-NvZBG04
just in case you want to time them for yourself
-Abe
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M1 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology
Sword_Of_Truth
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
- Messages
- 11,494
Sorry, Abe. You lost when you said "Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons" (note the underlined part).
A W Smith
Philosopher
Sure I have, you just don't want to hear it. The collapses took significantly longer than ten seconds, therefore Judy Wood's "debunking" is meaningless.
It wasn't an engineering report. Them being mistaken about the time it took the towers has no effect whatsoever on their mission.
The Big Dog
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 29,742
Nice of you to repeatedly hotlink that stupid billiard ball picture from Judy's site.
Let Judy pay for it!!
Let Judy pay for it!!
A W Smith
Philosopher
Abe:
Simple question, was the 9/11 Report an engineering report? or not? if you assert that it was. Proceed to name the engineers that were on that Commission, Fair enough?
Simple question, was the 9/11 Report an engineering report? or not? if you assert that it was. Proceed to name the engineers that were on that Commission, Fair enough?
Cl1mh4224rd
Philosopher
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2006
- Messages
- 9,778
That's been covered in one those 30 links to which you refuse to subject your fragile delusion. The time cited is how long it took for the first external panels to impact the ground. It is not the total time of collapse.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster - Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (August 30, 2006), #6.
no we don't. i and most of this nation is more than satisfied by the more than 4 investigations into 9-11.
From the NIST FAQ you just linked me too, which I looked at several times:
6. How could the WTC towers collapse in only 11 seconds (WTC 1) and 9 seconds (WTC 2)—speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)?
NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels to strike the ground after the collapse initiated in each of the towers to be approximately 11 seconds for WTC 1 and approximately 9 seconds for WTC 2. These elapsed times were based on: (1) precise timing of the initiation of collapse from video evidence, and (2) ground motion (seismic) signals recorded at Palisades, N.Y., that also were precisely time-calibrated for wave transmission times from lower Manhattan (see NCSTAR 1-5A).
Last edited:
What is wrong with you? You actually think that one mistake means that a new investigation is required? Are you serious?
Cl1mh4224rd
Philosopher
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2006
- Messages
- 9,778
Check your words. To contest something means to question it. You're saying here that you do not question that the 9/11 Commission Report is an engineering report. That's wrong.
I'm sure what you meant to say was, "I do not claim it was an engineering report."