Merged Plane Crashes Into Building in Austin TX

My heart goes out to the family of the man who flew the plane into the building and those injured or killed. But while reading I was struck by something.

"It felt like a bomb blew off," said Peggy Walker, an IRS revenue officer who was sitting at her desk. "The ceiling caved in and windows blew in. We got up and ran."
Click to expand...

and

Andrew Jacobson, an IRS revenue officer who was on the second floor when the plane hit with a "big whoomp" and then a second explosion,
Click to expand...

secondary explosions.


It was a bomb. See... Just like 9/11. It must have been a bomb. The witnesses even said so (and witnesses are never wrong in trutherland).
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,586781,00.html

Of course our resident truthers won't see the exact same similarities to the statements of the 9/11 witnesses.
 
Last edited:
As of this morning, there was still a cop car parked in front of the guy's house with it's lights flashing, blocking the lane closest to it.
 
Last edited:
aggle-rithm said:
As of this morning, there was still a cop car parked in front of the guy's house with it's lights flashing, blocking the lane closest to it.
Click to expand...

They are waiting for the MIB to get there to confirm he was in a fact a reptile.:covereyes
 
It makes you wonder why people who reach this point don't simply liquidate whatever they can and head to Baja, Majorca, Tahiti, etc.

Pointless, baseless speculation, but the "not a ranter, not a loner" parts of the story make me think that he may have had something physical (e.g., brain tumor, medications) seriously affecting his judgment.

Overall a shame that his life will be reduced to this & his family will have to live with it.
 
scott.in.taiwan said:
This is ridiculous. We already know there are high energy weapons in orbit around the Earth capable of destroying huge buildings like the WTC. If there is no evidence of a plane hitting this building, it must be the work of the Death Star.
Click to expand...

They did just finish bolting on the weapons array to the International Space Station the other day.
 
NTSB transferred investigation to FBI:

http://www.amtonline.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=1&id=10315

And where's the plane?

plane-crash-austin.jpg


See the undamaged lawn by the road? [ETA:] Looks like you can play golf in there.

Smells like inside jobby job.
 
Just drove by it and got a shot with my Iphone. Traffic in that area is still bad and the guy in front of me almost rear ended the car in front of him while he was looking at the damage.
 

Attachments

  • AustinBD.jpg
    AustinBD.jpg
    115.8 KB · Views: 24
A bunch of fire trucks were parked in front of his house today. Aren't they a little late?

There's also a crane, so they're probably planning on demolishing what's left of it.
 
Infoexcavator said:
The CT-point is that the HAZMAT fire engine was there waiting for the plane to hit.
Click to expand...

prove it. did you contact the firefighters who were parked there to find out why and for how long they were there?

i didn't think so.

no evidence=no truth.

no ticky=no shirty.
 
parky76 said:
prove it. did you contact the firefighters who were parked there to find out why and for how long they were there?

i didn't think so.

no evidence=no truth.

no ticky=no shirty.
Click to expand...

Did you even watch the video? It was some girl being interviewed by a reporter. I am not that girl, I was merely informing what the conspiracy theories are saying. I absolutely did not make a claim that there was something there, I was explaining to Redtail that the conspiracy theory says that the hazmat was there before the crash instead of just arriving later. Do I really have to add ridicule or disclaimers after every post so that people don't demand me to prove something crazy that I am linking to when my intent is to just inform the posters what actual conspiracy theorists are saying? A big problem with this forum is that many posters have absolute hatred towards conspiracy theorists, I know conspiracy theorists are dangerous and more importantly wrong, but I feel like I should be able to defend them without being accused of being one.

Here, I post it again, jump to 2:55. Thats the "evidence" I was linking to. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gItV-ENkxPY.

Let me explain this to you:

ericverducci posts: "Now the CTs are claiming that the witness "Megan Riley" proves it was an inside job because she claims she saw a fire truck doing "something with HAZMAT." This is likely going to become a huge piece of "evidence" for the CTs so we'll need to know how to respond to it. I have no idea how to."

Redtail replies to previous: "HAZMAT showing up at a fuel fire isn't really odd..."

I reply to Redtail: "The CT-point is that the HAZMAT fire engine was there waiting for the plane to hit. http://www.infowars.com/eyewitness-h...e-plane-crash/"

Redtail replies to me: "Ah I see. I wonder if any of them will think to ask the fire dept what they were doing at the time."

I DID NOT CLAIM IT WAS A CONSPIRACY! I just posted a clarification to the ericverducci posting and linked to a conspiracy site, do you understand now? I did not make any claims that I need to prove because I did not claim anything.

I guess this post is finished, I edited it almost as much as Joe Stack edited his message, sorry about that but I am a rambler.
 
Last edited:
A woo minded facebook friend posted this:
Did the law of physics change again yesterday? No one told me! (Austin Texas)
Click to expand...


I can't even begin speculate wtf that means...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom