Hey Stupid, It’s Deism, not Atheism
People who label themselves atheists are simply stupid, insecure, and lost little sheep following the teachings of greedy con artists and disinformation agents like Richard Dawkins, currently the world’s most notorious atheist. Dawkins, a professor at Oxford, reportedly an expert in the sexual practices of farm animals and a devout follower of the racist Charles Darwin, has made a fortune selling his flawed and destructive atheistic philosophy to millions of pseudo intellectuals who falsely believe denying any god is somehow cool.
Richard Dawkins has replaced Anthony Flew as the world’s leading atheist, because Flew learned the scientific truth and now believes in deism. While both men have taught at Oxford, Anthony Flew is a real philosopher in pursuit of the truth while Dawkins is not. Anthony Flew has always practiced the philosophy of Plato’s Socrates who taught, “We must follow the argument wherever it goes.”
Flew earned his fame by arguing that one should presuppose atheism until evidence of God surfaced. The world of microbiology, especially the super sophisticated complexity of DNA, convinced Flew
that a deity or super-intelligence is the ONLY good explanation for the origin of life and the complexity of nature.
Flew wrote a book about his conversion from atheism to deism based entirely on the latest developments in science. Read his book There is a God: How the world’s most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind
In a letter to Richard Carrier of the Secular Web on 12/29/2004, Flew wrote, “I now realize I have made a fool of myself by believing that there were no presentable theories of the development of inanimate matter up to the first living creature capable of reproduction.”
He explains how he was misled by Richard Dawkins claiming, “Dawkins has never been reported as referring to any promising work on the production of a theory of the development of living matter.” Why? I believe Dawkins is more interested in establishing atheism as the world’s true religion with himself as the self-appointed Pope.
In 2006, Flew joined 11 other academics in urging the British government to teach Intelligent Design in the state schools. In 2007, in an interview with Benjamin Wiker, Flew said, “My deism was a result of a growing empathy with the insight of Einstein and other noted scientists that there had to be an Intelligence behind the integrated complexity of the physical universe.”
Flew went on to say, “And my own insight that the integrated complexity of Life itself-which is far more complex than the physical universe-can only be explained in terms of an Intelligent Source.”
In addition, Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution has been proven to be false. Of course, the greedy and deceitful folks leading the atheist movement certainly don’t want their sheep to learn the truth about Darwin. Simply check out David Wilcock and Tim Harwood.
They will lead you to the truth about the many flaws in Darwin’s “theory”.
I am just embarrassed for the many stupid people, living in the 21st century, who continue to label themselves atheists in light of such overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Hey stupid, it’s Deism, not Atheism!![/QUOTE]
The underlined statements are examples of logical fallacies, namely ad hominems, a baseless statement and a false dichotomy, plus a mild bandwagon fallacy. Also, deism is compatible with evolution just like theism and atheism. There’s just a difference in metaphysical beliefs. (By the way, I doubt that Flew stated that the theory of evolution is entirely false…unless you have evidence that says otherwise)
To show why I don’t follow this bandwagon fallacy that is targeted towards deists, consider the example of two atheists, Bill Maher and Michael Shermer. Bill Maher advocates AIDs denial while Shermer does not. Bill is, probably, a leftists, while Shermer advocated free markets and the like. (Now, for a more extreme political example, consider Ayn Rand versus Karl Marx, libertarianism versus socialism. Marx and Rand are both atheists yet they are polar opposites when it comes to political beliefs.)
I consider myself a deist as well (a secular one to be precise), with a political stance that leans to the right (low taxes, free markets and the like). Deists, as well as agnostics, atheists, theists, apatheists (not caring at all whether or not a god exists) etc all have differences among themselves in various areas including culture, politics, philosophy etc. You, I’m assuming, are a deist who advocates intelligent design while I, a deist as well, accept evolution as both a theory and a fact; and I fully acknowledge that a theory improves as we gain more knowledge throughout time.
: Theism is also a morbid condition brought on by excessive tea-drinking, but this is a different sense of the word.
