AE 911 Truth at Full Juggernaut Strength (1,000)

^^^^^ Oh my, this post is full to the very brim with pwnage. Well done metamars.:D

Yet still, here you folks are, 'pwning' the evil debunkers on relatively obscure internet forums closing in on a decade after the event.

Maybe you can spare a couple minutes and take a quick break from your Epic Internet Battle With The Forces of Satantm and convince some law-enforcement agency, some respected media member who longs for a Pulitzer Prize, some major engineering or scientific organization from ANYWHERE ON EARTH that you aren't stark, raving, mad.

Just a suggestion
 
I'd go as far as to suggest that if the growth rate continues, the number of engineers who belong to AE911Truth will eventually exceed the number of stars in the known universe.

This kind of hyperbole cannot disguise the epic FAIL that metamars just exposed. Take it on the chin.
 
Yet still, here you folks are, 'pwning' the evil debunkers on relatively obscure internet forums closing in on a decade after the event.

Maybe you can spare a couple minutes and take a quick break from your Epic Internet Battle With The Forces of Satantm and convince some law-enforcement agency, some respected media member who longs for a Pulitzer Prize, some major engineering or scientific organization from ANYWHERE ON EARTH that you aren't stark, raving, mad.

Just a suggestion

Change of subject noted. The cavalry has arrived to cover the embarassment of another debunker.
 
Change of subject noted. The cavalry has arrived to cover the embarassment of another debunker.

So its our fault Gage is so poor at checking peoples credentials and information out?

Good one.
 
This kind of hyperbole cannot disguise the epic FAIL that metamars just exposed. Take it on the chin.

Well, just looking at the problem I posed mathematically, it's not hyperbole. An endless growth of 16% by any set of objects will tend to infinity. So, eventually, our theoretical ae911truth membership role will exceed the number of atoms in the universe, then the number of quarks, then the number of strings in this universe, then the number of strings in the multiverse, etc.
 
Change of subject noted. The cavalry has arrived to cover the embarassment of another debunker.

No. The message is clear. I've seen truthers get their asses handed to them plenty of times too. It's not about that. Your little "go team" crap is irrelevant.

This whole issue is about your misplaced arrogance in the face of the total failure of your delightful little movement in convincing people who could actually DO something about it that you aren't idiots. It's about impotency.
 
This kind of hyperbole cannot disguise the epic FAIL that metamars just exposed. Take it on the chin.

Ah I see now.

Metamars is debating some irrelevant hypothetical scenario... and thats apparently pwn'd us.

I seeeee... Good job...
 
No. The message is clear. I've seen truthers get their asses handed to them plenty of times too. It's not about that. Your little "go team" crap is irrelevant.

This whole issue is about your misplaced arrogance in the face of the total failure of your delightful little movement in convincing people who could actually DO something about it that you aren't idiots. It's about impotency.

No need to get personal. Viagra sorted that out.

Oh, you meant....sorry.

Well there is nobody more impotent than the debunkers. Whose minds have you changed? What effect have you had on the truth movement? It seems all you have done is help them refine their arguments and increase accountability at their websites. There is no group who have more of a "go team" schtick going than debunkers. Try searching this forum for the phrase "JREF ninjas" and you will see what I mean in all of it's embarassing glory.
 
No need to get personal. Viagra sorted that out.

Oh, you meant....sorry.

Well there is nobody more impotent than the debunkers. Whose minds have you changed?

They changed my mind for a start.

What effect have you had on the truth movement? It seems all you have done is help them refine their arguments and increase accountability at their websites.

More like refined their lies.

When has Gage ever admitted any of his errors? Even though every single one of his indicators of explosive demolition that he has an entire presentation on is easily shown to be 100% wrong
 
They changed my mind for a start.

So you say, although you might be lying. If you joined the truth movement then immediately joined the debunking movement then perhaps you are easily led. Try to be a bit more free-thinking.

Are you the only example you are going to give. All the debunking movement achieved is converting one internet poster?


More like refined their lies.

When has Gage ever admitted any of his errors? Even though every single one of his indicators of explosive demolition that he has an entire presentation on is easily shown to be 100% wrong

Which lies has Gage told?
 
So you say, although you might be lying.

Why? I'm not the first, lots people here used to be truthers.
If you joined the truth movement then immediately joined the debunking movement

I was a truther for about a year and a half.

After a while of finding out for myself how wrong most of their claims were on my own (I had already discounted demolition as unrealistic) I still thought there was something to it, it was at this point I approached the JREF forums.

then perhaps you are easily led. Try to be a bit more free-thinking.

I was a truther for about year and a half.

Why cant you imagine that I stopped being truther because I couldn't defend such poor arguments and blatant dishonesty anymore?

Which lies has Gage told?

Its more about how Gage is disingenuous, dishonest, and completely ignorant of whatever he talks about. Gage doesn't understand building collapses, fire, explosives, demolitions or even sound itself.
 
Last edited:
But that is one of the strengths of our organization. With only 1 in 10,000 licensed professionals supporting us the only way to go is up

So you guys better get used to it.
Heh... Not unless I start reporting the electrical engineers for fraud. :D
 
Last edited:
Why? I'm not the first, lots people here used to be truthers.


I was a truther for about a year and a half.

After a while of finding out for myself how wrong most of their claims on my own (I had already discounted demolition as unrealistic) I still thought there was something to it, it was at this point I approached the JREF forums.



I was a truther for about year and a half.

Why cant you imagine that I stopped being truther because I couldn't defend such poor arguments and blatant dishonesty?



Its more about how Gage is disingenuous, dishonest, and completely ignorant of whatever he talks about. Gage doesn't understand building collapses, fire, explosives, demolitions or even sound itself.

I see from your first post on the forum that you were impressed with Press for Truth and In Their Own Words. Now that you have become a debunker perhaps you could point me to a debunking of those films.

Do you believe they have no merit now?
 
I see from your first post on the forum that you were impressed with Press for Truth and In Their Own Words. Now that you have become a debunker perhaps you could point me to a debunking of those films.

Do you believe they have no merit now?

Those films make a lot less claims, those films are more like little falsehoods and half truths here and there but mostly amounts to the gubmint is bad and incompetent that's why we should have a new investigation, with a sprinkling of MIHOP lunacy when they bring up WTC7 but make no specific claims. (if I recall)

If you have a specific claim you want to see addressed from the film start a new thread about it.
 
Last edited:
Any engineer who has looked at the facts knows that the Towers were taken down. But many or most of them took the government version at face value and did not look further, I have seen interviews with engineers who cannot believe that they themselves once believed the OCT.

Many engineers saw through the subterfuge but do not have the moral courage to come right out and stand up to be counted. This in stark contrast to the members of ae911truth.org. But you can be certain that there is a strong groundbase of people who will confirm the inside job when they judge it to be safe to do so.

In the beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared and scorned. But in time when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing to be patriot.
--Mark Twain
Your leading cause of the collapse defies the laws of thermodynamics. I thought you guys were idiots before with some of the idiotic analysis video analysis that you performed. Now that I have a basic idea of how nanoparticles behave I realized that you ****ed that up also.
 
Last edited:
Those films make a lot less claims, those films are more like little falsehoods and half truths here and there but mostly amounts to the gubmint is bad and incompetent that's why we should have a new investigation, with a sprinkling of MIHOP lunacy when they bring up WTC7 but make no specific claims. (if I recall)

If you have a specific claim you want to see addressed from the film start a new thread about it.

I am just interested in what changed your mind. I have read your entire first thread and you went over a little easily IMO, my BS detector went to red alert.

I notice in the first page of that thread that a debunker seemed equally confused and called you very "un-truther like". I have to admit, I agree with him.
 
I am just interested in what changed your mind. I have read your entire first thread and you went over a little easily IMO, my BS detector went to red alert.

I notice in the first page of that thread that a debunker seemed equally confused and called you very "un-truther like". I have to admit, I agree with him.

Obviously, he had half a brain. ;)
 
Edx, you described how you were treated in a another thread, when you first joined

In my personal experience in the BBC conspiracy files thread shows me while not everyone is this way, a large number here do seem to be unable to conceed any point no matter how trivial. Not only that, but treat me very harshly just because I didnt agree with them. I didnt know what button to press to report posts, but no one else did it either. Posts and threads on here have had admin cleanups for far less than the kind of needless personal attacks I received on there. Ive seen people on this forum being accused of being "pseudo skeptics" just agreeing with the general "group think", and I think to a certian extent thats probably what is going on because I cant explain what happened there any other way

Why are you now exhibiting and condoning the same behaviour that you described being subject to by people here?
 
Edx, you described how you were treated in a another thread, when you first joined

Why are you now exhibiting and condoning the same behaviour that you described being subject to by people here?

For a start, at the time I wasnt aware of how much Alex Jones and Loose Change lie and just how bad they were. I really shouldn't have been defending them.

Secondly, you arent aware of the conversations I'm referring to or of the points I raised. I can see now that as I was defending the truthers based on my own ignorance of a lot of the points I was making, I just couldnt see it at the time. But either I was too slow to get it or they weren't explaining it to me clear enough it just went to argument hell eventually, which means you end up debating more about who said what and what they really meant when they said it, rather than about the points in question.

The only valid point I made was that certain debunkers can have a tendency to not have much time anymore to assume you are honest because they have come across so many liars in the truth movement (such as those just "JAQing"). As a consequence they can come across as very short and even rude sometimes, as a casual observer if you dont know why you could wonder why they were like that.

I had great respect for skeptics for a long time and this forum and the JREF in general since I had debated religion and Creation and general "woo" for ages. I really had no knowledge of any conspiracy theories and the people who promoted them apart from Creationist ones until I learnt about 911Truthers through Zeitgeist, eventually I realised my skeptics and JREF community didnt subscribe to it, but instead of discarding them as "close minded" or say they were just working for the gubmint (which I thought was just plain stupid) I was willing to find out WHY they were so critical and acted that way, since at the back of my mind I knew there had to be a reason. So I at least wanted to see if I could find out what that was.

As I eventually discarded all truther beliefs and debated them myself, I can now see where all that frustration comes from. Not all truthers are like that, but they are ones that are willing to change their minds and several people have PM'd me in other forums and said I helped them change their minds and helped them think differently.

Around here unfortunately you usually get the worst of the worst, the looniest of the looniest. Just look at Bill Smith, who thinks glowing molten steel was running down the streets and covering buildings or Heiwa who believes that you'd have to drop the top part of the WTC from a distance of 2 miles up in order to crush the bottom part.

But thats just the tip of the ice berg. Since I stated a youtube channel the kinds of things truthers have told me have been I-N-S-A-N-E. So yes, I have grown quite frustrated with them myself and while I know i am a lot more patient than some people here I would have given myself a good thrashing back then believe me even though I would have been more patient. Thing is, I would have listened, because I did. For example, while I didnt like the way Mark Roberts argued at all on the internet, I had to admit that he was right and now I really respect the work he did and why he gets so pissed off at these guys. If you look at my opening post, I deserved a MUCH worse reception than I got, yet people like TAM welcomed me.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom