• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
walkyrie said:
Originally Posted by bill smith
I believe this gem from Mike Rivero absolutely. Who wants to deny this Truth.

"Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all."
Click to expand...

The george bush regime officials are Running Scared trying to help with coverup about the 911 World Trade Center Controlled Demolition Explosives ,the george bush Attempt to cover up and hide the Controlled Demolition Disintegration Explosives of the WTC with a Faked collapse , was just a poor attempt , and was not enough to hide the WTC Controlled Demolition Disintegration Explosives , only stupid people are swallowing the george bush regime official theory Lies about 9/11, the Truthers are Chasing the goorge bush regime officials
Click to expand...
a double dose of insane ideas from two delusion expert deep in the pit of ignorance, 911 truth

Should there of been vaporization and justification?

Bush is not president, we had an election. Bush forgot to declare martial law and call off the election! Do you get this stuff from neoNAZIs or do you make it up? It is suspected bill smith has a delusion google filter to help her find idiotic tripe on 911.
1Truth911GoogleFilter.jpg


the goorge bush regime officials
Click to expand...
Did we miss president goorge?

(RedIbis, on the other hand, exists to me only in quoted form). - Gravy (Mark Roberts)
Why is RedIbis hung up on Gravy?
walkyrie, hey, you are up on current events, what is up with RedIbis and Gravy?

Where did walkyrie go? Poor RedIbis misses Gravy. 8 years and RedIbis keep falling back into the pit of ignorace off that fense of knowlege, you need knowldedge to cross that fense; 8 years and you could have earned PhD to help RedIbis over that fense. But...

george bush regime officials are Running Scared
Click to expand...
No they are UNEMPLOYED. Not exactly true, but they are no longer part of a regime. They were part of the executive office, that is something you failed to gain knowledge in at school.

help with coverup about the 911 World Trade Center Controlled Demolition
Click to expand...
No need to do much about a 911 truth idiotic insane delusion. No joy here.

a Faked collapse
Click to expand...
Fake? This is pure... wow - the WTC towers are still standing,,, news at 11; oops

only stupid people are swallowing the george bush regime official theory Lies about 9/11
Click to expand...
Who? Names? And a list of the lies about 911 from the Bush executive office.

the Truthers are Chasing the goorge bush regime officials
Click to expand...
standup.jpg

Yes, the truthers are chasing Bush, and doing the best they can.
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
At the risk of stating the obvious, we have a two term limit for presidents here in the US. They weren't elected OUT of office.
Click to expand...

Ah yes... the resident troll shows up.

At the risk of being very obtuse, you have succeeded.

Lets see. To follow a simple chain of logic. Are you ready red?

GWB and Cheney order wtc false flag event.

Now, what was their political party? (I mean we always hear how McCain was just going to be another GWB). Since the country moved to the left and chose a democrat into the white house (instead of McCain... you know GWB lite), would the democrats help cover it up?

I do know that reading for comprehension isn't your strong suit, and I do know that I didn't spell it out completely, but really is that all you have?

I"m still waiting for you to come back and tell me how GREAT that "article" was... why are you so afraid red?

sniping from the corners. tsk tsk tsk.
 
SaiGirl said:
Since I'm still not allowed to post links here, I recommend that you do a GOOGLE search using the words "WTC7" and "videos".

There are plenty of mainstream media videos of the destruction of WTC7 from several different angles.
They show that the controlled demolition of this 47-story skyscraper is what one usually calls a "self-evident truth".

Note the CBS news broadcast where Dan Rather himself actually states that it "looks exactly" like a typical controlled demolition.

I guess Rather himself felt the visual impression of controlled demolition was self-evident.

Does that make Dan Rather a "paranoid conspiracy" theorist ... along with the millions of others who see this as a typical controlled demolition ?
Click to expand...


Yahoo!!!! run by twoofing.

ready twoof.

It is realllllllly simple. Please demonstrate how this is a "typical controlled demolitions" when there is
1. no sound of explosives
2. no evidence of explosives
3. no seismic evidence of explosives
4. no video evidence of explosives
5. no barotrauma to people nearby due to explosives
6. intact windows withing 50 feet of the collapses

Now if you can show how a controlled demolitions can occur with those 6 things missing... I"D LOVE TO SEE IT.

Please. Pretty please with whipped cream on top show us.
 
RedIbis said:
Since McCain/Palin were never part of the Bush regime, I don't see how you could grant him that.
Click to expand...

I know you don't see it.

That is your failing. Amongst many.

As the democrats are exceedingly happy to point out McCain/Palin were dubbed "GWB lite."

That is EXACTLY what I was inferring.

I'm sorry you missed it.

Inferential reading and reading for comprehension do go together.

I fully understand that.

Unless you are stating that there really was no change in the election of November, and that Barak Obama is "in on it" too. Is that what you are claiming red?
 
SaiGirl said:
Since I'm still not allowed to post links here, I recommend that you do a GOOGLE search using the words "WTC7" and "videos".

There are plenty of mainstream media videos of the destruction of WTC7 from several different angles.
They show that the controlled demolition of this 47-story skyscraper is what one usually calls a "self-evident truth".

Note the CBS news broadcast where Dan Rather himself actually states that it "looks exactly" like a typical controlled demolition.

I guess Rather himself felt the visual impression of controlled demolition was self-evident.

Does that make Dan Rather a "paranoid conspiracy" theorist ... along with the millions of others who see this as a typical controlled demolition ?
Click to expand...

Welcome to the forum.
 
SaiGirl said:
Since I'm still not allowed to post links here, I recommend that you do a GOOGLE search using the words "WTC7" and "videos".

There are plenty of mainstream media videos of the destruction of WTC7 from several different angles.
They show that the controlled demolition of this 47-story skyscraper is what one usually calls a "self-evident truth".

Note the CBS news broadcast where Dan Rather himself actually states that it "looks exactly" like a typical controlled demolition.

I guess Rather himself felt the visual impression of controlled demolition was self-evident.

Does that make Dan Rather a "paranoid conspiracy" theorist ... along with the millions of others who see this as a typical controlled demolition ?
Click to expand...
If you are saying it was a controlled demolition then your ideas are nuts, but if you say it looks like a controlled demolition you are wrong. It does not sound like one, and it was not one. Gravity is the primary energy in a controlled demolition so the building falls down when it fails, the only thing like a controlled demolition; the building fell down.

If you claim WTC7 was a controlled demolition you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist with delusions who uses google as their evidence. Most anti-intellectual.

911 truth thinks the MSM is in on it, so Dan Rather is in on it, you can't use him to support your delusions, he is on the wrong side. 911 truth comes up with dirt dumb ideas, if you believe them where does that leave you? at your computer where you google you way to paranoid nut case ideas with no evidence.
 
Last edited:
walkyrie said:
The george bush regime officials are Running Scared trying to help with coverup about the 911 World Trade Center Controlled Demolition Explosives ,the george bush Attempt to cover up and hide the Controlled Demolition Disintegration Explosives of the WTC with a Faked collapse , was just a poor attempt , and was not enough to hide the WTC Controlled Demolition Disintegration Explosives , only stupid people are swallowing the george bush regime official theory Lies about 9/11, the Truthers are Chasing the goorge bush regime officials
Click to expand...

Only Stupid People Can Swallow the george bush regime official lies about the 9/11 WTC , the controlled demolition Disintegration Explosions that blow up the World Trade Center North ,South and building Seven are becoming harder and harder to hide and cover up , the Nist officials are swetting to find a lie to explain why the building Seven Disintegrated all over suddenly in just about six seconds
 
Last edited:
walkyrie said:
Only Stupid People Can Swallow the george bush regime official lies about the 9/11 WTC , the controlled demolition Disintegration Explosions that blow up the World Trade Center North ,South and building Seven are becoming harder and harder to hide and cover up , the Nist officials are swetting to find a lie to explain why the building Seven Disintegrated all over suddenly in just about six seconds
Click to expand...

'All over suddenly','swetting',did you ever attend a school?
 
walkyrie said:
Only Stupid People Can Swallow the george bush regime official lies about the 9/11 WTC , the controlled demolition Disintegration Explosions
Click to expand...

No only stupid people continue to post word salad without proof. Unless you can provide proof, I will report this as spam.

you keep using words that do not mean what you think they mean.

Please, pretty please provide any example of a "controlled demoliton disintegration explosives" being used any time prior to 9/11.

Please, pretty please provide any example of a "controlled demoliton disintegration explosives" being used on 9/11.

Please, pretty please provide any example of a "controlled demoliton disintegration explosives" being used after 9/11.

I'd love to see an example.

that blow up the World Trade Center North ,South and building Seven are becoming harder and harder to hide and cover up , the Nist officials are swetting to find a lie to explain why the building Seven Disintegrated all over suddenly in just about six seconds
Click to expand...

I love ignorant truthers. Please explain how a building that "disintegrated" managed to strike two buildings which are RIGHT next to it. Including hitting one of the other buildings ON THE FREAKING ROOF?

try again.

ETA: Actually... ONly stupid people would quote themselves, to then state the exact same thing after the quote. IMHO.
 
Last edited:
walkyrie said:
Only Stupid People Can Swallow the george bush regime official lies about the 9/11 WTC , the controlled demolition Disintegration Explosions that blow up the World Trade Center North ,South and building Seven are becoming harder and harder to hide and cover up , the Nist officials are swetting to find a lie to explain why the building Seven Disintegrated all over suddenly in just about six seconds
Click to expand...
Where do you come up with these delusions? Source of your lies?
 
SaiGirl said:
Since I'm still not allowed to post links here, I recommend that you do a GOOGLE search using the words "WTC7" and "videos".

There are plenty of mainstream media videos of the destruction of WTC7 from several different angles.
They show that the controlled demolition of this 47-story skyscraper is what one usually calls a "self-evident truth".

Note the CBS news broadcast where Dan Rather himself actually states that it "looks exactly" like a typical controlled demolition.

I guess Rather himself felt the visual impression of controlled demolition was self-evident.

Does that make Dan Rather a "paranoid conspiracy" theorist ... along with the millions of others who see this as a typical controlled demolition ?
Click to expand...

Exactly Sai Girl,

Since it looked like a controlled demolition then it had to be one. Thats why Dan Rather said it looked like one. I wonder why Dan didn't sign our petition

Now if we had ever seen any regular buildings 50 or 100 story buildings just fall down, then we might have made a different comparison. But the closest thing we have seen just fall down is a Christmas tree when we cut it. So you can see why we think CD is the best bet

We can believe what we want. Just because 99.99% of structural engineers have not signed the ae911truth petition doesn't mean to say that we have to agree with them
 
Telltale Tom said:
Exactly Sai Girl,

Since it looked like a controlled demolition then it had to be one. Thats why Dan Rather said it looked like one. I wonder why Dan didn't sign our petition

Now if we had ever seen any regular buildings 50 or 100 story buildings just fall down, then we might have made a different comparison. But the closest thing we have seen just fall down is a Christmas tree when we cut it. So you can see why we think CD is the best bet

We can believe what we want. Just because 99.99% of structural engineers have not signed the ae911truth petition doesn't mean to say that we have to agree with them
Click to expand...


Well, I've never experienced this TT fella before, but I'm calling "parody/troll."
 
Telltale Tom said:
Exactly Sai Girl,

Since it looked like a controlled demolition then it had to be one. Thats why Dan Rather said it looked like one. I wonder why Dan didn't sign our petition

Now if we had ever seen any regular buildings 50 or 100 story buildings just fall down, then we might have made a different comparison. But the closest thing we have seen just fall down is a Christmas tree when we cut it. So you can see why we think CD is the best bet
Click to expand...

Hit a steel-frame office building built to the same fireproofing codes as WTC with a 140 ton aircraft loaded with gas and then withhold firefighting and it will collapse.

Henry Guthard, engineer and one of [WTC designer] Yamasaki's original partners who also worked as the project manager at the [WTC] site, said, "To hit the building, to disappear, to have pieces come out the other side, it was amazing the building stood. To defend against 5,000 (sic) gallons of ignited fuel in a building of 1350 feet is just not possible.

http://snurl.com/j54gc (Report From Ground Zero page 188)​
Click to expand...
 
RedIbis said:
At the risk of stating the obvious, we have a two term limit for presidents here in the US. They weren't elected OUT of office.
Click to expand...

With 20% approval ratings by the final year I don't think Bush was getting reelected even if he had that option. Low approval ratings and abyssal approval ratings in congress are really bad things for the dominating political party.

walkyrie said:
Only Stupid People Can Swallow the george bush regime official lies about the 9/11 WTC
Click to expand...
George W. Bush did not participate in the engineering procedures dealing with the WTC investigation, fortunately. The job was left to experienced professionals, whos work was validated by other competent professionals and information directly concerned with the building's collapse

And for the rest... disintegration? The hyperboles got old a loooooooooong time ago. :\
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom