• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

8 out of 8 at Citgo station

BCR said:
And his brother says that Edward ducked and covered his head as the plane flew over.
Click to expand...

Wow that horrible soundtrack with high pitched phone ringing during the questioning is your evidence??
He (whoever he allegedly is) didn´t mention anything about ´ducking and covering his head´
You want me to believe you that he motioned this to you?
Weak.

Have you a transcript?
 
jhunter1163 said:
They were linked to a ---------->conspiracy site<---------- which twisted the "white smoke" comment into the good Reverend seeing a missile.

Does that make it a little clearer?
Click to expand...

His quote appears in a religious spread

¨Henry Ticknor, intern minister at the Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington, Virginia, was driving to church that Tuesday morning when American Airlines Flight 77 came in fast and low over his car and struck the Pentagon. "There was a puff of white smoke and then a huge billowing black cloud," he said.¨
Click to expand...

I pointed out that even though he publically cleared this discrepancy up and that he was MILES away from the scene debunker sites STILL quote him as an ´impact witness´.
And I´m sure that he will continue to be used. Dishonesty. But what else can you expect.
There was a conspiracy site that claimed the white smoke was from a missile but I have had debunkers claiming that this white smoke was from the 5 frames.
Both just as dishonest.

What about the other dishonest articles I mentioned? have you looked at them?
 
jhunter1163 said:
It was about ten feet down from the top of the tower, a little high for passing cars. Maybe a really big bird.
Click to expand...

Maybe a soldering mark from the metal steps they have for manual workers to climb the tower?
Who knows.
Thw wing didn´t do it. That´s for sure. Unless the wing stretched all the way from the top of the Annex. Is that what you´re saying?
 
mudlark said:
Maybe a soldering mark from the metal steps they have for manual workers to climb the tower?
Who knows.
Thw wing didn´t do it. That´s for sure. Unless the wing stretched all the way from the top of the Annex. Is that what you´re saying?
Click to expand...

Umm, no. It was pretty clearly clipped by the wing going by. You obviously haven't seen the pic in question. And if the right wingtip of the plane clipped the VDOT mast, it was obviously directly over Rt. 27, well to the south of where Ranquis put it.
 
mudlark said:
He is 100% NOC.
Click to expand...
Yup. That's exactly the problem that you're too dumb to understand. He and Lagasse put the light poles north of citgo and the plane into the pentagon, corroborated & "independently verified" by England. What exactly is the conspiracy theory here?
 
Last edited:
twinstead said:
Mudlark. Your PATH IS IMPOSSIBLE. I don't care how many witnesses you can trot out. Your flight path is impossible. What sad is that you don't even care!
Click to expand...

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1248677650819981509

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=122

There ya go.
Any problems with it go over there and tell them.

Any chance of YOU telling ME what flightpath the plane took?
Seems to be a mystery around here where the plane flew from the Navy Annex to lightpole 1.
 
jhunter1163 said:
Umm, no. It was pretty clearly clipped by the wing going by. You obviously haven't seen the pic in question. And if the right wingtip of the plane clipped the VDOT mast, it was obviously directly over Rt. 27, well to the south of where Ranquis put it.
Click to expand...

How was it ´pretty clearly clipped by the wing going by´??
So you are saying that the plane never went over the Navy Annex?
 
According to Morin, no, it didn't. It went parallel to the edge of the Navy Annex. And you may not be aware of the fact that Morin stated that he had come out from between the wings of the Annex before the plane got there, but Ranquis twisted his words around too.

Seems like your heroes are a gang of liars, Mudlark.
 
Just so you should know hunter, CIT phoned about the VDOT tower and were told that the plane did NOT strike the tower but that the FBI were strengthening communications.
Hope that clears this up before you start embarrassing yourself more.
Ask Farmer too :)
 
mudlark said:
Because it was proposed earlier in the thread that there were ´100s´ of them?
Click to expand...
When?

Because the argument is whether the plane flew NOC and not one SOC witness has been offered as a counterargument?
Click to expand...
Not needed. All of the physical evidence points to the fight path being on the south side of the citgo.
 
mudlark said:
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1248677650819981509

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=122

There ya go.
Any problems with it go over there and tell them.
Click to expand...
Why are you repeating this dodge after I had pointed out that the co-author of that paper, Tino Desideri, has himself been banned from PfT for disagreeing with Balsamo?
:p

16.5 said:
Uhh, yeah, why are you reposting this when i told you what was wrong with this, and you said you were going to go back and ask PFFT for the answers. Did you lie about that??

Stop posting until you can show us CIT's stupid flight path is possible.
Click to expand...
 
jhunter1163 said:
According to Morin, no, it didn't. It went parallel to the edge of the Navy Annex. And you may not be aware of the fact that Morin stated that he had come out from between the wings of the Annex before the plane got there, but Ranquis twisted his words around too.

Seems like your heroes are a gang of liars, Mudlark.
Click to expand...

http://i659.photobucket.com/albums/uu311/buckwheat_bucket/morinPOV2-1.gif
Look at his exact words

"I was inside, it flew over the top of me"

"I had no side view"

"I didn't see the stripes I saw the silver belly"
Click to expand...

How do these lines fit with your assertion?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
W.D.Clinger said:
Why are you repeating this dodge after I had pointed out that the co-author of that paper, Tino Desideri, has himself been banned from PfT for disagreeing with Balsamo?
:p
Click to expand...

What have those figures regarding the possibility of an NOC flyover got to do with those two disagreeing over a completely separate issue??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom