The character was obviously drawn partly based on the the actress. Cicero, why do you feel the need to disparage her looks?
You actually believe that the character has a physical resemblance to AHH? Now who is being insulting.
The character was obviously drawn partly based on the the actress. Cicero, why do you feel the need to disparage her looks?
She was part of the conspiracy to "insult" Palin, obviously.
You actually believe that the character has a physical resemblance to AHH? Now who is being insulting.
AHH has already admitted the intent was to make fun of Palin.Palin didn't see the humor and thought it was an insult to her family. How many times do we need to go over this for you? There is no more conspriacy involved in this "Family Guy" episode than any other episode. But if the non-confirmed edited portion of the AHH's email was legit, AHH does insult Trigg by referring to him as a loaf of French bread.
They're both obviously blond and a little heavy-set--I'm not insulting anyone.
Now you are making fun of her weight. Come on. Where is your compassion?
Wow! She said Palin is treating him like a loaf of bread. Clearly not an insult to Trigg at all. I can't believe you would spin her words so blatantly to the point of completely different meaning. Why are you attacking a woman with down syndrome (dishonestly unless you misread the interview), given your support for Palin's outrage about supposedly "making fun" of down syndrome sufferers?
It's fun to watch a poster so thoroughly humiliate himself.![]()
Now you are making fun of her weight. Come on. Where is your compassion?
Don't be so hard on yourself.
It's fun to watch a poster so thoroughly humiliate himself.![]()
Wow, why so defensive there, lil' fella? Do you assume I'm referring to you?
No. I assumed you were referring to yourself. Therefore, I was being supportive.
Entertaining isn't it? Want some popcorn? [qimg]http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/1939/63713938qaeedjg9popcornt.gif[/qimg]
Say, now that I have your attention, in this thread (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=165887&page=3), you made the claim that I said I didn't know who Howard Zinn was. I challenged you to point out where I said that, and you never replied. Maybe you can do that now, or are you still afraid?
No, what is confusing is that I use posters like you and skeptigirl (among others) as my forum "canaries in a coal mine". Meaning, that if I am unfamiliar with an issue, I can always count on my canaries to post the opposite of what is true. It saves me from having to research every topic. I can know the correct position without time consuming research. So when 2 canaries post opposing opinions, it creates a logical conundrum. Now I have to investigate it myself. If I have the time. And the interest. Which I don't.
He didn't quote her, he paraphrased her. His paraphrasing was accurate. Your silly nitpicking is just more dishonesty who isn't fooling anyone (but thanks for the lols).