Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...

Official NWO Internal Memorandum, circa 1963: For future reference, when assassinating heads of states, do not exceed a shooter-to-patsy ratio greater than 1:0. Glue-sniffing X-Files fans may notice the discrepency and shoot in their pants.
Addendum: Should a 1:1 patsy:shooter ratio be needed, do not have the shooter firing from the completely opposite direction as the patsy.
 
Are you seriously telling me that you can prove that a shot from the rear could make a skull go forward, stop and then thrash backward violently as if the shot came from the front? You cannot because it's impossible. If you can make that happen, go for it.;)
I don't know if anyone here has mentioned it, but Kennedy wore a back brace. It was physically impossible for him to bend over, or duck, or twist in reaction to the first bullet. And the first bullet wound was not a fatal injury. Some have argued that if not for the back brace making him a sitting duck for the follow-up shots he may well have survived the assasination attempt.
 
Last edited:
Now, there's a few moments there between the sound of the shots and the victim realizing she'd been shot. Why would this be any different in Connally's case?

'cause 7forever can see, in the Zapruder film, Connally swatting at the bullet as it whizzed past his head. We have big, fast mosquitoes in Dallas and Connally was used to swatting at them.
 
I believe the early witnesses and obviously his head and body slamming backward from a frontal shot.

WallPaint253.jpg

WallPaint199.jpg
If he was shot from the front why is all that blood and brains getting blown towards the front?
 
Nah. He's just brewing the mother of all personal incredulities.

Wait for it.....
 
My guess is that he's crying for help on some other intertubes forum. "WAH! The meanies at JREF don't believe me!!!"
 
Google tells me that he is posting stuff all over, but I'm not willing to look for the whining. Especially given some of the links to prisonplanet and stormfront.
 
The Pristine bullet? Everyone knows what pristine means right? Anyone who claims the so-called magic bullet was pristine or anywhere near pristine is a few cans short of a 6-pack. They are also lying to themselves and to anyone who listens to them.

Notpristine.jpg


Get the picture 7forever?

Ranb
 
Photographic proof of bullet hole in windshield

From Doug Weldon's research, they tried many times to create a crack in the same place the bullet hole was. I had to see them side by side first. The crack is more right of the bullet hole seen in altgens 255 pic. Notice the clear white defect below the mirror is missing in the windshield replacement. This is supporting evidence they created the crack where the bullet hole was.

CE350.gif

WallPaint266.jpg

269.gif

WallPaint264.jpg
 
Please don't tell me pictures two and four above are photos of photos on computers? Nice to have clear evidence to work with...

The original is here (Big pic warning) but no idea what it's supposed to prove.
 
Last edited:
In fact i'm not sure i can make any sense of anything 7forever has said in the post above.
 
From Doug Weldon's research, they tried many times to create a crack in the same place the bullet hole was. I had to see them side by side first. The crack is more right of the bullet hole seen in altgens 255 pic. Notice the clear white defect below the mirror is missing in the windshield replacement. This is supporting evidence they created the crack where the bullet hole was.
Those grainy photos you posted are the only versions I can find of this photo with the streaks showing across the windshield. I don't think they're really there in the original. Here are others:

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/images/Altgens.jpg
http://www.kenrahn.com/Marsh/Photos/Altgens6.gif
http://media.photobucket.com/image/altgens/JosiahThompson/Windshield/Altgens6extremeclose-up.jpg

Also, that white spot appears to be a reflection and not a defect in the windshield. You're taking artifacts from scanned images and seeing what you want to see in those artifacts.

It's clear that at the time of this photo, a) Kennedy had already been shot in the neck, and b) it was still a pristine windshield.

I know how you must feel - a really beautiful hypothesis, shot down by a bunch of ugly facts.
 
Given that the last photo of the computer screen shows the photoshop toolbar, it's silly to try and 'prove' anything with these photos.
 
Ah. Right now i've seen clearer copies i see what the picture shows... Huh. Never seen that before...
 

Back
Top Bottom