• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...

TK0001 said:
How could anyone be able to tell by looking at an actual bullet hole in a windshield, from which direction the bullet was fired?
Click to expand...

If the windshield was laminated you could tell from looking at the layers of glass and laminate. Especially if a layer of laminate on one side is still intact.

If a bullet goes through the glass you can tell from the shape of the hole it makes in the glass. The hole on the exit side will be larger than then entrance side.

It just takes careful observation and some scrutiny of the evidence.

AA024093.jpg
 
Typicallucas said:
If the windshield was laminated you could tell from looking at the layers of glass and laminate. Especially if a layer of laminate on one side is still intact.

If a bullet goes through the glass you can tell from the shape of the hole it makes in the glass. The hole on the exit side will be larger than then entrance side.

It just takes careful observation and some scrutiny of the evidence.

[qimg]http://www.fotosearch.com/bthumb/PDS/PDS059/AA024093.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

One would think it should be even easier to recognize the difference between a bullet hole and a crack, but the testimony of the woman in the documentary (forgot her name, too lazy to go look it up), who declared herself an expert because she's been around guns all her life, was just so convincing.

[/sarcasm]

Also, roundhead, welcome back. Please address our many questions directed to you in this thread. Thanks.
 
TK0001 said:
One would think it should be even easier to recognize the difference between a bullet hole and a crack, but the testimony of the woman in the documentary (forgot her name, too lazy to go look it up), who declared herself an expert because she's been around guns all her life, was just so convincing.

[/sarcasm]

Also, roundhead, welcome back. Please address our many questions directed to you in this thread. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Evalea Glanges, and she seemed credible. That means her memory after over 45 years and her word are practically gold. I guess Roundhead's position on this glass thing and on the Warren Commission report is indefensible. A pity.
 
TK0001 said:
Bump. Roundhead, please confirm, deny, or offer a different version of events.

Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

I think there were multiple shooters, none of whom were Oswald, they didnt get very lucky, and its very likely the driver capped him .

It sure wasnt Oswald, if it was he wouldnt be dead, are wouldnt have been so soon after the murder
 
Last edited:
roundhead said:
I think there were multiple shooters
Click to expand...

How many? And where were they located?

roundhead said:
they didnt get very lucky
Click to expand...

You think the driver killed him, and he "didn't get very lucky"? I would consider it miraculous that no one saw the driver shoot him, not just lucky.

roundhead said:
and its very likely the driver capped him .
Click to expand...

In broad daylight. And no one saw or heard the shot coming from the car. Including those riding in the car.

roundhead said:
It sure wasnt Oswald, if it was he wouldnt be dead, are wouldnt have been so soon after the murder
Click to expand...

I have no idea what this means.
 
roundhead said:
I think there were multiple shooters, none of whom were Oswald, they didnt get very lucky, and its very likely the driver capped him .

It sure wasnt Oswald, if it was he wouldnt be dead, are wouldnt have been so soon after the murder
Click to expand...

What happened to the three bullets from the shots made by Oswald?
 
Doug Weldon

The goons covering up the hole in the windshield is no different than them covering up the massive exit wound that could have only come from a front shooter. Watch Connally react to the bullet at 225-26 as it passes his head. The first shot missed at 147-160. The second gunshot and first gunshot wound came through the windshield at 225 and entered Kennedy's throat. The third shot was fired from the rear and entered Connally's back between 234-238. Connally said himself he was hit by 234 and his doctor said his body was in a position to receieve the four wounds he suffered between 234-238. There were at least 5 shots, the last two being bang, bang.;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czQKoxjcvgc
 
7forever said:
The goons covering up the hole in the windshield is no different than them covering up the massive exit wound that could have only come from a front shooter.
Click to expand...

So basically any evidence that does not agree with your preconceived notions is part of a 'cover-up'?

OK, we are done here.
 
7forever said:
The goons covering up ...
Click to expand...
Who? You have evidence of a cover-up? Please name names and show your proof.

You could clear up some of your apprehension about JFK if you go to the window where Oswald shot Kennedy. You will find that anyone taking a pot shot at someone fading away from the window could be hit by accident let alone if you were aiming.

If you have proof you would have what it takes to earn a Pulitzer Prize, but you only have delusions based on more delusions; on the Pulitzer Prize ask Woodward and Bernstein who took out a president the correct way, and for your delusions good luck.
 
From an interview by journalist Doug Thomson
conducted in 1982.

Do you think LHO fired the gun that killed Kennedy?

John Connally: "Absolutely not. I do not, for one second, believe the conclusions of the Warren Commission."

John Connally knew both shots that hit Kennedy from the film came from the front and the one that him came from the rear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom