Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...

[Arus808]

could you join us in 2010, when all of these were dealt with 30 years ago?

 

[carlitos]

John Connally: "Absolutely not. I do not, for one second, believe the conclusions of the Warren Commission."

Well, who would I believe? John Connally himself, who never publicly said those words, or a blogger named Doug Thompson who, in the article itself, says that they were both drunk at the time? The article is attributed to Capitol Hill Blue, a site known to print myth as fact if it furthers their political agenda. Easy choice for some.

 

[CurtC]

John Connally knew both shots that hit Kennedy from the film came from the front and the one that him came from the rear.

Even if Connally said those words, why should we trust his opinion over the massive amount of evidence we have that the WC basically got it right?

 

[7forever]

Mr. SPECTER. What is the best estimate that you have as to the time span between the sound of the first shot and the feeling of someone hitting you in the back which you just described?

John thought there could be as many as 4 shooters.LOL He knew he was not shot by the same bullet because he knew the shot at 225 passed his head before it hit kennedy. No matter what he says in his testimony about lying about all the shots coming from the rear. His jump at 225 confirms the shot from the front. The chain of evidence regarding the windshield was researched by Doug Weldon. Put it this way...a jury would believe the shot came from the front, rule out the shot coming from the fence and would laugh at the shot coming from the rear because it's nonsense and is debunked solely based on evidence that supports a frontal shot. He knew he wasn't shot by the same bullet and that would hold up in any court and be believed by any half-assed prosecutor delivering the truth.
The real enemy of truth in this case is the grassy knoll.

Governor CONNALLY. A very, very brief span of time. Again my trend of thought just happened to be, I suppose along this line, I immediately thought that this--that I had been shot. I knew it when I just looked down and I was covered with blood, and the thought immediately passed through my mind that there were either two or three people involved or more in this or someone was shooting with an automatic rifle. These were just thoughts that went through my mind because of the rapidity of these two, of the first shot plus the blow that I took, and I knew I had been hit, and I immediately assumed, because of the amount of blood, and in fact, that it had obviously passed through my chest. that I had probably been fatally hit.

Governor CONNALLY. Well, first, again I assume the bullet was traveling faster than the sound. I was hit by the bullet prior to the time the sound reached me, and I was in either a state of shock or the impact was such that the sound didn't even register on me, but I was never conscious of hearing the second shot at all.
Obviously, at least the major wound that I took in the shoulder through the chest couldn't have been anything but the second shot. Obviously, it couldn't have been the third, because when the third shot was fired I was in a reclining position, and heard it, saw it and the effects of it, rather--I didn't see it, I saw the effects of it--so it obviously could not have been the third, and couldn't have been the first, in my judgment.

 

[carlitos]

Wow. A guy who got shot and thought he was "in a state of shock" thought "wow, this is happening fast," and has somewhat differing recollections of perspective. This evidence is compelling. You are taking it to the newspapers and relevant authorities now?

 

[7forever]

Even if Connally said those words, why should we trust his opinion over the massive amount of evidence we have that the WC basically got it right?

The WC said the fatal shot came from the rear even though the film shows the shot coming from the front and they ignored his head going backward violently. The WC was huge pile of nonsense and that was confirmed by the HSCA concluding there were 4 shots, therefore at least 2 shooters. John Connally covered for the government but was unwilling to play dumb in regards to his wounds being caused by the same bullet that hit Kennedy.

 

[carlitos]

The film shows the shot? Seriously? That's some fast film! How many frames per second?

ETA - Don't post a graphic photo here to 'prove' your point. That one yesterday was offensive.

 

[JimBenArm]

So, which government did Connally cover for? Was it the Dallas Independent School District? I bet that was it. They were shot from the School Book Depository, so they didn't want to look bad.
Or maybe it was the Dallas Utilities? There probably were several shooters hiding in the sewer system.
Maybe it was the Texas Legislature? They probably took a contract out on Connally, since he was the Governor. I heard he was the real target.
Or was it the Greek legislature? Onassis had influence there, and JFK being out of the way would grease the skids for him and Jackie to hook up.

You gotta be more specific about which government he was covering for!

 

[CurtC]

The WC said the fatal shot came from the rear even though the film shows the shot coming from the front

The Zapruder film shows the shot coming from the front? Where? Good ol' Jim Fetzer thinks the Zapruder film was faked, because it seems to support the conclusions of the WC. I wish you conspiracy guys would talk to each other and get your story straight.

The WC was huge pile of nonsense and that was confirmed by the HSCA concluding there were 4 shots, therefore at least 2 shooters.

You mean the HSCA conclusions that were based solely on "expert" testimony of acoustics evidence? The acoustics analysis that has since been shown without a doubt to be wrong? Besides that wrong acoustics analysis, was there anything else, anything at all, that they found which pointed to more than one shooter? No? Didn't think so.

 

[beachnut]

From an interview by journalist Doug Thomson
conducted in 1982.

Do you think LHO fired the gun that killed Kennedy?

John Connally: "Absolutely not. I do not, for one second, believe the conclusions of the Warren Commission."

John Connally knew both shots that hit Kennedy from the film came from the front and the one that him came from the rear.

Source? And where is the quote where Connally says the shots were from the front? Source?

The source is made up delusions from all your other failed sources. You googled it.

 

[tsig]

The WC said the fatal shot came from the rear even though the film shows the shot coming from the front and they ignored his head going backward violently. The WC was huge pile of nonsense and that was confirmed by the HSCA concluding there were 4 shots, therefore at least 2 shooters. John Connally covered for the government but was unwilling to play dumb in regards to his wounds being caused by the same bullet that hit Kennedy.

OK you're right now what?

 

[7forever]

OK you're right now what?

You could say the same thing about any cover-up. Nothing will happen, certainly not in the Kennedy case. The greatest victory would be a movie that told what really happened.

 

[carlitos]

LOL @ "The greatest victory would be a movie." Outstanding.

 

[7forever]

At least I'm being realistic. The grassy knoll is a red herring. Stone and Grodin did the government's bidding in promoting a false theory. The fatal shot came from the front not the right side. They fooled millions by editing a scene to make it look like it was fired from the fence.

 

[dudalb]

Oliver Stone was in on it?

 

[jhunter1163]

At least I'm being realistic. The grassy knoll is a red herring. Stone and Grodin did the government's bidding in promoting a false theory. The fatal shot came from the front not the right side. They fooled millions by editing a scene to make it look like it was fired from the fence.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

Here you go. Educate yourself and come back.

 

[7forever]

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

Here you go. Educate yourself and come back.

Educate yourself by looking at the angle of the fence. IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO CREATE THE EXIT WOUND ON THE REAR from the right side. There is no debating it. It would have exited the left side and obviously very risky in accidentally shooting Jackie. The fence shot was NONSENSE from the day it happened. No gunshot wounds were caused from the fence.

 

[7forever]

the first 3 shots

1. missed shot; frame 147-160. Connally looks left and back right by 169.

2. 225 is the first gunshot wound and enters Kennedy's throat but passes by Connally's head first. the bullet comes through the windshield. Connally flinches, throwing his hands/arms up to his left at 225.

3. Connally is struck in the back from the back at 234-238 and received four wounds. He said himself after viewing the film he was hit at 234 and his family doctor said he was in a postion to receieve those wounds around those frames.

 

[EventHorizon]

1. missed shot; frame 147-160. Connally looks left and back right by 169.

2. 225 is the first gunshot wound and enters Kennedy's throat but passes by Connally's head first. the bullet comes through the windshield. Connally flinches, throwing his hands/arms up to his left at 225.

3. Connally is struck in the back from the back at 234-238 and received four wounds. He said himself after viewing the film he was hit at 234 and his family doctor said he was in a postion to receieve those wounds around those frames.

Well jeez, if the family doctor said so, it MUST be true.

 

[kookbreaker]

Educate yourself by looking at the angle of the fence. IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO CREATE THE EXIT WOUND ON THE REAR from the right side. There is no debating it. It would have exited the left side and obviously very risky in accidentally shooting Jackie. The fence shot was NONSENSE from the day it happened. No gunshot wounds were caused from the fence.

Not what jhunter was suggesting. Try again. This time look at the link.