bill smith
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 8,408
Yes, these have all been explained. Just not to your liking.
Just as a matter f interest what is your best explanation for Fillipe David's injuries ? (Skin hanging off, otherwise functional_)
Yes, these have all been explained. Just not to your liking.
fire
You made an error, engineers don't spread moronic delusions, he is a AE911t delusion supporter, not an AE911t engineer....
This is an invitation to one of the AE911t engineers ...
Just as a matter f interest what is your best explanation for Fillipe David's injuries ? (Skin hanging off, otherwise functional_)
We know there was fire in his vicinity, so the best explanation, clearly, is that he was burned.
Any hypothesis that requires something we don't KNOW was present (such as explosives) is a weaker explanation.
It sounds to me like his skin experienced a sudden general application of searing heat without flames. There is no mention of his hair or clothes being burned as far as I am aware.
Oh, brother.
... There is no mention of his hair or clothes being burned as far as I am aware.
I just received a rather bizarre PM from Childlike Empress.
It includes these statements:
Bill, You watch too many movies. Burns are not a "blast effect".True though
I thought about your stunt here, Tom. It's actually quite hilarious.
First, he left out the first sentence of my PM: "I didn't question your degree, i questioned your authority."
It was an answer to the initial PM he sent me. That PM contained his alleged degree, University and year, followed by the sentence "I'd appreciate it if you'd keep my personal info confidential."
And then he turns around and publically posts parts of my PM.
What a trustworthy guy.
Did you try to trick me into publishing your alleged personal information, Tom?
Epic fail.
First, he left out the first sentence of my PM: "I didn't question your degree, i questioned your authority."
"... as far as [you] are aware ..."
You've shown that to be a rather insignificant distance.![]()
Feel free to also elaborate on the engineering aspects of my original claim that sparked your reply to me. (My claim that "the fall of the unsupported WTC7 walls could be understood with 'sophomore level engineering'.")
Wrong again. Your claim was "The collapse mechanisms & dynamics are freshman level engineering."
I'm not interested in any further discussion with you.
"... as far as [you] are aware ..."
You've shown that to be a rather insignificant distance.![]()
I hope the mods will indulge me here in producing the entire llst.
If one integrated theory can pull all these things together it must be obvious that it needs looking into...
Concrete reduced to talcum powder dimensions....explained
'Steel to China'. ruse ....explained
Missing core columns....explained
'Meteorites'....explained
huge volume of nanothermite needed ....explained
How the nanothermite was planted unseen....explained
Steel flow from 81st floor WTC2....explained
Antenna falls first WTC1.....explained
Why the pile stayed hot for 100 days...explained
No thermite glare...explained
missing 110 acres of floorpans....explained
missing 220 acres steel floor reinforcing....explained
'Steel to China'. ruse ....explained
Fireball from elevator.....explained
Filipe David's injuries (skin hanging off).....explained.
Do you mean burned,Boiled or broiled ?