• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Invitation to Derek Johnson to discuss his ideas

aggle-rithm said:
For some reason, this is sticking in my mind:



Would you be willing to share this theory?
Click to expand...

Let me guess. It involves super duper nanothermite, a substance that no one has ever seen or heard of. It's existance was leaked to a brave band of Truth revolutionaries. But they are the only ones, outside of the evil government scientists who developed it, who know what it can do. My guess is that it is silent, cuts through steel at any angle and operates exactly the way the WTC 1, 2 and 7 collapsed. It's a mighty substance this super duper nanothermite, but without it, the black op on 911 would not have been possible.

Right Bill?
 
Last edited:
scott.in.taiwan said:
Let me guess. It involves super duper nanothermite, a substance that no one has ever seen or heard of. It's existance was leaked to a brave band of Truth revolutionaries. But they are the only ones, outside of the evil government scientists who developed it, who know what it can do. My guess is that it is silent, cuts through steel at any angle and operates exactly the way the WTC 1, 2 and 7 collapsed. It's a mighty substance this super duper nanothermite, but without it, the black op on 911 would not have been possible.

Right Bill?
Click to expand...

My theory takes care of many problems.

Concrete reduced to talcum powder dimensions....explained.

Missing core columns....explained

Meteorites....explained

huge volume of nanothermite....explained

How the NT was planted unseen....explained

Steel flow from 81st floor WTC2....explained

Antenna falls first WTC1.....explained

Why the pile stayed hot for 100 days...explained

No thermite glare...explained

missing 110 acres floorpans....explained

missing 220 acres steel floor reinforcing....explained

So yes...I would like to run it past Derek.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
My theory takes care of many problems.

Concrete reduced to talcum powder dimensions....explained.

Missing core columns....explained

Meteorites....explained

huge volume of nanothermite....explained

How the NT was planted unseen....explained

Steel flow from 81st floor WTC2....explained

Antenna falls first WTC1.....explained

Why the pile stayed hot for 100 days...explained

No thermite glare...explained

missing 110 acres floorpans....explained

missing 220 acres steel floor reinforcing....explained

So yes...I would like to run it past Derek.
Click to expand...

I'm sure it does, Bill. When I was 12 years old, I had world government all figured out. Best of luck with your 'theory'.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Apparently you aren't.
Click to expand...

To clarify, I meant "the collapse dynamics of the tall, thin, unsupported external walls - once the collapse had progressed to the point that I'd described - is (OK) sophomore level structures."


Tom

PS. Yeah, I am.
 
tfk said:
To clarify, I meant "the collapse dynamics of the tall, thin, unsupported external walls - once the collapse had progressed to the point that I'd described - is (OK) sophomore level structures."


Tom

PS. Yeah, I am.
Click to expand...

So T. Is Derek J. following this thread or not ?
 
bill smith said:
My theory takes care of many problems.

Concrete reduced to talcum powder dimensions....explained.

Missing core columns....explained

Meteorites....explained

huge volume of nanothermite....explained

How the NT was planted unseen....explained

Steel flow from 81st floor WTC2....explained

Antenna falls first WTC1.....explained

Why the pile stayed hot for 100 days...explained

No thermite glare...explained

missing 110 acres floorpans....explained

missing 220 acres steel floor reinforcing....explained

So yes...I would like to run it past Derek.
Click to expand...

So what is your theory?
 
tfk said:
To clarify, I meant "the collapse dynamics of the tall, thin, unsupported external walls - once the collapse had progressed to the point that I'd described - is (OK) sophomore level structures."


Tom

PS. Yeah, I am.
Click to expand...


Engineering freshmen aren't allowed anywhere near dynamics. If you don't know that, you may have a degree, but that doesn't mean too much these days.
 
Tony Szamboti said:
It is really hard to take what you are saying here seriously as one would have to think that the NIST performed a stringent review of David Chandler's work on the acceleration of WTC 7. Afterall they revised their report agreeing with him that there was 2.25 seconds of freefall acceleration, and nobody admits a mistake without heavy scrutiny of the criticism which caused them to admit to the mistake.
Click to expand...


Cut this not taking your opponents "seriously" Szamboti. If anyone is not to be taken seriously it is you. Come to your senses. Take a hammer and knock your head. Take an ice cold bath, or whatever.

Or, try the following procedure. lay out all the facts you have. Check them. Weed out the falsehoods. Then start to build your case. Now, check the rules of inference you applied. Weed out the logical fallacies. Try to arrive at conclusions using only valid rules of inference. After trying you will see that you can't. Hopefully your beliefs will implode to nothingness.

You see, your beliefs are delusional. That you haven't been able to have your earth-shattering paper in a academic peer-reviewed journal might be a hint. You are demonstratively wrong. And trivially so.

Simply, cut it the bullocks.
 
NutCracker said:
Cut this not taking your opponents "seriously" Szamboti. If anyone is not to be taken seriously it is you. Come to your senses. Take a hammer and knock your head. Take an ice cold bath, or whatever.

Or, try the following procedure. lay out all the facts you have. Check them. Weed out the falsehoods. Then start to build your case. Now, check the rules of inference you applied. Weed out the logical fallacies. Try to arrive at conclusions using only valid rules of inference. After trying you will see that you can't. Hopefully your beliefs will implode to nothingness.

You see, your beliefs are delusional. That you haven't been able to have your earth-shattering paper in a academic peer-reviewed journal might be a hint. You are demonstratively wrong. And trivially so.

Simply, cut it the bullocks.
Click to expand...

No, no, no...Tony's one of the 911 heroes. If it wasn't for their brave work, we would know nothing about the agents of Larry Silverstein. Slowly, from their garage, they are constructing a picture that includes super agents like Lloyd and Shirley England, firefighters of the FDNY, as well police. We should even be thanking Judy Wood and her crew for helping in the call that alerted us to the biggest scandel on Earth.

Through your bravery facing the tyrants that really run the show, Tony and Killtown have made the world a better place. Thanks Tony. And thanks to all your friends.
 
scott.in.taiwan said:
No, no, no...Tony's one of the 911 heroes. If it wasn't for their brave work, we would know nothing about the agents of Larry Silverstein. Slowly, from their garage, they are constructing a picture that includes super agents like Lloyd and Shirley England, firefighters of the FDNY, as well police. We should even be thanking Judy Wood and her crew for helping in the call that alerted us to the biggest scandel on Earth.

Through your bravery facing the tyrants that really run the show, Tony and Killtown have made the world a better place. Thanks Tony. And thanks to all your friends.
Click to expand...

Well, the likes of Killtown deserve living in the dungeons of stupidity for eternity. It is their natural habitat. And frankly. I want them there. I don't want them to live in the world of the sane. Their negative intelligence might rub off, be contagious, you know, like a prion disease.

But Tony is a different matter. He is intelligent, just delusional. Which makes it so painful to watch.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Engineering freshmen aren't allowed anywhere near dynamics. If you don't know that, you may have a degree, but that doesn't mean too much these days.
Click to expand...
The he said she said routine eh (of which I'll apparently be joining)... I'm still in college and I can vouch for it in architecture; 2nd year architecture students take a class on structures which does, in fact, cover basic dynamics of which he clarified for. In my university there are two levels which are taken during the fall and spring semesters respectively.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Engineering freshmen aren't allowed anywhere near dynamics. If you don't know that, you may have a degree, but that doesn't mean too much these days.
Click to expand...

Engineering freshmen are allowed close to any field with which they feel comfortable.

When I was an engineering undergrad (39 years ago), we took statics & dynamics as sophomores.

Buckling theory is covered under statics.

With computers aided education, they are teaching calculus to high school senior and precocious juniors. Software like Mathematica & both standard approaches & new ones, like Steve Wolfram's New Kind of Science, are taking a bunch of the drudge-work out of this math & bringing this sort of analysis to younger students.

Besides, I gave you "sophomore engineering" already.

Tom

PS. If you want to question my cred as a mechanical engineer, surely you can do better than this.

PPS. BTW, nice divert. I could be a friggin' sanitation engineer, and the objective question I put to tony still stands.
 
Last edited:
tfk said:
Engineering freshmen are allowed close to any field with which they feel comfortable.

When I was an engineering undergrad (39 years ago), we took statics & dynamics as sophomores.
Click to expand...
Same here.

Software like Mathematica & both standard approaches & new ones, like Steve Wolfram's New Kind of Science, are taking a bunch of the drudge-work out of this math
Click to expand...
"Drudge-work" in math? Bite your tongue!
 
bill smith said:
I definitely would be if Derek showed up or if I knew for sure he was following this thread.
Click to expand...

What kind of cockamamie theory is this that it requires a specific person's presence before it can be revealed?

Do you know what "theory" means?

Don't bother to answer. I think I've got it pretty much figured out.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Engineering freshmen aren't allowed anywhere near dynamics. If you don't know that, you may have a degree, but that doesn't mean too much these days.
Click to expand...

I thought all the best and brightest engineering professionals were in the truth movement. Are you saying they are actually freshmen and thus can't be expected to solve such problems?

Or (as I suspect is true) are you just arguing semantics?
 
aggle-rithm said:
What kind of cockamamie theory is this that it requires a specific person's presence before it can be revealed?

Do you know what "theory" means?

Don't bother to answer. I think I've got it pretty much figured out.
Click to expand...

If I was to answer only for you guys who knows ?...I could be just talking to a bunch of Shills for all I know. Therefore I would prefer to lay it out for at least one person that I know is a patriot. That way we could all have a lively conversation and I could get some feedback I am sure to respect and can maybe use.

Here are three further points that are directly covered in my theory. This is really a lot of points in all.I am beginning to think that I have cracked it. I hope Derek shows up. Maybe T. can ask him.

'Steel to China'. ruse ....explained

Fireball from elevator.....explained

Filipe David's injuries (skin hanging off).....explained.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom