Moderated Obama birth certificate CT / SSN CT / Birther discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if by running for office, Orly somehow thinks that might make the justice system a little scared of going after her. Then she could claim that it was "politically motivated".
 
It can vary by party- since the primary election is to select the candidate to be fielded by a particular party, they get to set the rules for the selection.

IIRC, here in California Democratic primaries are open but only voters registered Republican can vote in a Republican primary.

Orly's notion of running for state office does raise a question:

WHY THE **** DO WE NOT HAVE A SECRETARY OF ◊◊◊◊◊◊*ERY?

She would be perfect for the job and let's face it- if we're to maintain California's reputation as where all the loose screws in America wind up, we need a state-level official tasked with doing that.
 
If she's fully sanctioned for waisting the court's time and the State Bar goes after her licence or at least suspends her as it should, that will make a great commercial.
 
WHen she campaigns here in Sacramento, I bet I will be able to see the crazy level in Sactown go up.......
 
Chris Strunk has decided to join Orly’s suit against Obama. He filed a motion to be joined to the case.

The filing is 81 pages of rambling word salad.

A quick scan produced the following highlights:


”You're Fired!”
Affirmant on January 23, 2009 duly “Fired” the Defendant for cause
(See Exhibit 1
) in that Defendant Obama has “Dual Allegiance” at birth, and
failed to prove eligibility to serve as POTUS and therefore may not use
Affirmant’s power of attorney as the POTUS trustee / administrator.
Click to expand...


Birdie?
the direct injury to
Affirmant related to the fact that Affirmant on January 23, 2009 duly “Fired” the
Defendant for cause in that Defendant Obama has “Dual Allegiance” at birth, and
failed to prove eligibility to serve as POTUS, and (iii) Defendant Obama with Dual
Allegiance is ineligible to serve as the Administer and Trustee of Affirmant’s
power of attorney over Affirmant’s personal account at the U.S. Department of
Treasury; (iv) that subsequent to duly firing Barack Hussein Obama (a.k.a. “Barry
Soetoro”, a.k.a. “Steve Dunham”, a.k.a. “Birdie Obama”)
Click to expand...


You want HOW MUCH in damages?
The Plaintiff sues the Defendants for unjustly detaining the Plaintiffs goods and chattels, as the Usurper, Barack Hussein Obama, is ineligible to be the President of the United States Trustee / Administrator over any United States Departments and Secretaries with fiduciary responsibilities and the Usurper having been denied use of Plaintiffs power of Attorney on January 23,2009 has by Usurper's continued actions that are void ab initio, including the waivers issued as to Defendant Secretaries and others, pillage Plaintiff's personal property to wit:

A) the Plaintiffs Bond issued upon his birth certificate of CHRlSTOPHER EARL STRUNK after the birth in New York City on January 23, 1947 in the amount of 19687.5 troy ounces of gold;

B) the Plaintiffs private account at the US Treasury is secured by the Plaintiffs numbered Bond kept at the U.S. Department of Commerce with the Bond number issued by the Social Security Administration; and

C) The interest accrued upon the Plaintiff's investment into commerce since the year of 1963 thru now calculated upon the record by the Social Security Earnings Statement compounded annually at the respective annual U.S. Treasury Bond Rate from 1963.

And the Plaintiff claims that the same be taken from the Defendants and delivered to Plaintiff; or, if they are eloigned, that Plaintiff may have judgment of their value and all mesne profits and damages, which he estimates at the present value of $21,656,250.00 dollars based upon the equivalent current market value of gold with a net present value of 5,4317 troy ounces of gold, and 909 troy ounces of gold accumulated interest on Plaintiffs investment into commerce since 1963 besides costs.
Click to expand...

I’m not sure just how he figures this “gold” is his. is this some form of freeman woo?
 
Alferd_Packer said:
Chris Strunk has decided to join Orly’s suit against Obama. He filed a motion to be joined to the case.

The filing is 81 pages of rambling word salad.

A quick scan produced the following highlights:


”You're Fired!”



Birdie?



You want HOW MUCH in damages?


I’m not sure just how he figures this “gold” is his. is this some form of freeman woo?
Click to expand...

I know what Orly's first thoughts were when she read this:

"Ooh, 'eloigned'! I wish I'd used that!"
 
Myron Proudfoot said:
Looks like a great blend of Freeman woo AND Birtherism!!
Click to expand...


Definitely. The first page, with the fellow's name including a colon (Christopher-Earl : Strunk) is a dead giveaway even before reading any further.
 
Is there some fotl significance to the © he inserts in his name before in esse?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom