• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

8 out of 8 at Citgo station

mudlark said:
Hopefully one of you guys will have the courage to put forward just ONE SOC witness by tomorrow...
Click to expand...


"At the point where the fuselage hit the wall, it seemed to simply melt into the building. I saw a smoke ring surround the fuselage as it made contact with the wall. It appeared as a smoke ring that encircled the fuselage at the point of contact and it seemed to be several feet thick. I later realized that it was probably the rubble of churning bits of the plane and concrete. The churning smoke ring started at the top of the fuselage and simultaneously wrapped down both the right and left sides of the fuselage to the underside, where the coiling rings crossed over each other and then coiled back up to the top. Then it started over again -- only this next time, I also saw fire, glowing fire in the smoke ring."


Ouch! Penny ever get interviewed by the Douche Twins?
 
mudlark said:
Oh yeah, the larger debris is forced one way and the smaller fragments that could actually float went the other way AND came down within 5 seconds...that the physics we are talking about?
Okay.
Click to expand...

Care to explain where I'm making any errors?
 
Childlike Empress said:
That's your speculation. We, on the other hand, have evidence for what happens when they don't show the plane and you are presented with evidence that what they say can't be true.
Click to expand...
This coming from an individual who selectively ignores parts of the testimony which doesn't agree with bat crap fantasy fly overs
 
UNLoVedRebel said:
No, it's you who needs at least ONE SOC witness. So far we have corroborating testimonies that put the light poles north of citgo (thus the plane hit them and the building) and not one witness who put the light poles SOC.
Click to expand...

I agree. SGT (now LT) Lagasse is a professional law enforcement officer and trained observer. He drives those roads every day and if anyone knows where those light poles are, he does. No, those light poles were downed NoC. The NWO must have put them back up and moved the taxi and downed poles SoC to cover up the fact that the poles were NoC.
 
Childlike Empress said:
You had ample time to explain to us why you deceived the audience about Paik's testimony. You didn't.

Why do you lie about 9/11,
Edited by Gaspode: 
Edited for Rule 12
Click to expand...
What are you making up delusions about now?


Paik pointed to the Pentagon from the tower which 77 almost hit, or hit from his perspective. Your support of CIT is so effective, when are you helping them get the Pulitzer. Wait, there is no Pulitzer Prize for moronic delusions.

All the CIT witnesses point the the south flight path; why are CIT liars not able to comprehend direction?


It does not matter what you make up the FDR has 61.2 to 61.5 degree for the last 22 seconds and Paik pointing matches that true track course. The liars are CIT, if you had something you would post it; you post nothing but praise for the presentation of idiotic delusions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Edwardpointsouth.gif

Edward points east, Liar. On the north side of Columbia Pike, Liar.

Attack the argument, not the arguer
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.911myths.com/images/f/fe/Edwardpointsnorth.gif
Reheat said:
The animated image [above] was taken from the filming of his testimony by CIT. They named this file Edwardpointsnorth.gif, but note that he is NOT pointing North at all. He points parallel to Columbia Pike visible in the background. That is approximately a 0720 heading corresponding along a path EXACTLY to where the next witness observed the aircraft
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Childlike Empress said:
Edwardpointsouth.gif

Edward points east, Liar. On the north side of Columbia Pike, Liar.
Click to expand...
http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/Edwardpointsouth.gif

Paik points to Pentagon direct. Fact, Paik says 77 almost hit the tower behind Paik in the photo, the VDOT tower. This all supports 61.2 to 61.5 degrees found in the hard evidence of the FDR found in the Pentagon after the exact damage made by a kinetic energy impact of a 757. Oops, DNA verifies the impact, and makes CIT dirt dumb liars; are you supporting the delusions of idiots?

Paik points not east but to a flight path of 77; verifies the south flight path, gif titled paik points south, as in to the south flight path verified by RADAR, FDR, witnesses, damage, lampposts, impact damage, DNA, and more. CIT conclusions are false, you like their presentation of lies, that is great.

Paik points south of the NoC, it is a relative thing that CIT fails to realize as they debunk themselves.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh and lets not forget SGT Brooks, one of the famous NoC eyewitnesses.

Brooks audio clip

"To be frozen in time like that, and see that plane just literally clip the lamp poles."

Of course he must be talking about the NoC lamp poles...
 
UNLoVedRebel said:
HA! Beat ya beachnut.:p
Click to expand...
My grandkids were running down the hotel hall... the computer stalled...

etc...

Who said Paik was pointing east? They were wrong and liars, Paik was pointing to a path 77 was making, it was 61.2 to 61.5 degree...
 
BCR said:
And his brother says that Edward ducked and covered his head as the plane flew over.
Click to expand...

Exactly, They claim in that video that Edward "deduced" that it hit the tower. His back was to the plane which he admits seconds into the video. His brother says he ducked. Yet the tree fort gang give enormous weight to his scrawled flight paths, neither of which even match! WTF?? Can it be any clearer that they are cherry picking and engaging in logical fallacies?

http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#special
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#plausible
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#begging
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#coincidence
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#selective
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#dogged
 
Discussion on evidence for Flight 77 split to new thread.
Posted By: Gaspode


Keep it civil please. And enough of the sockpuppet accusations.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode
 
mudlark said:
You´ll have to go to their forum and argue your point with him.
I entered this ´debate´ on seeing YOUR link to witnesses who allegedly contradict NOC.
16.5 in the very next post said that there were ´100s of SOC witnesses´
Both posts are false.
Read what I posted. Then I will post the remainder.
NONE contradict NOC between the Navy Annex and the Pentagon lawn. NONE.
Click to expand...

Of course they do silly! Just for an example, I pointed out one witness who clearly was a SOC witness that you rejected because he could not see the plane hitting the Pentagon, which is kind of silly, but it is the CIT mutts, what ya gonna do? And Probst, you entire response seems to be, he wasn't where he claimed to be. Fallacy of "incredully," that is Craig's specialty!

Say, Mud, the mutts interviewed Probst, why won't they release THAT VIDEO? Or the other raw video like they promised?

Anyway, I digress, I am simply going to have to INSIST that you provide the math for the Flight Path. Thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom