• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

H.a.a.r.p

Sweet, thanks for the explanation Cosmic Roy, much appreciated, I've got a better understanding now.

Some reason im still interested on thinking about seismic waves and now maybe a link to gravity or anti-gravity, why, i don't know yet. I wish i wasn't cap i would watch this video again about anti-gravity by Body Bushman, i remember it to be mind blowing but i forget most now lol *slaps head*.

Boyd Bushman On The Hutchison Effect Antigravity - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv8WwnWJDmw

You're very welcome.

The technology to create and modify gravitational fields does exist: like electromagnetic fields, it just requires manipulation of the charge carriers of the field. In the case of electrical engineering, that's generally electrons. For gravitational engineering any particle with mass will do. Unfortunately, given the relative weakness of the gravitational force, one has to move quite a lot of mass to produce an appreciable effect. If you want to cancel out gravity in your locale, try to find a way to suspend approximately 6 x 1024 kg above you.

If the force of gravity could be manipulated and cancelled by more convenient and subtle methods, then I don't doubt that one could do interesting things seismologically. But speculating in that direction is fruitless. Claims by John Hutchison and other cranks take us no closer to such technology. Incidentally, I started to watch that video, and in the context of Newtonian dynamics and relativity, the interviewee brought out one of these toys! I mean... what?!
 
Sweet, thanks for the explanation Cosmic Roy, much appreciated, I've got a better understanding now.

Some reason im still interested on thinking about seismic waves and now maybe a link to gravity or anti-gravity, why, i don't know yet. I wish i wasn't cap i would watch this video again about anti-gravity by Body Bushman, i remember it to be mind blowing but i forget most now lol *slaps head*.

Boyd Bushman On The Hutchison Effect Antigravity - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv8WwnWJDmw
Bushman is a charlatan.

Consider the flim-flam he performs at about 03:10.
He claims (at 02:30) that during his work on stealth that, "As I conducted the tests, every now and then nature would not give us what we wanted, but it gave us something else, and I would sweep it under the rug because it didn't match theory.
And after a while I said, "that's not honest, that is not proper.", you must record the data properly".".

He then "demonstrates" that Newton's law that, "anything that is in motion tends to stay in motion", by spinning a plastic celt (03:10).

A celt is a mechanical device built so it has a preference to rotate in one diretion. Like the best flim-flam artist, he keeps assuring the reporter that it is a simple piece of plastic that has "in it" that can be seen to explain this exception to Newton's theory.

Pseudoscience at its worst...
 
If Disaster Area played, not only would it cause an earthquake but their documented effect on telepathic powers would probably make us all psychic.

Apart from rorylee, of course. He'd lose his psychic powers.
 
rorylee said:
Rorylee: The earthquakes were not caused by HAARP, and here's why. Its use leaves a characteristic signature that the military has not been able to eliminate. Just before the earthquake hits, there's a series of low-frequency buzzings, like a bicycle horn. Then concentric depressions appear all around.
The military doesn't want to use this superweapon until they can get rid of the HAARP O marks.

Ahh k, interesting to say the least. How do you know this?

I assure you it came from as authoritative a source as any other information you may find regarding the properties of earthquakes caused by HAARP.
 
I assure you it came from as authoritative a source as any other information you may find regarding the properties of earthquakes caused by HAARP.

Don't be such a Grouch. Oh, do tell him where you got the information from... :boxedin:
 
Rorylee: The earthquakes were not caused by HAARP, and here's why. Its use leaves a characteristic signature that the military has not been able to eliminate. Just before the earthquake hits, there's a series of low-frequency buzzings, like a bicycle horn. Then concentric depressions appear all around.
The military doesn't want to use this superweapon until they can get rid of the HAARP O marks.

The had the exact same problem with Continental High Intensity Coalator (CHIC). The signs were slightly different but a trained observer could usually tell the difference between CHIC O marks and HAARP O marks. On the other hand, records of Geologic Underground Motion Machine (GUMM) O marks are almost unknown.
 
Does the new Super Kilowatt Intensity Decimator weapon leave any tell tale marks?
 
Ahh k, interesting to say the least. How do you know this?

I could relate that back to Speculation #2 with someone knowing where the O marks came from and hitting back at the source of it :D Speculation of course. But does make sense.

for example - Japan uses weapon on Chile - O marks left and source found/traced to be coming from Japan - Jedi Strikes back at Japan Island, saying we know it was you lol.


Anybody else hear a really loud whooshing sound?
 
Does the new Super Kilowatt Intensity Decimator weapon leave any tell tale marks?


It does, but the marks can be fairly quickly and quietly eliminated by using Coupled, Long-Orbiting, Randomly Oscillating Xrays.
 
.
You mean other than the fact that it's not possible to "rip apart" a nuclear explosion and "take only the seismic wave?"

Can one "rip apart" a piano and take only the music?
.

Record each note. Then assign it to a key of a non-piano instrument. That is how these are made. Other instruments are "ripped apart" to be included into this portable device. "Ripping the bang" out of an atomic explosion may be a bit harder....
 
The had the exact same problem with Continental High Intensity Coalator (CHIC). The signs were slightly different but a trained observer could usually tell the difference between CHIC O marks and HAARP O marks. On the other hand, records of Geologic Underground Motion Machine (GUMM) O marks are almost unknown.

What about the idea that the O marks are caused by Geological Resonance-Orbiting Underwater Compact Halos? I hear one of those once shot an elephant in his pajamas.
 

Back
Top Bottom