Richard Gage Q&A

Well, the other point I was trying to make is that Mr. Gage apparently "lacks funding" to carry out these experiments, yet by their own accounting they cost less than $7,000, while his own salary is many times that. It should be abundantly clear where their priorities lie, pun intended...
 
My two favorite questions are:

1 How did the explosives survive the fire for almost an hour.

2. How come the explosives were at the right level to cause the collapse to start at the area of impact?
 
These latest press conferences were a great opportunity for Richard to answer some of the questions raised in this forum and other places.
I am sure he did.
 
Here are some questions to throw at him:

Mr. Gage, you have 20 years in highrise fire supression, is that correct?

Why are you throwing out those 20 years that you have for a theory that fire wasn't the main cause of the collapse of WTC 1, 2, & 7?

And if your claim is that fire wasn't the main cause, then why are you giving everyone here a claim without physical evidence that the WTCs' were brought down by controlled demolition?

Mr. Gage, do you have any evidence for a controlled demolition in your posession? If not, then why are you here protesting?
 
Last edited:
Telltale Tom said:
These latest press conferences were a great opportunity for Richard to answer some of the questions raised in this forum and other places.
I am sure he did.
Click to expand...

Nobody will ever get to a microphone that Gage doesn't control.
 
Mr Gage,

You said in your debate with explosives expert Ron Craig that the conspirators would have used thermite or thermate because they obviously wouldn't want the explosions to be heard. You said later that the explosives they used had to be "so intense" so they could blast through the building and hurl steel away from it.

How do you explain how an explosive can be both silent and fling steel around at the same time?

 
Last edited:
Seattle_JC said:
Richard Gage will be lecturing in Seattle on 27-June-09 offering “startling visible evidence that what we have been told about 9-11 cannot be true.” His presentation will be followed by a question and answer session.

Because my patience wears thin when dealing with the 9/11 truth movement, I am not entirely sure if I am willing to pay and sit through his webs of contradictions, bad science, and paranoid rhetoric. However, there are other local skeptics that have expressed an interest of going, call them masochists.

If we do end up attending this event, I think the taking advantage of the Q&A is a must here. What are some hardball questions that we can throw at Gage during this session?

I don't expect to change any minds in the audience, the event is presented by 9-11 Truth Seattle, but I would hate to make easy for the guy.

Your collective input is greatly appreciated here,
JC
Click to expand...

Sorry if this has been raised.

Ask him what he does to protect himself from the big evil organization he is uncovering.
 
My question will be when are we going to update our web site to say that the towers fell at 2/3 freefall speed as Richard now says.
We clearly need more funds so that we can have team of people working and updating the technical information on our web site more regularly. You know where to donate.
 
Tweeter said:
Yeah he faked his college degree and took a gamble that the next grand conspiracy would be in his field of work.
Click to expand...

Yeah lol... if only the debunkers could claim as much. They would. They're full of woo.

BTW I know you are long gone from here. But I didn't bump it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom