Split Thread Judy Wood and dustification

My response is in bold.

jammonius said:
It has been clearly established that NIST did not investigate the actual destruction of the WTC complex. Posters here may not like to admit that, but they do admit it, nonetheless.

You've never read it.


Posters here are adamant in their opposition to the DEW explanation but refuse, utterly, to investigate the nature and the extent of the involvement of SAIC and of ARA with such

We can't help you with your ignorance of physics.

Posters here have no curiosity whatsoever about the Directed Energy Professional Society, let alone DEPS' rather extensive libary of DEW information and links to the cream of the military-industrial-complex.

I know more about DEW than you can imagine and I defer to the likes of Mackey for advanced information.


Posters here are ignorant of Dwight David Eisenhower's admonition to beware of the MIC.

Eisenhower was right but what does that have with the state of physics in this decade? We've all heard the speech. It's one of the great speeches. If anyone needs a refresher, here it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY


Posters here will not even avail themselves of the public resources of the US Directed Energy Directorate, located at Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque or its affiliate branches at Wright Patterson AFB and at other locations.

Why don't you do it for us?

Big Al has requested a link to the excerpt from Dr. Moline and I am pleased to provide that:

http://www.onearth.org/node/1719

I do not expect Big Al to mention the assertion that the possibility that DEW destroyed the WTC to Dr. Moline,

You make the call. You are putting thoughts in her head that have no basis in what we know she said or in reality.

That page has this link. It's all about how dust and breathing is what is causing the health problems of the first responders.
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/sept11/features/9875/index1.html#ixzz0Z4fe6Ccc

You left out the bit about toxins in her statement. Toxins have nothing to do with directed energy beams. That's called cherry picking.


So, posters, the votes have been tabulated. No one here has the foggiest clue what destroyed the WTC and no officially determined, valid investigatory outcome they can point to that provides one iota of information as to what destroyed the WTC complex.

the NIST study is official whether you like it or agree with it or not.

But, posters here know it wasn't DEW and everyone has confirmed how sane they are and how content they are with not knowing what destroyed the WTC, to boot.

You continue to demonstrate your ignorance of basic physics.

Have I described the existing state of bliss, posters?
Click to expand...

You seem to be alone on t his. See my call for Woods and/or AE911Turth to demonstrate dustification in the labs on any small bit of steel and publish the results. It's a new thread.
 
Last edited:
jammonius said:
It has been clearly established that NIST did not investigate the actual destruction of the WTC complex. Posters here may not like to admit that, but they do admit it, nonetheless.

Posters here are adamant in their opposition to the DEW explanation but refuse, utterly, to investigate the nature and the extent of the involvement of SAIC and of ARA with such weapons.

Posters here have no curiosity whatsoever about the Directed Energy Professional Society, let alone DEPS' rather extensive libary of DEW information and links to the cream of the military-industrial-complex.

Posters here are ignorant of Dwight David Eisenhower's admonition to beware of the MIC.

Posters here will not even avail themselves of the public resources of the US Directed Energy Directorate, located at Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque or its affiliate branches at Wright Patterson AFB and at other locations.

Big Al has requested a link to the excerpt from Dr. Moline and I am pleased to provide that:

http://www.onearth.org/node/1719

I do not expect Big Al to mention the assertion that the possibility that DEW destroyed the WTC to Dr. Moline, because Big Al wants to be thought of as normal and natural, so it's alright with him if physicians remain baffled by the illness etiologies they are seeing.

So, posters, the votes have been tabulated. No one here has the foggiest clue what destroyed the WTC and no officially determined, valid investigatory outcome they can point to that provides one iota of information as to what destroyed the WTC complex.

But, posters here know it wasn't DEW and everyone has confirmed how sane they are and how content they are with not knowing what destroyed the WTC, to boot.

Have I described the existing state of bliss, posters?
Click to expand...

I admit, that you're totally insane & seriously need to take your medication for severe paranoia!

Directed Energy Weapons from space is purely Science Fiction!

What destroyed the WTCs': Commerical airliners causing damage to the outter columns & inner core, jet fuel fires induced other fires which spread from other fuel sources inside the office building, heat from the fires caused the steel supports to sag & buckle & gravity induced global collapse of a tube within a tube structure.

And you're a lunatic for believeing in Sci-Fi based weapons! I'm a Wookie & I know that what you spew is Banta Poodoo!
 
Last edited:
jay howard said:
The claims I'm defending are testable, verifiable claims.

DEW's and "no-planers" have no testable theories. They are therefore, outside the realm of the scientific.

Show me a testable claim and I'll show you a scientific theory. It may be an incorrect scientific theory, but a scientific one nonetheless.

Do you understand the difference? If you know a damned thing about what science is, you'd better.
Click to expand...

Hey pot... it is the kettle calling.

This is the same person who is trying (and failing) to hold up a "paper" with 20 methodological errors which call into question all of the findings, conclusions and even their very data.

try again.

Show me a properly tested claim from any truther... especially your wackiness of nanothermite (which S. Jones has backed away from... go figure)
 
triforcharity said:
That looks like a guy covered with dust, possibly having a hard time breathing due to some inhaled occlusion, and possibly been crying about the fact that he just escaped with his life, and maybe even seen some of his dead friends' bodies. Who the **** knows.

What I do know, is it's not from a DEW, that is for damn certain!
Click to expand...

But it is now clear that we need a new and independent investigation isn't it Al ?
 
bill smith said:
But it is now clear that we need a new and independent investigation isn't it Al ?
Click to expand...

You know Bill, maybe there should be a new & independent investigation to see if there's any connections between the Truth Movement & Al Qaida. Wouldn't you agree?

BTW: Calling Truthers anti-semetics is really fair & balanced! Truthers blame the Jewish community for 9/11, therefore they should be called anti-semetics in a respectful way.

Learn to deal with it Truthers! Good lord!
 
Last edited:
Who built the orbital DEW?

Who funded it's research and construction?

Who put it into orbit?

What was it's purpose?

Who operates it today?

Why haven't any astronomers seen the damned thing?
 
jammonius, don't you have any empathy for Judy Wood other than just accepting the crazy stories she spins? She's been fired from her job. She can't get another job anywhere. Pretty much every professional in her field has some impression she's mentally ill. How she will support herself remains a mystery to me, although I would like to know. Fighting with us here on JREF won't do anything for the fact that she is unable to make an income now. What do you think is going on with your one-man war to win respect for Dr. Wood?
 
jammonius said:
It has been clearly established that NIST did not investigate the actual destruction of the WTC complex. Posters here may not like to admit that, but they do admit it, nonetheless.
Click to expand...

NIST investigated the CAUSE of the destruction. They also ruled out several alternative theories, which I assume is the reason you think the investigation should have continued on to the dynamics of the collapse itself.

Taxpayer dollars are limited. If you want a chaotic, nondeterministic and irrelevant process investigated, then YOU pony up the cash.
 
jammonius said:
So, posters, the votes have been tabulated. No one here has the foggiest clue what destroyed the WTC and no officially determined, valid investigatory outcome they can point to that provides one iota of information as to what destroyed the WTC complex.
Click to expand...

What votes? Did you conduct a poll??

What destroyed the WTC? Hmmmm, lets see... two jumbo jets smashing into two buildings, maybe?? Sounds pretty adequate to me!!

I guess now that Richard Gage has lost his thermate debate, maybe you Truthers should listen to Judy Wood's dustification debate?? Talk about playing Whack-a-mole!!
 
dus-tif-i-ca-tion
dus-tif-i-ca-yay-tion
it's making me wait.
it's keeping me way ay ay ay ting
 
Travis said:
Who built the orbital DEW?

Who funded it's research and construction?

Who put it into orbit?

What was it's purpose?

Who operates it today?

Why haven't any astronomers seen the damned thing?
Click to expand...

A million amateur astronomers world wide are all dues-paying members of the NWO.
 
BigAl said:
A million amateur astronomers world wide are all dues-paying members of the NWO.
Click to expand...


Right, that's why purchasing a 10-inch or larger telescope (anywhere in the world) requires a background check.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Travis said:
Who built the orbital DEW?
Click to expand...
THEY built it.

Who funded it's research and construction?
Click to expand...
The Jews.

Who put it into orbit?
Click to expand...
The New World Order.

What was it's purpose?
Click to expand...
To kill 90% of all humans and enslave the rest.

Who operates it today?
Click to expand...
The Mossad and the CIA.

Why haven't any astronomers seen the damned thing?
Click to expand...
They're all funded by The Government, and have been paid off/threatened/blackmailed by The Government.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Man, it's easy being a truther!
 
Last edited:
Alferd_Packer said:
What form of energy will "dustify" steel?
Click to expand...


Greetings Alferd Packer

Your 7 word question remains unanswered by any authorized investigation as it relates to the destruction of the WTC complex. Dr. Wood has answered it -- DEW -- and has vetted that answer via NIST, via the US Directed Energy Directorate and tried to put SAIC and ARA on the spot, via legal process, to get them to answer it.

No one here seems much interested in following those leads;

SAIC
ARA
DEPS
DED

But, just as your question was concise, so to is the answer. It is set forth within the above acrynyms.

As the board now has its answer to the quintessential question, I will sign off here. It has been a useful endeavor. Your question obviously entails understanding that a presumed smack from a jetliner, a bit of kerosene (about enough to fill an average size backyard swimming pool) and office content did not amount to sufficient energy to do this:

Image190.jpg

There are no steel beams where one would assume hundreds or thousands should be; but there is dust.



Show the above picture and ask your question at

SAIC
ARA
DEPS
DED

bye for now
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom