Split Thread Judy Wood and dustification

[bill smith]

Why don't the debunkers start a new thread on Dr.Judy Woods and we can REALLY test her case. Bring all your frends.

 

[bill smith]

Hey bill,

We should be honored. They're coming out of the woodworks (no pun intended!). We must be hitting a raw nerve or something. I guess they realize Jenkins and Mackey won't do.

Well, bill, new challengers are welcome!

Bring it on, posters

Yes I have often brought Dr. Wood uo simply to watch the scurrying begin. It never fails. lol

PS. I often thought that Jesse Ventura needs a new conspiracy for his show. With that in mind....

http://boards.trutv.com/showthread.php?p=37574&posted=1#post37574

 

[Scott Sommers]

Why don't the debunkers start a new thread on Dr.Judy Woods and we can REALLY test her case. Bring all your frends.

Bill, Bill, Bill, this is so kind of you to give a hand to our friend jammonius. In fact, the appeal to Judy Wood is one of the most pathetic things I've seen here. She is unemployed and umployable. There is no school that will give her a job and there is no university faculty association that will assert her right to employment. She is a certificable nut.

What has Dr. Judy said that can be tested? Perhaps you can help us here by suggesting testable statements that can be derived from Dr. Judy's website. As far as I can tell, she's said nothing more testable than my deep seated beliefe that it was secret ninja building demolition teams responsible for the WTC collapse. She has some vague suggestions.

When you or jammonius can actually tell us something she's said other than 'the death star sis it', maybe someone here can deal with it. Until the.....

 

[beachnut]

You waited two years for you second post?

Seeya in 2012.

That is your neoNAZI rebuttal? Wowzer, you guys really pour on the facts and evidence. Wow!

What next, you will post some moronic missile junk again after 2 years of total failure, and 8 years unable to figure out 911?

Do you have the energy requirements for the Judy's beam weapon? No, you don't do math, it is not a skill in your neoNAZI bag of failed moronic delusions. But nice post, clean, and full of all the evidence you have on 911.

How much energy does the weapon require MaGZ?

 

[beachnut]

What's just as curious is they don't seem to realize their posts reflect solely upon them, and have nothing whatever to do with Dr. Wood's comprehensive scientific work. It's as if they don't realize the joke's on them.

Thanks for your post.

You expose your ignorance on the subject when you support the insane work of Dr Wood's. The joke is Judy.

The WTC tower pile was 5 to 7 stories high, you failed twice, supporting Judy, and spewing moronic lies about 911. Double failure for the weekend.

 

[bill smith]

Bill, Bill, Bill, this is so kind of you to give a hand to our friend jammonius. In fact, the appeal to Judy Wood is one of the most pathetic things I've seen here. She is unemployed and umployable. There is no school that will give her a job and there is no university faculty association that will assert her right to employment. She is a certificable nut.

What has Dr. Judy said that can be tested? Perhaps you can help us here by suggesting testable statements that can be derived from Dr. Judy's website. As far as I can tell, she's said nothing more testable than my deep seated beliefe that it was secret ninja building demolition teams responsible for the WTC collapse. She has some vague suggestions.

When you or jammonius can actually tell us something she's said other than 'the death star sis it', maybe someone here can deal with it. Until the.....

Are you sure it wasn't sooper-dooper nanothermite that caused the inside jobby-job ? lol

 

[MaGZ]

I rarely feeling like jumping into this stuff MAGz, but I registered here so I could see all the posts from various topics including AAH. I'll start posting a lot more on subjects i'm familiar with if it'll make you happy. This topic is one of the funnier ones. I also like the remote control planes theory also, having actually worked on remote control sytems for naval aircraft (The ACLS system to be specific) back in my navy days.

My post still stands though. I'm quite familiar with space based power systems since i've been working on them for the past 18 years (basically the entire main bus of the spacecraft and it's battery systems) as well as spacecraft avionics and some of the propulsion system electronics on both government and commercial spacecraft. Anybody who thinks this stuff is possible doesn't know the first thing about the subject.

Is it possible to gather solar energy from space and microwave it back to earth? Economically feasible?

 

[beachnut]

... the near instantaneous pulverization of steel and of concrete, the turning of steel beams to dust as they fall, is the result of a kerosene based fire.

...
Whether they are compelled by their consciences to do something about it remains to be seen.

... USA DID NOT do a valid or definitive investigation of what happened on 9/11/01, hence there is no authroritative finding that anyone can turn to resolve the quesiton of what happned on 9/11/01.

blessings

pulverization of steel? lol, are you this ignorant on science? No steel beams turned to dust on 911. And to say so is pure insanity.

Unless you have some science to back up your moronic delusion. Can you supply the math for your claims? Got any evidence beside your idiotic statements on justified steel.

 

[funk de fino]

But, there was a thread that I seem to recall that dealt with the issue of DEBRIS HEIGHT at Ground Zero. As I recall it, that thread caused, shall we say, quite a stir around here. For my part, suffice it to say, the evidence in support of the claim ground zero was flattened, thus confirming, among other things, that the steel had been pulverized and turned to dust, was rather overwhelming.

Thats a bare faced and flagrant lie.

 

[The Big Dog]

This one's pretty interesting because it reveals that the iconic one, shot from an angle and looking up makes it seem as if there's height when, in reality, there was none. You remember that iconic photo that tried to give the impression (false) of height don't you? Or, do you want me to post it up next to the one shown above, showing gz was flat as a pancake?

Wow! That is the type of high quality thinking that is shown only in such rarefied thinks tanks like the flat earth society! The Earth is also flat as pancake! No wonder you attract savants like Bill

Wait until I show you a picture of Everest from K2! It ain't so freaking tall!

The Himalayas are also an inside jobby job!

 

[bill smith]

pulverization of steel? lol, are you this ignorant on science? No steel beams turned to dust on 911. And to say so is pure insanity.

Unless you have some science to back up your moronic delusion.

You know when they test the airframe of an aircraft on that machine Boeing call 'the Big Shaker' ? It cycles the airframe through up to 2,000 cycles a second. Would the frame turn to dust if the frame (and it's molecules) could be vibrated at (say) 1 million cycles per second ?

On another subject. How does a microwave work ? Is it true that it vibrates the molecules of the food together causing them to create heat by friction ?

Suppose the space-based Directed energy microwave energy system could be powered by harnessing the billon watts of the HAARP stations on Earth ?


See where I'm going with this ?

 

[MaGZ]

That is your neoNAZI rebuttal? Wowzer, you guys really pour on the facts and evidence. Wow!

What next, you will post some moronic missile junk again after 2 years of total failure, and 8 years unable to figure out 911?

Do you have the energy requirements for the Judy's beam weapon? No, you don't do math, it is not a skill in your neoNAZI bag of failed moronic delusions. But nice post, clean, and full of all the evidence you have on 911.

How much energy does the weapon require MaGZ?

This is my theory on 9/11 and it does not have anything to do with energy beams. As you can see I do have 9/11 figured out.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=166811

 

[Rocket_Scientist]

Why don't the debunkers start a new thread on Dr.Judy Woods and we can REALLY test her case. Bring all your frends.

Bill, there is no "case" to test. Woods won't even state what KIND of weapon was even used much less the power requirements for it. I can tell you right now that even the largest government birds only provide the smallest fraction of the power required to even damage, much less "dustify" WTC columns.

I think it was Mackey who did the calcs, and even if we could build some super duper gi-gan-toe death ray from space, we (as in the entire human race) wouldn't have a launch vehicle big enough to put it there. There's only so many suppliers of launch vehicles to the government (my company included) and something that large DOES NOT EXIST.

If the technology and the launch capabilities don't and can't exist then none of the "DEW" theories have any merit.

 

[beachnut]

You know when they test the airframe of an aircraft on that machine Boeing call 'the Big Shaker' ? It cycles the airframe through up to 2,000 cycles a second. Would the frame turn to dust if the frame (and it's molecules) could be vibrated at (say) 1 million cycles per second ?

On another subject. How does a microwave work ? Is it true that it vibrates the molecules of the food together causing them to create heat by friction ?

Suppose the space-based Directed energy microwave energy system could be powered by harnessing the billon watts of the HAARP stations on Earth ?


See where I'm going with this ?

Boeing is going to dustify steel? Where do you come up with these stupid statements? Very stupid.

What did your microwave do with steel items? Any clue? Don't start a fire.

HAARP with the massive power of a residential street block will do what? So HAARP is like 3,000 microwave ovens. What will you do with 3,000 microwave ovens? You could heat up 3,000 cups of hot coffee and give out about 13 to 14 cups of hot coffee to each floor of the WTC, and do it every minute. Wowzer, you and Judy have the same insane ideas, or did you repeat Judy's insane ideas by mistake?


Yes I see you support idiotic insane ideas on 911 and you can't do the math or get the facts right.
And as usual you are so far off topic I can report your moronic posts as such. Is there an idea too dirt dumb for you to not post? no

The photos prove you are wrong as if you cared about 911 as you spew lies to apologize for terrorists out of ignorance.

 

[MaGZ]

Why would anyone here worry about the claims of Judy Woods? Does she have any following? Why be concern with anything she claims about 9/11?

 

[bill smith]

Bill, there is no "case" to test. Woods won't even state what KIND of weapon was even used much less the power requirements for it. I can tell you right now that even the largest government birds only provide the smallest fraction of the power required to even damage, much less "dustify" WTC columns.

I think it was Mackey who did the calcs, and even if we could build some super duper gi-gan-toe death ray from space, we (as in the entire human race) wouldn't have a launch vehicle big enough to put it there. There's only so many suppliers of launch vehicles to the government (my company included) and something that large DOES NOT EXIST.

If the technology and the launch capabilities don't and can't exist then none of the "DEW" theories have any merit.

If the physical and other characteristics of the 'collapses' do not match the government theory then that has no merit either. So you dig for your new explanation and we will dig for ours and we will see who comes up with the best one. Deal ?

 

[The Big Dog]

Why would anyone here worry about the claims of Judy Woods? Does she have any following? Why be concern with anything she claims about 9/11?

Uh oh! Truther fight.

Remember when Ace totally lost his **** when Judy started running around behind his back with "the Hutchinson Effect"?

Fantastic.

 

[The Big Dog]

If the physical and other characteristics of the 'collapses' do not match the government theory then that has no merit either. So you dig for your new explanation and we will dig for ours and we will see who comes up with the best one. Deal ?

DEAL! Say Bill, please explain how the evil inside jobby jobbers used the power of Hurricane Erin to power the Hutchinson effect which in turn was used somehow to power some kind of weapon.

Anyhow, if you could simply translate Judy Wood bat **** crazy into something less crazy, that would work too.

kthxbye

 

[A W Smith]

Balonyness:

The height of the WTC towers was 1450 feet. 110 stories of 4 inch slabs equals 36.6666 feet. Thats assuming they survive intact and are not pulverized during 110 collisions and dispersed as dust through lower Manhattan, and also not driven into a seventy foot deep basement.

Your "flat" debris pile?
Debunked

 

[bill smith]

DEAL! Say Bill, please explain how the evil in/side jobby jobbers used the power of urricane Erin to power the Hutchinson effect which in turn was used somehow to power some kind of weapon.

Anyhow, if you could simply translate Judy Wood bat **** crazy into something less crazy, that would work too.

kthxbye

You mean the gant hurricane that was off the New York coast on 9/11 ? The one they say was weakening ? maybe somebody can post a photo ? What a BIGGIE eh ? Still, it didn't appear on the weathermaps of the TV stations that morning and was not even mentioned. Though it was a few hundred miles away at the time and was only slightly bigger than Katrina.

Funnily enough the crew of the Space Station that passed overhead and must have had a terrific view of it didn't mention it either. Though they did say that they could see the smoke of the Towers and all the rest..

Is that the Hurricane you mean ?

Perhaps they did use the field effects that are known to accompany hurricanes to influence the collapse of the towers but I haven't really looked into that yet.

Will somebody post a nice big picture of the Hurricane Erin off the New York coast on 9/11 ? I cannot post big pictures on the jref.