• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AE911Truth Watch

3000? That venues largest room holds less than 300.

Yes, I've been there before for a wedding reception.
 
3000? That venues largest room holds less than 300.

Yes, I've been there before for a wedding reception.

I have just seen a major problem with the invitation, that might keep the numbers down.

The invitation to the Keynote Luncheon and the A/E conference is only open to signers of the petition. So that means that from the whole of California we are only going to get 51 licensed architects and 3 licensed Structural Engineers. Thats a mistake in my book. We need it to be open to any architect or engineer so that Richard can convince them of CD like he does with more than 95% of people he speaks to.

I hope we can convince ae911truth to change the policy, because I am not sure why we are inviting 3,000 architects from SF if they need to sign the petition before they hear the story.
 
I have just seen a major problem with the invitation, that might keep the numbers down.

The invitation to the Keynote Luncheon and the A/E conference is only open to signers of the petition.

Anything to keep the people with real questions out.

Who's going to control the Q&A microphone? Will there be Q&A?

So that means that from the whole of California we are only going to get 51 licensed architects and 3 licensed Structural Engineers. Thats a mistake in my book. We need it to be open to any architect or engineer so that Richard can convince them of CD like he does with more than 95% of people he speaks to.

I hope we can convince ae911truth to change the policy, because I am not sure why we are inviting 3,000 architects from SF if they need to sign the petition before they hear the story.

I keep telling you that you are high on your count of structural engineers. Google is your friend.

The AE911 bios that I have checked have been lies, also.
 
Anything to keep the people with real questions out.

Who's going to control the Q&A microphone? Will there be Q&A?



I keep telling you that you are high on your count of structural engineers. Google is your friend.

The AE911 bios that I have checked have been lies, also.

Big Al, you need to cut us some slack here.

When I last looked we had 80 structural, civil, geo, sewage engineers from across the US and most of these signed up in the first few months We might have jazzed the numbers up a bit but does it really matter. You need to put it in perspective.
For instance last year there were 320 new PE's registered in the State of Maine and sadly we registered less than 10 new PE's from across the States

So just let us jazz the numbers up a bit and if you have any specific claims that we have made the names up then I will help ae911truth to sort these out

It is significant and slightly dissappointing that we only have 3SE's in California. But there is great growth potential
 
Anything to keep the people with real questions out.

Who's going to control the Q&A microphone? Will there be Q&A?

.

I've been to Gages show and all questions are screened before you are allowed to touch the microphone. Anyone that is likely to ask an "inconvenient" question never gets anywhere near the microphone (they know who their "detractors" are). You can talk to him after the show but you won't be able to have your questions addressed in front of the audience (unless the question is in support of his views).
 
Big Al, you need to cut us some slack here.

Why? Checking credentials isn't rocked science.

Inflating a biography is intelectual fraud.


When I last looked we had 80 structural, civil, geo, sewage engineers from across the US and most of these signed up in the first few months We might have jazzed the numbers up a bit but does it really matter. You need to put it in perspective.
For instance last year there were 320 new PE's registered in the State of Maine and sadly we registered less than 10 new PE's from across the States

Do you really have "sewage engineers"? What do you thing the education requirements for a sewage engineers is? I have no idea. Why do you think that a "sewage engineer" has anything relevant to say about why fire caused a tower to collapse?

I see people in your lists using "SE" for "software engineer" and since this is the industry I've spent most of my life in, I know that damn few software engineers have any expertise relevant to what AE911 is looking for.



So just let us jazz the numbers up a bit and if you have any specific claims that we have made the names up then I will help ae911truth to sort these out

It is significant and slightly dissappointing that we only have 3SE's in California. But there is great growth potential

Google those names. One of them is in the software industry and has no apparent expertise in structures.


The reason you have so few engineers is that the claims Gage makes are ******** and engineers that are not senile know it.

Edited to remove breach of Rule 10.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Locknar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The nice thing about having such few members is that we get some really good proportional representations. So on Friday's mega press conference I expect that we will get 1 or 2 of our california SE's to attend, that would be 33% or 66%.

You will see that we raised all the money to invite 3,000 architects. Did anyone you know get an invite? Its going to be blast.!
 
The nice thing about having such few members is that we get some really good proportional representations. So on Friday's mega press conference I expect that we will get 1 or 2 of our california SE's to attend, that would be 33% or 66%.

You will see that we raised all the money to invite 3,000 architects. Did anyone you know get an invite? Its going to be blast.!


How pathetic can you get? First a total amateur argues with somebody who designs high rises for a living, now he tries to show that miniscule membership is somehow an advantage in spreading the word about 9/11 Truth.
 
Last edited:
The nice thing about having such few members is that we get some really good proportional representations. So on Friday's mega press conference I expect that we will get 1 or 2 of our california SE's to attend, that would be 33% or 66%.

You will see that we raised all the money to invite 3,000 architects. Did anyone you know get an invite? Its going to be blast.!

Why don't you invite engineers?
 
Bigal and Dudalb.


It is Poes Law. I think tell tale tom is great by showing exactly how little support is out there. Keep it up tom, I'm sure eventually there will be 1,000 licensed and registered architects or engineers.... One day.
 
Holy Bump Batman!

I took a quick look at the gageland once again, to pass time. Found an interesting post of theirs, though.

A post in which they introduce their volunteer teams.

Currently they have a whopping 17 different volunteer teams:

The Action Groups Team
The College Outreach Team
The Congressional Outreach Team
The Fundraising Team
The Graphics Team
The Media Outreach Team
The NIST Pursuit Team
The Online Store Team
The Presenter Team
The Public Access TV Team
The Public Outreach Team
The Video Team
The Verification Team
The Volunteer Team

The Front-End Web Team
The Back-End Web Team
The Writing Team


As you can see from the team names, and even better when reading the team descriptions, this is a pure sales organization (as we already know).

Where are the ones you would expect from a credible organization, like a scientific research team, the physics team, the review team? There are none. Instead they have a specific team for "developing methods of holding NIST accountable for their false, misleading, and unscientific 9/11 reports"

They also have profiles of a couple of volunteers. They all present classic symptoms of truth activists (feeling of great importance, life changing experiences, wanting to be part of something meaningful and bringing the truth to everyone):

I was so inspired by what I'd heard that day that I knew I wanted to be part of bringing 9/11 truth to the public,” Selk explained. “The personal connections I've made since becoming a volunteer have forever changed my life, and I am grateful to those who pour their hearts into this critically important work.”

“I consider my volunteering for AE911Truth to be some of the most important work I've ever done

“The events of 9/11 changed everything, and it was too important NOT to do something about it

“What I like most about volunteering is that I’m doing something constructive for the cause of truth and justice,” Cook said. “While some people in the movement get discouraged and frustrated, being a part of AE911Truth allows me to contribute on an ongoing basis in ways that have a positive effect on the world.”

That's why it's so hard to make these people abandon trutherism with reason and facts.
 
Last edited:
A post in which they introduce their volunteer teams.

Currently they have a whopping 17 different volunteer teams:

The Action Groups Team
The College Outreach Team
The Congressional Outreach Team
The Fundraising Team
The Graphics Team
The Media Outreach Team
The NIST Pursuit Team
The Online Store Team
The Presenter Team
The Public Access TV Team
The Public Outreach Team
The Video Team
The Verification Team
The Volunteer TeamThe Front-End Web Team
The Back-End Web Team
The Writing Team


A volunteer team name the "Volunteer Team"? :boggled: And the entire purpose of this team is to place new volunteers into one of the other volunteer teams? :boggled: How do they get volunteers for the Volunteer Team, then? :boggled:
 
I doubt those teams do much work. I sent an email to the Congressional Outreach Team asking which congresspersons they'd contacted. No reply.
 
I doubt those teams do much work. I sent an email to the Congressional Outreach Team asking which congresspersons they'd contacted. No reply.

Those emails addresses are probably just honey pots so Gage can sell email addy's to Nigerian bank scammers... That's actually a lot less disgusting than making a living trampling the graves of those lost.
 

Back
Top Bottom