Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...

What do I see? He gets shot in the right front of the head.LOL That gif you posted is not the way you do it. You drag it back and forth and it's easily seen that the back of his head never moves forward. It not hard at all. His head was down before the frontal shot, therefore after it connected with his head, it went up before it went back.
 
Last edited:
I admit, the gif could fool alot of people into believing what you're pushing but his head never moved forward.
 
EventHorizon said:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jbchit.htm

Of course he's reacting to a bullet. He's just been hit. As has JFK. Congratulations, you've just argued that the single bullet theory is correct. Well done.
Click to expand...

I see. He's swatting at the bullet that entered his back that passed the left side of his head...brilliant. A jury would conclude with Connally's testimony, corroborative evidence and the great film that the men were hit by seperate bullets in less than a second of each other.;)
 
7forever said:
I see. He's swatting at the bullet that entered his back that passed the left side of his head...brilliant. A jury would conclude with Connally's testimony, corroborative evidence and the great film that the men were hit by seperate bullets in less than a second of each other.;)
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? I honestly have no idea what you are trying to say.
 
You guys are all talking to yourselves...:eye-poppi

His head never moves forward and anyone who looks at it enough times would conclude the same.
 
7forever said:
What do I see? He gets shot in the right front of the head.LOL That gif you posted is not the way you do it. You drag it back and forth and it's easily seen that the back of his head never moves forward. It not hard at all. His head was down before the frontal shot, therefore after it connected with his head, it went up before it went back.
Click to expand...

7forever said:
I admit, the gif could fool alot of people into believing what you're pushing but his head never moved forward.
Click to expand...

Fine. This answers my question.
 
7forever said:
I admit, the gif could fool alot of people into believing what you're pushing but his head never moved forward.
Click to expand...
The GIF is just a zoom-in of two of the frames of the Zapruder film, with a few reference lines added. Why is that fooling people? It's obvious to anyone who sees that, that his head moves forward when it got hit.

You even admit that it this view shows it. But you don't accept it because it conflicts with what your preconceived notions were.

The term for what you should be experiencing is "cognitive dissonance."
 
7forever said:
You guys are all talking to yourselves...:eye-poppi

His head never moves forward and anyone who looks at it enough times would conclude the same.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter.

A bullet is not a fist. A bullet can impart less momentum than it takes to move a head while still having enough energy to pierce a skull and destroy the brain. It's about how the energy is applied. In the case of a bullet, it's is across a very small area, which can cause tissue, including bone, to give way without imparting movement to the surrounding areas. It is perfectly possible to have a bullet blow straight through someone's head and have the only movment being the natural slumping from having their CNS suddenly and violently destroyed.

Forget all of the dramatic deaths you've seen in movies and video games. People don't usually react like that when they are shot.

ETA: Oh, and if we are talking to ourselves, that's only because you won't listen.
 
Last edited:
You know you are a Kennedy Kook if... you don't comprehend how simple it was for Oswald to shoot Kennedy and present delusions of being shot through the engine block or windshield.

You know you are a Kennedy Kook if... you have not been to Dallas to see the shot view from the window and spew poppycock from other Kennedy kooks without checking or questioning their validity.

You know you are a Kennedy Kook if... you post "You guys are all talking to yourselves...:eye-poppi", in the "you know you are a Kennedy Kook" thread you started while posting "off-topic" proof of being a Kennedy Kook.

Don't need to argue which way the bullet entered because the wound is consistent with being shot from behind, and 7forever posted the photo showing the proof. A Kennedy Kook presents evidence contrary to their position and fails to comprehend it.

You know you are a Kennedy Kook if... you ignore posts like this and fail to take the time to education yourself.
EventHorizon said:
I'm going to attempt one more time to lead a horse to water.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

You also might want to read actual books rather than investi-googling.

Case Closed or Reclaiming History are both very good.

Since all I'm seeing are arguments from incredulity and ignorance rather than an actual desire to learn what happened I'm not going to bother to try to correct any mistakes myself, I'm just going to go ahead and post some links that will lead you to the answers you are looking for. If you choose to ignore them or claim what they say is false because they don't want to hear what they have to say then we are done here.
Click to expand...

Are you a JFK Kook because you can't do things that are hard; critical thinking, reading books, finding reality?
But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?

We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too. (JFK 1962)
Click to expand...
 
Official NWO Internal Memorandum, circa 1963: For future reference, when assassinating heads of states, do not exceed a shooter-to-patsy ratio greater than 1:0. Glue-sniffing X-Files fans may notice the discrepency and shoot in their pants.
 
7forever said:
Finally someone who isn't blindly attacking me.LOL What is clear to me is seeing both men react at 225. That happens visually without doubt. If a researcher is after the truth he/she will really watch Connally because he is the man to watch in the car. He throws his hands and head to his left as if a swarm of bees are about to attack his face.

He was scared out of mind because he heard the first shot miss at 147-160 and 3.5 seconds later a bullet passed his head on the left. It's in the film for anyone to see. After Kennedy receives the bullet, Connally's shot less than 3/4 of a second later from a rear shot. I really agree with you on Connally's shot because there isn't an obvious frame like that of jfk at 225 and 313 but that's what leads to research to pin down a time frame for Connally's shot.
Click to expand...
But none of that supports when the bullet hit Connally. Take this testimony in a recent court case:
She, her boyfriend and two cousins, were walking toward the escalator nearest the shooter when she heard what sounded like fireworks.

Before she could run, she felt her leg go numb, comparing it to a feeling of it being asleep.

“When I went to step on my leg, I realized I had no leg to step on,” she said. “I realized I’d been shot.”

She testified that the bullet went through the left side of her knee and exited just above her calf.
Click to expand...
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jul/08/jurors-watch-surveillance-video-ny-ny-casino-shoot/

Now, there's a few moments there between the sound of the shots and the victim realizing she'd been shot. Why would this be any different in Connally's case?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom